this is reportedly from mariupol today. from 4:20 show what looks like soldiers shooting unarmed civilians.
It's going to be harder for Putin to contain domestic opinion the more these killings of civilians continue; there will surely be a call for action in Russia to protect those in East Ukraine.
Until now he's given the Kiev gov enough rope to hang themselves with. I can't see that strategy changing soon unless the ukrainian army/ national guard (cough cough) go all out with massacres/ atrocities.Yeah I think he is gonna invade tbh. I'm not looking forward to the referendum on Sunday
Until now he's given the Kiev gov enough rope to hang themselves with. I can't see that strategy changing soon unless the ukrainian army/ national guard (cough cough) go all out with massacres/ atrocities.
So far the only western media I've seen thats managed to get well into the detail and different versions of reality surrounding the main Mariupol attack on the police station has been the independent.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...shes-hopes-of-avoiding-civil-war-9347972.html
Unfortunately it doesn't mention the other shooting stuff thats covered in the footage in this thread. But at least it tries to get into detail about the police station, unlike some really crap BBC and Guardian articles I've seen. Reading that independent article before watching or reading the BBC stuff really highlights the BBC's use of loaded terms and the language of battle. I suppose the BBC scores some points for using plenty of footage from that youtube user including the tank one I posted earlier, but the narrow narrative spoils it.
Ah Channel 4 new also managed to do their job properly:
http://blogs.channel4.com/alex-thomsons-view/bodies-fire-streets-mariupol/7755
This is interesting, it turns out in the 90s Barkashov's Russian National Unity was being funded by the late Russian-British Oligarch Boris Berezovsky and the pain in Putin's ass media tycoon and fellow Russian Oligarch Vladimir Gusinsky.
http://exile.ru/print.php?ARTICLE_ID=7982&IBLOCK_ID=35
Correct me if I'm wrong but Gusinsky owns RTVi which is traditionally anti-Putin and was the former owner of NTV before Gaspron confiscated the channel following his fraud case which was also anti-Putin. What I find interesting about this is it turns out that Vladimir Gusinsky also operates another channel called TVi based in Ukraine which had a critical approach to Viktor Yanukovych.
A few references to Barkashov and Russian National Unity in Wikileaks cables:
https://wikileaks.org/gifiles/docs/37/3729494_-os-2011-119-johnson-s-russia-list-.html
https://wikileaks.org/gifiles/docs/36/3690255_-os-2011-120-johnson-s-russia-list-.html
https://wikileaks.org/gifiles/docs/83/837314_bbc-monitoring-alert-russia-.html
https://wikileaks.org/gifiles/docs/...sia-beheading-video-and-other-extremism-.html
One thing is clear from the vague information in the Wikileaks cables is RNU is closely linked to the Russian Orthodox Church and to a degree the government. However, if there is truth to the information above these government links, which not mentioned in the emails probably comes from the anti-Putin Oligarchy.
Also the Omsk and Ryazan branches were branded as terrorist organization.
It also seems judging from a mixture of articles the organizations peak was 100,000 members in 1999, went into somewhat obscurity until seemingly gaining popularity again during the Chechan war and subsequent famous beheading video. And then went into somewhat shadowy obscurity once again in 2007 following the states crack down on Neo-Nazi groups after the Chechan beheading.
Now the big question, who's been funding the group since 1999? and why does a Russian Oligarch have ties to funding a Russian separatist group who also funds a pro-Ukrainian nationalist TV channel?
I get the impression their is a large amount of government "white washing" and "black money" going into fuelling a "civil war" with the strategic objective of achieving a war of attrition, that will result in the break up of the Russian Federation. Would be interesting to see if anyone can find answers to the questions above, but I can guess and say the money funding these pro-Russian separatists and those pro-Kiev nationalist comes from London under the full knowledge of the EU and US state department.
So far the only western media I've seen thats managed to get well into the detail and different versions of reality surrounding the main Mariupol attack on the police station has been the independent.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...shes-hopes-of-avoiding-civil-war-9347972.html
Unfortunately it doesn't mention the other shooting stuff thats covered in the footage in this thread. But at least it tries to get into detail about the police station, unlike some really crap BBC and Guardian articles I've seen. Reading that independent article before watching or reading the BBC stuff really highlights the BBC's use of loaded terms and the language of battle. I suppose the BBC scores some points for using plenty of footage from that youtube user including the tank one I posted earlier, but the narrow narrative spoils it.
Ah Channel 4 new also managed to do their job properly:
http://blogs.channel4.com/alex-thomsons-view/bodies-fire-streets-mariupol/7755
1) I expressed no approval.
2) If elections happen, do you really thinking that the polling in different areas isn't going to be significant intelligence to any plans Russia makes or has made?
Try engaging your brain before indulging your fondness for smileys next time, eh?
Well, there's certainly nothing new to deploying a "wait and see" tactic. If he wants to annexe bits of Ukraine then an all-Ukraine election will point up which regions there's a greater likelihood of pro-Russian support in/where they might be able to just walk in, Anschluss-stylee.
It's not an assumption. All states have plans for such acts. Give me a good reason why Russia wouldn't do this (or Ukraine wouldn't, either), and you might have an argument, instead of the bleating noise you keep making.
.
It's going to be harder for Putin to contain domestic opinion the more these killings of civilians continue; there will surely be a call for action in Russia to protect those in East Ukraine.
From what I can see Russia has adopted a position towards the west of..right, youve absolutely fucked Ukraine. Its completely broken , completely fucked. Tanks are in the streets facing down civilian protestors and its going into complete economic meltdown. Youre welcome to it now . Its your baby, now take it and all the responsibility that goes with it.
TBH that's how I'm reading it at the moment. The Ukrainian 'Army' gunning down civilians can't be ignored by the Western media indefinitely.
Yeah I don't think that he will do it now, think he will leave it to after the election
Yeah I think he is gonna invade tbh. I'm not looking forward to the referendum on Sunday
Brzezinkis ultimate objective is to break Russia into 3 parts.
In these circumstances, Russia's first priority should be to modernize itself rather than to engage in a futile effort to regain its status as a global power. Given the country's size and diversity, a decentralized political system and free-market economics would be most likely to unleash the creative potential of the Russian people and Russia's vast natural resources. A loosely confederated Russia -- composed of a European Russia, a Siberian Republic, and a Far Eastern Republic -- would also find it easier to cultivate closer economic relations with its neighbors. Each of the confederated entitles would be able to tap its local creative potential, stifled for centuries by Moscow's heavy bureaucratic hand. In turn, a decentralized Russia would be less susceptible to imperial mobilization.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1254548/posts
Ukraine, a new and important space on the Eurasian chessboard, is a geopolitical pivot because its very existence as an independent country helps to transform Russia. Without Ukraine, Russia ceases to be a Eurasian empire. Russia without Ukraine can still strive for imperial status, but it would then become a predominantly Asian imperial state, more likely to be drawn into debilitating conflicts with aroused Central Asians, who would then be resentful of the loss of their recent independence and would be supported by their fellow Islamic states to the south. China would also be likely to oppose any restoration of Russian domination over Central Asia, given its increasing interest in the newly independent states there. However, if Moscow regains control over Ukraine, with its 52 million people and major resources as well as its access to the Black Sea, Russia automatically again regains the wherewithal to become a powerful imperial state, spanning Europe and Asia. Ukraine's loss of independence would have immediate consequences for Central Europe, transforming Poland into the geopolitical pivot on the eastern frontier of a united Europe.- Brzezinski, The Grand Chess Board, page 24ish sorry pdf version.
Although that will take time, it is not too early for the West—while further enhancing its economic and security ties with Kiev—to begin pointing to the decade 2005-2015 as a reasonable time frame for the initiation of Ukraine's progressive inclusion, thereby reducing the risk that the Ukrainians may fear that Europe's expansion will halt on the Polish-Ukrainian border.
Poland is too weak to be a geostrategic player, and it has only one option: to become integrated into the West.
Most likely using their expensive visual recording equipment for surveillance and intel-gathering. If you've got an ultra-high def camera on board, then why wouldn't you be tasked to buzz concentrations of people so that military and/or civil intelligence can analyse who is where?
Targeting in that context would probably mean reconaissance in order to identify targets, and would include taking footage of the surrounding area. If you're going to blow something up, you don't send a single gunship, you send at least one (usually two) others to provide flanking air cover for when hell breaks loose on the ground (as it inevitably does).
