UK courtroom to hear evidence against the official narrative of 9/11

[Pickman's model]

What a fucking ugly looking court. Why've they got electricity boxes on the roof?

they're not electricity boxes, they're surveillance gear monitoring the loons outside. and quite possibly some form of mind control technology.

more to the point, what's happened to the five storeys which used to be there?

 

[DotCommunist]

What a fucking ugly looking court. Why've they got electricity boxes on the roof?

most magistrates outside of big towns and cities are fuck ugly and plain

 

[Pickman's model]

most magistrates are fuck ugly and plain

corrected for you

 

[two sheds]

You'd imagine there's also a high probability that the magistrate was actually a tory, meaning that he might not agree with the 9/11 stuff but he'll certainly believe the BBC is a hotbed of communist activity that needs taking down a peg or two.

If this was somebody refusing to pay an electricity company because they were burning coal and fucking up the atmosphere the magistrate would doubtless feel it would be right to make an example of them to double the fine plus a couple of months in pokey.

Presumably the conditional discharge means he has to pay the fine by the way, anybody know?

 

[Spymaster]

Presumably the conditional discharge means he has to pay the fine by the way, anybody know?

I wouldn't have thought so. Normally a conditional discharge means you walk away unpunished.

 

[two sheds]

He must have to pay at least the tv licence though, otherwise he'd be claiming it as a victory? Perhaps it's at least conditional on paying the tv licence in which case we might get round 2 .

 

[cesare]

Now formally guilty and evidence told to gtf.

Not sure why the mag needed to string it out that long with his/her explanation of why it was all irrelevant - the loons will now report it as nearly 90 minutes of evidence was heard...."

In anticipation of him appealing, I guess.

 

[Spymaster]

He must have to pay at least the tv licence though, otherwise he'd be claiming it as a victory? Perhaps it's at least conditional on paying the tv licence in which case we might get round 2 .

Would make sense. Without seeing exactly what's been said it's impossible to know.

I'm not sure how it works. If the bloke didn't have a licence why was he discharged?

 

[Monkeygrinder's Organ]

He must have to pay at least the tv licence though, otherwise he'd be claiming it as a victory? Perhaps it's at least conditional on paying the tv licence in which case we might get round 2 .

Wouldn't they just send the bailiffs round?

 

[butchersapron]

Would make sense. Without seeing exactly what's been said it's impossible to know.

I'm not sure how it works. If the bloke didn't have a licence why was he discharged?

A CD is a guilty. As suggested, it's likely the condition was that he pay the bloody thing.

 

[ViolentPanda]

The silly man argued for a bit, then got a guilty of not paying his licence fee. That's it. Was over in under half hour pretty much.

Damn those Jew Illuminati magistrates to Hell!!!

 

[Spymaster]

Gotcha.

 

[ViolentPanda]

or is a shit Toploader covers band

TBF, a Toploader covers band would by definition be shit, given that Toploader were a steaming pile of kack.

 

[brogdale]

Latest : Sussex Police confirm 5 dancing Israelis arrested.

 

[butchersapron]

Galloway: I don't dance with Israelis.

 

[editor]

130? I think not. Even given there may be people behind the camera - why someone looking to show a good turnout would do that though? I count 25-30ish

Imagine having a party and that lot showed up. Be a bit of a fun conversation killer, I imagine.

 

[Monkeygrinder's Organ]

Imagine having a party and that lot showed up. Be a bit of a fun conversation killer, I imagine.

Apparently they'd get the dance floor going though.

 

[Lemon Eddy]

Apparently they'd get the dance floor going though.

I bet that jews look good on the dance floor
I don't know if you're looking for romance or don't know what you're looking for
Well I bet that jews look good on the dance floor
Dancing to electro-pop like a robot from 1984

 

[barney_pig]

130? I think not. Even given there may be people behind the camera - why someone looking to show a good turnout would do that though? I count 25-30ish

Any urbanites there for the Lolz?

 

[DotCommunist]

Not a V mask among them. Standards are slipping

 

[el-ahrairah]

it's a proper loons' convention

i recognise one of them from Occupy Finsbury Square. He had lots of leaflets about Fractional Reserve Banking and Rothschild Zionism, which kept n filling up the bin nicely.

 

[editor]

I'm hoping the one girl in the photo is a reporter so I can stick to my stereotypes.

 

[Pickman's model]

I'm hoping the one girl in the photo is a reporter so I can stick to my stereotypes.

She looks sufficiently bored to be a journalist

 

[prunus]

Need more conspiralunacy!

Now addicted to Jazzz threads.

 

[binka]

Need more conspiralunacy!

Now addicted to Jazzz threads.

they are good fun i just wish he'd finish one before starting the next

 

[Jazzz]

Published on Monday 25 February 2013 15:05

Charged with not paying his TV licence, Tony Rooke had claimed at Horsham Magistrates’ Court that the BBC’s treatment of the 9/11 attacks made it complicit in acts of terrorism.

He asked to submit evidence which he said would show that the BBC had consistently failed to report the true story.

District Judge Stephen Nicholls said that, even if he accepted and agreed with the evidence, that would not give him grounds to rule that Rooke was not guilty.

He imposed a six month conditional discharge, with £200 legal costs.

Outside court, Rooke said the case had been a ‘score draw’ since the judge had looked at the evidence - albeit in private - and had decided not to fine him.

He called for anyone who has evidence which challenges the official version of the 9/11 terrorist attacks to pass it to the authorities.

West Sussex County Times (plus video clip)

 

[littlebabyjesus]

 

[killer b]

'called for' eh?

 

[butchersapron]

"in private". Uh-huh. He secretly agreed with me. They all do tony, they all do.

 

[existentialist]

"in private". Uh-huh. He secretly agreed with me. They all do tony, they all do.

And what an utterly boring, characterless piece of work he was. I was rather hoping, with all the conspiraloonery, that he'd at least be slightly colourful...but no, not a bit of it.