True power lies behind a throne not on it.
They intend to rule from the shadows.
Anybody that is seeking to defend it: can you please give us a précis of the plot that actually makes sense of any of the questions being raised in this thread?
Who rules angels?
That doesn't answer any of the questions.Which questions?
The plot was fairly simple... three powerful families get hold of a number of artifacts of significance. They use them to try and become gods. Jack stops them. Rex by accident inherits jack's immortality.
I don't disagree with you about content of the plot being adult themed but it's the way it was written that comes across as childish.
That doesn't answer any of the questions.
The Governance of Deities squad. A regulatory body made up of an expert panel.
Which questions?
The plot was fairly simple... three powerful families get hold of a number of artifacts of significance. They use them to try and become gods. Jack stops them. Rex by accident inherits jack's immortality.
The universe, infinity and Simon Cowell?
Which questions?
At times it felt like it was a proper 13 part US series which had had its budget slashed, necessitating half of every episode to take place on one set.
I like how the evidence of the traitor was texted to that guy's phone at the very last minute. It's literally what a child would come up with.
'And then, and then the software with that lady's name is sent to his phone.'
'How, Russell? How does that happen?'
'I don't know, it JUST DOES.'
These three families had everything. They had control of politics, finance, corporations, the lot. Their members lived literally like old-school aristocracy. So what exactly was their interest in destroying the society that was keeping them living like this?
What agenda? Srs, what was Danes saying and why was this so important to the families? A bunch of bland statements about painkillers being important?
Leaving aside the fact that if you wanted to create a populist leader to carry a message, you'd surely start from anywhere other than a notorious rapist-paedophile-murderer?
Pretty much every single thing that I can think of about that plot made no sense whatsoever.
How did they know that putting Jack's blood in both holes would result in the whole world becoming immortal? It's not like it's a thesis you can test. And yet they'd planned for it.
And their plan involved... what? Stockpiling painkillers? That's it?
How did the death camps actually help the families in any way?
None of it made remotely any sense.
What was the point of Danes to the plan? What WAS the plan? Why hadn't they blown up the Blessing holes months ago?
'And then, and then, the man shoots someone and he dies...'
'But I thought people couldn't die?'
'And then the Director of the CIA walks in...'
'Hang on, where's he come from? Why wasn't he in the CIA office earlier?'
'And then, and then...'
In what way? I thought some of the writing was genuinely chilling.
The plot holes are plot holes. They don't really matter. If it had been tight - a ride - you wouldn't really give a shit.Anybody that is seeking to defend it: can you please give us a précis of the plot that actually makes sense of any of the questions being raised in this thread?
Here are just some of the many posts that raise questions about the plot:
I'm not disagreeing with you in those terms, as an adult sticking in some sex or gore doesn't make something adult for me , it needs to have some level of complexity to the plot (and by complexity I mean stuff that makes sense not just crap thrown in to suddenly to explain something) and this didn't have that.
A great example is the flashback episode, they need to get the bit where the families get jacks blood so they just stick it in and then next episode it suddenly becomes relevant, it was a fucking awful plot device and to be honest it was really poor writing, I can imagine the writers thought process when they realise they needed to introduce jacks lover as a significant character so they threw the flashback episode to get round it. The idea that a new character has to be shoehorned in like that rather than introduced as a gradual process leaving you to wonder about their significance over a few episodes than how it was done, is quite frankly an insult to my intelligence.
My biggest gripe of the gay lover arc was the abduction, turned into come meet the man behind the miracle, turned into actually he knows fuck all it was the family wot dun it (and we know fuck all about them too, other than their names).
None of that actually works though at anything other than the most surface of responses. They raise more questions than they answer. Many of the questions that your responses raise have been mentioned in this very thread.Okay... point by point if possible.
1. Smart phone. Not really that difficult.
2. Immortality and deification.
3. Danes introduced the concept of category zero and served as a mouthpiece for the "angels" plotline. His use to the family was incidental and he was told as such at the end. He gave himself purpose... but for inhuman reasons.
4. a) How did they know? Perhaps they tried one at a time and it did nothing... perhaps their research turned up an old legend about immortal blood? I'm not sure it matters. They is powerful...had lots of time and growing resources.
b) Phase 1. They never got to phase 2. The painkillers and death camps were for general population control.
5. They needed to remove jack and all his blood first? Not sure, really.
6. not sure what you're referring to.
I don't know that either. Oh well.Queer as Folk
GS(v)
Although that episode did focus a bit too much on building a history to their relationship.
You don't have any more fish.sounds like some of the puzzles in that Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy Game
That is indeed a very big gripe, but is it the biggest gripe? Tough call, tough call.
Bait.
I wish I had some fish, I'm stuck arguing with a door on the heart of goldYou don't have any more fish.