Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

torchwood

Most of the time he wasn't helping them, though, just telling them they were doomed. He only joined in when he realised that Jack would have to kill his own grandkid, and he (scientist bloke, that is) sounded really pleased about it.
Yeh he even chuckled as he said the kid would fry......evil little shit. I think he was a very unhinged man tbh.
 
Well that was borderline sick: shooting your own offspring; kidnapping kids; frying your own nephew for the greater good. Blimey!

Loved the children as drugs idea.

Felt myself reaching for my air baseball bat when the army were on the estate dragging off our cheeky street urchins.

Great stuff and Torchwood is normally so sh*t. Weird.
Was worse than that, the lad was his own grandson!
 
Most of the time he wasn't helping them, though, just telling them they were doomed. He only joined in when he realised that Jack would have to kill his own grandkid, and he (scientist bloke, that is) sounded really pleased about it.

Fair point. But I didn't really get that bit - why he had that gleeful air about it. There was no gain for him.

Maybe I'm being thick but earlier on I quite liked him - he reminded me of a cross between Q from the Bond films and the President's assistant from the West Wing . .

<thick smiley>
 
Was worse than that, the lad was his own grandson!
That was quite clever. He sacrificed one (this time) to save the many, the same thing he did in 1965, which no one could understand and which he couldn't live with. Of course he will always live with both occasions, literally.
 
the least important and convincing part of the whole series was jack harkness. they could have made the whole thing without him.
 
Fair point. But I didn't really get that bit - why he had that gleeful air about it. There was no gain for him.

Maybe I'm being thick but earlier on I quite liked him - he reminded me of a cross between Q from the Bond films and the President's assistant from the West Wing . .

<thick smiley>

Perhaps he was glad because it would destroy Jack and wouldn't exactly please the woman who shot him.
 
Perhaps he was glad because it would destroy Jack and wouldn't exactly please the woman who shot him.

:confused:

Not sure - doesn't seem like 'enough'. It's not like Jack and hard-faced bitch* had any meaningful bond.

* - who causes a bulge in my pants tbh
 
You need Jack or you lose the dynamic with Gwen and her bloke, which always makes me feel sad.
 
That was quite clever. He sacrificed one (this time) to save the many, the same thing he did in 1965, which no one could understand and which he couldn't live with. Of course he will always live with both occasions, literally.

Huge question to ask the audience and then involve them in the consequences of though.

I mean, maybe its just my own insanity talking but it is, on reflection, a bit mad that the moment the choice dawned on him I did find myself realising who the kid would be (lets face it, it was obvious) and that it would be the "right" thing to do. Has any tv programme ever done that with regards to sacrificing a child, and then made the audience deal with the consequences?
 
I was also well on side with Head Geek for continuing to help them after the leg shot, though. Takes a bigger man than me . . :D

I've never been shot in the leg but I imagine it's very, very painful. Found it hard to imagine he'd be helping them rather than writhing with pain.
 
I mean, maybe its just my own insanity talking but it is, on reflection, a bit mad that the moment the choice dawned on him I did find myself realising who the kid would be (lets face it, it was obvious) and that it would be the "right" thing to do. Has any tv programme ever done that with regards to sacrificing a child, and then made the audience deal with the consequences?

I thought there must be some way around it.
 
the least important and convincing part of the whole series was jack harkness. they could have made the whole thing without him.

The storyline couldn't have worked without him.

:confused:

Not sure - doesn't seem like 'enough'. It's not like Jack and hard-faced bitch* had any meaningful bond.

* - who causes a bulge in my pants tbh

No - she was close to the kid and his mum.
 
I've never been shot in the leg but I imagine it's very, very painful. Found it hard to imagine he'd be helping them rather than writhing with pain.

Obviously there's a 'suspension of disbelief' element, plus the fact that legshots are often fatal in reality, but yes, I didn't get where his motivation was in continuing to help them.
 
No - she was close to the kid and his mum.

What, really hard-faced bitch that as far as we know doesn't know this guy? He doesn't know how much it took for her to begin to show sympathy unless there is some unexposited back story. :confused:
 
Huge question to ask the audience and then involve them in the consequences of though.

I mean, maybe its just my own insanity talking but it is, on reflection, a bit mad that the moment the choice dawned on him I did find myself realising who the kid would be (lets face it, it was obvious) and that it would be the "right" thing to do. Has any tv programme ever done that with regards to sacrificing a child, and then made the audience deal with the consequences?
I haven't seen much tv for a number of years so I can't comment on that. I did think though that, in the end, they dumped moral compexity into our laps in an exceptional way.

Aside from the 10% of children, there was the civil servant shooting his family, Jack's grandson, the role of police, army, special forces, and even the UK's relationship with the empire of the day.

It was a tight weave.
 
Great Drama. It's rare to see stuff like that on mainstream telly.

I didn't work out how they got rid of the 4,5,6, though.
 
Aside from the 10% of children, there was the civil servant shooting his family, Jack's grandson, the role of police, army, special forces, and even the UK's relationship with the empire of the day.

It was a tight weave.

Nicely put - there was a lot to deal with for a primetime BBC1 audience.

Ok, most people would have switched off either cos of the sci-fi thing or the gay thing but still challenging for anyone still watching.
 
Lois, maybe? I guess Gwen and Rhys couldn't do much more than try to save individual children. PC Andy, Ianto's sister and her husband - a fair few stayed true. Of course, even Jack did the 'right' thing, but it was bloody horrible.

@feyr: Me too; I never usually cry at TV or the movies at all, but didn't stop till about ten minutes after this ended.


Fucking hell, I'm going to have to recite to myself twenty times 'That was not real, that was not real.....'

i have to admit, i went in and fussed over my kids, had to stop myself waking them up to hug them :oops:

Aye. They had the same problem with Buffy.

<gets coat>

hehehe. i loved that musical episode :oops:

Great Drama. It's rare to see stuff like that on mainstream telly.

I didn't work out how they got rid of the 4,5,6, though.

that bit did seemed a bit rushed, didnt explain how the 456 had used the frequency to kill clem without killing itself, or if jack changed the frequecy to one fatal to 456 but not humans
 
I thought that the mad scientist ultimately helped them because he was generally disinterested in the whole thing; he was indifferent when he prophesised doom and indifferent when he found himself in a position to contribute, he helped for the vague feeling of power and the glee of maintaining his dettatchment while the others had to make all the hard choices.

As for the Deus ex Machina ending, yeah, a bit cliched but nicely done. After all, Will Smith never had to kill his child in Independance Day and there wasn't much of a sense of victory even when the 456 left, just depressed relief.
 
I've never been shot in the leg but I imagine it's very, very painful. Found it hard to imagine he'd be helping them rather than writhing with pain.
To be fair, they'd probably popped a syrette of morphine into him, or he'd have been screaming like a howler monkey.
 
Great Drama. It's rare to see stuff like that on mainstream telly.

I didn't work out how they got rid of the 4,5,6, though.

The 456 used a transmitted resonance wave to kill Clem. jack and the smug boffin reasoned that to have used that waveform the 456 must be attuned to it, and that the children (who the 456 had been using as their mouthpieces) would also be attuned to it. They used Jack's grandson as the "transmitter" of the wave to the other children, who amplified it and sent it down their link to the 456. It did to the 456 what the 456 did to Clem.
 
Back
Top Bottom