DairyQueen
Well-Known Member
No, we are not dealing with something as straightforward as that, and as I'm sure you are aware thats part of the problem with talking about it now. More than one side is making use of external factors in order to distract from domestic politics and define things in terms of regional and international struggles. The solution to this attempt to keep the narrative narrow in order to serve specific interests, is not to descend to the same level of oversimplification and labelling. You don't actually do a service to the cause you are trying to highlight by playing the same games as the crude propagandists on all sides.
How am I keeping the narrative narrow? This is a Ukrainian problem. If there is an external issue, it is precisely that - an external issue Ukraine has to respond to. I think the Ukrainian government have responded to those external challenges badly. So badly in fact, there is now a catastrophe in Ukraine. The narrative that this is Ukraine against Russia is just ignorant or biased. It certainly ignores or dismisses the last twenty or so years of Ukrainian politics. Ukraine has had a decade to sort these issues out and come to find some kind of stability.
I can accept the notion that Ukraine effectively has no control over the situation, in which case what you are really suggesting is a conflict between Western (American) interests against Russian interests. Invoking the 'poor' little Ukrainians (and excluding the rebels) is simply an American propaganda trick.
Last edited: