Oh I realise that, but was it a part of a centralised policy of expansion or was it just individual arseholes trying to make a buck here or there (more there than here)? And also as you mention they failed each time which sort of hints at the possibility that it was just individual groups of "entrepreneurs" that were pushing north.
Because the Russian government is far right. Of the 14 defining characteristics of fascism, I'd say Putin's Russia meets 9 or 10 of them.
1. Powerful and Continuing Nationalism
2. Disdain for the Recognition of Human Rights
3. Identification of Enemies/Scapegoats as a Unifying Cause
4. Supremacy of the Military
6. Controlled Mass Media
7. Obsession with National Security
8. Religion and Government are Intertwined to the government's policies or actions.
9. Corporate Power is Protected
10. Labor Power is Suppressed
12. Obsession with Crime and Punishment
13. Rampant Cronyism and Corruption
14. Fraudulent Elections
I'm not joking about the Pig War. There were various situations in Canada where US traders would come north, then start acting as if they controlled the territory. The likely intent was to extend US influence north of the 49th. They built forts on the southern prairies; and in the Fraser Canyon of BC, they started conflicts with, and killed, local indigenous people. They were successfully pushed back each time.
i realise its a somewhat wide question, with all manner of nuances and exceptions and weird and wonderful sub-plots and generalisations, but what are the historical dynamics regarding who likes who, who hates who, and who's on ok terms, but has baggage with who in that part of the world?
is there a post-Soviet solidarity between the old satelite states that trumps previous emnity, or have they gone back to business as usual, or what?
Svoboda: An Extraordinary Journey (with the Graunid)
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/mar/13/ukraine-uprising-fascist-coup-grassroots-movement
Fantastic old fashioned marketing there - fascism as mere anti-Communism.
Nayem, Haran and others in Kiev argue that the Kremlin's description of a neo-Nazi power-grab is unfounded. A better critique, they say, is that the politicians now in charge are from the same political class that has failed Ukraine in the past,
From my knowledge of present day East Europeans, in particular the Poles, they support the Ukrainian people against the Russians. ( And I say people as East Europeans are also critical of there own states governments. They have sympathy for ordinary Ukrainians who want to be part of Europe.)
Despite the history of the the Poles being ethnically cleansed from areas of what was is now Western Ukraine during WW2 by Banderas lot. Before WW2 parts of present day western Ukraine were part of Poland. Present day Poland has no wish to alter borders again.
Just because I don't like it when Russia disregards International law doesn't mean I cheerlead for the US if they do similar. But tbh I can't remember the last time the US actually annexed a part of a neighbouring country, Texas was maybe the last occasion.
Only Puerto Rico is close to being a neighbouring state and it as with Guam came to have their relationship with the USA as a result of the Spanish-American war, American Samoa was the result of a tiff between the US and Germany. So not exactly great but still date back to the end of the 19th century/start of 20th century and don't involve the military occupation of a neighbouring states territory and the annexation of that territory.
I think that it starts with 'entrepeneurs', who then set up businesses etc. Don't forget that Manifest Destiny was the standard operating procedure in the US back then.
When the locals become restive, there is now a reason for the home govt to consider whether or not it is necessary to 'protect US nationals and US interests'. The concern about the US trying to infiltrate and annex British Columbia was the impetus behind the building of the Trans Canada Railroad. The same process occurring in Southern Alberta etc was also part of the reason behind the formation of the RNWMP, precursor to the RCMP.
Yes, it's a worthless conspiracy list. And newsweek of all places used it last week - complete with a a link to rense - which, i suspect is where Tom saw it.Those aren't the defining characteristics of fascism that's a list someone put on the internet to prove the us government is fascist
From my knowledge of present day East Europeans, in particular the Poles, they support the Ukrainian people against the Russians. ( And I say people as East Europeans are also critical of there own states governments. They have sympathy for ordinary Ukrainians who want to be part of Europe.)
Despite the history of the the Poles being ethnically cleansed from areas of what was is now Western Ukraine during WW2 by Banderas lot. Before WW2 parts of present day western Ukraine were part of Poland. Present day Poland has no wish to alter borders again.
A lot of Poles still are suspicious of the Russian governments due to long history of occupation by Russian Empire and Soviet Union. What happened previously between Ukrainians and Poles is secondary to suspicion of Russian governments. (Or Russians in general as a Polish friend of mine dislikes the lot of them. Bit harsh. She does not like Germans either. Her Grandmother told her all about the Nazi occupation).
In a way this sort of reminds me of Kosovo except this time it's the EU talking about national sovereignty and the need to respect borders etc.
Frankly though if I was a Crimean Tatar I'd fe feeling very very worried right now.
Is this some sort of joke?But why particularly, are Tartars actively persecuted in Russia? I know there are fascists on both sides of this mess...
They've been recognised as a group by Ukraine. Prior to that, they had been deported to central Asia by Stalin. Only returned in the 90s.But why particularly, are Tartars actively persecuted in Russia? I know there are fascists on both sides of this mess...
Is this some sort of joke?
But why particularly, are Tartars actively persecuted in Russia? I know there are fascists on both sides of this mess...
Three weeks into this and you ask that question? I'm sorry, but that slapdash attitude is what's causing the problem here.No, apron, it's a question. Frogwoman may provide a reasonably ellucidating answer. Have you a problem with that, or am I not permitted to ask any questions because I am known to have enjoyed a science fiction novel or two and have expressed an interest in technologies you don't like?
They've been recognised as a group by Ukraine. Prior to that, they had been deported to central Asia by Stalin. Only returned in the 90s.
The crimean constitution is supposed to guarantee each citizen a bit of land and other associated rights. Guess which part of the population the political representatives of the russianphone majority choose to deny this right to?