ItWillNeverWork
Messy Crimbobs, fellow humans.
White House spokesman on TV now. Still describing them as "peaceful protesters".
BBC world service - radio. It's still on. A series of Ukrainian commentators talking.Can you link this?
White House spokesman on TV now. Still describing them as "peaceful protesters".
I agree with the person from Uganda quoted at the end of that programme. A scramble between the EU and Russia over Ukraine in which the Ukrainian people are the losers. I'm trying to think of a good way out of this, but can't.Rumours of police lending supplies and support to the opposition in towns away from Kiev. This is from an interviewee on BBC World Service.
Obama does appear to be picking a fight with Russia over this. Bad news.White House spokesman on TV now. Still describing them as "peaceful protesters".
Timothy Snyder is Housum Professor of History at Yale and a visiting fellow at the Institute for Human Sciences in Vienna.
I'm not sure it's as simple as that. There is a deeply corrupt political class that all sides are despairing of. Nationalists can thrive in such circumstances, but the grievances they play to are real enough. And I'm not sure it's clear yet exactly what the protesters can be said to stand for as a unified group.But they're at the core of the demonstrations, both in the organisation and the provision of the hardcore rioters. The others are being their, unwitting or not, helpers to the fascist cause.
Informative article, J Ed, thanx.
I'm not sure it's as simple as that. There is a deeply corrupt political class that all sides are despairing of. Nationalists can thrive in such circumstances, but the grievances they play to are real enough. And I'm not sure it's clear yet exactly what the protesters can be said to stand for as a unified group.
http://www.socialistreview.org.uk/issue.php?issue=381 (June 2013 contents)It can't be the Martin Smith. Surely?
So all the photographic evidence showing the far right flags and other fascist paraphernalia aren't a good indication of the aims of the core of the protests? The words 'emu', 'sand' and 'head stuck in' come to mind then.
I'm not denying that they are there. But even Ukrainians seem not to really know what is at the core of the protests. I think there may be more than one core at the moment.So all the photographic evidence showing the far right flags and other fascist paraphernalia aren't a good indication of the aims of the core of the protests? The words 'emu', 'sand' and 'head stuck in' come to mind then.
It can't be the Martin Smith. Surely?
I'm not denying that they are there. But even Ukrainians seem not to really know what is at the core of the protests. I think there may be more than one core at the moment.
That Martin Smith? ffs
The interesting question for me would be how many of the people actually fighting are from the far-right.
Yeah because those radical islamists definitely disappeared didn't they. Christ your own shitty analogy shows what fucking tripe you're talking.they are fighting russians..russian imperial foreign policy turned some of this people into extreme ukrainian nationalists..similar example would be the rise of radical islamism in former english colonies ..do you understand?? ..if this protests turn out right they will be a problem for a while but they will disappear ..few nutcases will allways remain ..this happened in most of eastern europe and hopefully it will happen in ukraine..they are in beginning stages of democracy ..they have to start somewhere
http://www.theguardian.com/world/bl...-crisis-new-clashes-strain-truce-live-updates
Protesters being shot by government forces according to the Guardian.