Now what ever happens in Ukraine, Russia has been massively damaged as a result - it's kind of a win-win for the US. The result is going to be either a Russian invasion which will result in a draining insurgency movement funded by the West, a civil war equally draining, or Russia turning a blind eye will not only result in a loss of national support for Putin, but also will just be as damaging with a newly ultranationalist pro-EU state on their border. Currently despite the sanctions not having much affect, the biggest damage has been a result of the loss of Russian industry connection in Eastern Ukraine and strategic buffer against NATO expansion.
Oh no... am I being found insufficiently contributive in the great struggle against Adolf Putin!?
Ffs. Smileys are just so much more efficient in light of the above.
[QUOTE="
Nothing says fascism more than a "politician" talking to a beaten tortured semi naked man. Good old Lyashko, no matter how many naked men you beat up the gay rumours well never fully go away.
Anyway I posted about these guy earlier, I think it's safe to say that Чорні чоловічки (Black men) are just a new unit of Right Sector funded by the army. Remember the armies divided between nationalists and pro-Russian so it's only obvious these guys are going in doing the heavy working and the gear can only come from the Ukraine army. Any way they have a web page (note the armband is Patriots of Ukraine) http://vk.com/blackmens and then their is this message hunting for the cossacks on Patriots of Ukraine home page.
http://snaua.info/chorni-cholovichki-ogoloshuyut-polyuvannya-na-zelenih-vorogiv/.
except what he doesnt forecast is Russia firmly securing its Black Sea fleet for seemingly perpetuity. And what seems to be quite forseeable is the ultranationalist camp , who failed to secure victory in previous elections and had to resort to a coup, coming a major cropper in the near future. Because its they who are going to be drained in eastern ukraine and almost certainly not the Russians, who seem to have foresaw a Brzinzkiesque provocation and trap in the making and majorly backed off .
Whats going to be left in Ukraine is a highly polarised population ,massive internal destabilisation, population centres in open revolt and under a military occupation that may well be very long lasting, and whatever resources and industry they possess ravaged by the IMF and EU preconditions and practices. In other words a massive and very expensive mess that Russia has opted to dump very firmly in the wests lap. Russia is also highly unlikely to continue propping Ukraine up economically any further.
On the diplomatic front Russia is now in line with the OSCE, while the junta are rejecting the OSCE proposals.
simply put its forseeable there mightnt be much of any kind of a state in Ukraine in the future, bar a failed one of the wests making .
I also think Putin has done enough as regards Crimea to secure his popularity and deflect any serious internal criticism or rebuke. The same certainly cannot be said of the crew now in power in Kiev who could well soon became international as well as local pariahs. Even Yanukovic never sent tanks and gunships against his own people and look what happened his credibility. This lot are doing that while simultaneously charging into economic ruin and mass enforced austerity. I also saw footage today of Nuland being grilled by republican senators over her support for neo nazis in Kiev, an issue that seems to be gaining traction over there. They took absolutely no nonsense from her despite her attempts to sidestep the issue.
http://larouchepac.com/node/30736
so yeah, the west have secured a victory of sorts in Ukraine but it could turn out to be a very hollow one . While Putin has secured a very real win as regards Crimea as well as avoiding an apparent trap were it would be bogged down Ukraine while subjected to international isolation and economic warfare . Its the west and its puppets who will come out of this as deeply discreditted, not Russia .
Lyashkos facebook page states the order has been given that therell be no prisoners taken in the assault on the recalcitrant cops beseiged in their base. Looks like he was giving that order himself and was as good as his word.
On the other hand, we are disgusted by the reaction of the right-liberal and patriotic general public which takes delight in the Odessa deaths. However wrong the killed people might have been, they shouldn’t have died in this brutish accident. .
No I'm not doubting that the first shots were fired from pro russians.
but tbf, most of that stuff also sounds like it's just as partial as albu/ borotbas
Nonetheless, my overall point, was to point out how Brzinzkyie's theory that Russia, after the lose of Ukraine would be pushed into conflict with China in Central Asia. Brzinzkyie never predicted the annexation of Crimea, or a possible civil war, but I think US foreign policy has and is becoming increasingly more aggressive over the past two decades. Listen to Brzinzkyie he even calls for de-escalation: