nino_savatte
No pasaran!
I'm surprised they didn't hire the Lyric Theatre for their production. I'm sure Tobes's mates (like Harry Phibbs) on the council could have swung it for the WLFS.
I'm thinking here of Katie Hopkins, the Sun columnist and reality show contestant who regularly incurs the wrath of the liberal Left on Twitter by expressing unfashionable opinions. A couple of weeks ago, she got into trouble for issuing the following tweet shortly after the helicopter crash in Glasgow:
Life expectancy in Scotland based 07/08 birth is 59.5. Goodness me. That lot will do anything to avoid working until retirement.
This caused such outrage that the moral guardians of all that is right and proper started a petition demanding that Hopkins stop appearing on television: "We the undersigned are sick and tired of ITV and Channel 5 giving her airtime and want her banned from all TV shows on your channels such as This Morning and The Wright Stuff." The petition now has 90,000 signatures and, rather worryingly, ITV has issued a statement saying it has "no plans for Katie to appear on This Morning at this present time". Not legal censorship, and not censorship that could be prevented by a First Amendment, but censorship nonetheless.
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/t...-hopkins-shows-why-we-need-a-first-amendment/
english_pensioner
• 16 hours ago
I can see nothing wrong with the first comment, even if it is made after the helicopter crash - there is no connection. On that flimsy basis, presumably all jokes about death, helicopters, pubs, indeed perhaps all Scots, must be banned following such an incident.
We certainly need a guarantee of free speech, and of a free press, but a politically correct minority from all walks seem to abhor the idea so that they can stop anything with which they disagree
Vote UKIP for greater independence..
He's using Hopkins to have a pop at 'the Left' but I suspect there are people who don't consider themselves to be left-wing who find her outbursts tiresome and ill-informed.Even within his contradictory and stupid libertarian ideology a right to free speech does not give you the right to an audience. (Unfortunately) no one is forcibly stopping Katie Hopkins from speaking, 'consumers' are asking mostly private TV companies to alter a product that they pay for or is it only okay when censorship is imposed by big capital?
He's using Hopkins to have a pop at 'the Left' but I suspect there are people who don't consider themselves to be left-wing who find her outbursts tiresome and ill-informed.
And being hired as a rentagob by This Morning seems to be the only work she's got. I don't think any of her business ventures have gotten anywhere. She couldn't even persude Alansugar to waste his time on her.She is phenomenally tedious, albeit she is probably required to be in order to stay in work.
Like you say Penishead basically wants a first amendment which prevents us disagreeing with the likes of him,Hopkins and their vile ilk.......Only self-styled educationalist, Toby Young, could defend a snooty and vile gobshite like Katie Hopkins. In this blog, Tobes tells us how much we need a 'First Amendment'. This idea of 'free speech' that Tobes advocates is one in which people like La Hopkins are allowed to spew bile without being challenged. For to challenge such abhorrent views is a refusal of 'free speech'... apparently.
To have a 'first amendent' you'd need to have a document; a constitution or bill of rights first.
He's supported, as ever, by a mix of LOLibertarians, Kippers and headbangers. This comment gives La Hopkins remarks the thumbs up:
So delusional.
Vote UKIP for a return to the 11th century.
http://companycheck.co.uk/company/06289329And being hired as a rentagob by This Morning seems to be the only work she's got. I don't think any of her business ventures have gotten anywhere. She couldn't even persude Alansugar to waste his time on her.
actually to be fair he has a point.
fuck off dickhead:
You done shit in the last 10 years?
I knew her business was in the hole. I think her only employee was one of her lovers/partners/food.http://companycheck.co.uk/company/06289329
She makes a living by being a dull ignorant turgid offensive troll......a low rent Dick Littlecock if you like....
Her company's net worth is £-11,927http://companycheck.co.uk/company/06289329
She makes a living by being a dull ignorant turgid offensive troll......a low rent Dick Littlecock if you like....
actually to be fair he has a point.
To blame everything on a tory government is bollocks. but somehow you socialist pricks manage it whilst forgetting your own part. I was fucking homeless and jobless during Blairs stint. Asked for help and got fuck all. I would get the same today but to blame this on a style of government is a waste of time to the bigger problem
idiots
It has a negative net worth because liabilities outweigh assets. That's actually a Good Thing; it means there is an order book. Liabilities are the same thing as sales.
no.Some of us didn't support Blair or his ideas, and those who did pretty much abjured socialism simply by supporting him - New Labour and socialism didn't mix.
So, mouthing abuse like "socialist pricks" misses the point almost as much as you're claiming others do, doesn't it?
It has a negative net worth because liabilities outweigh assets. That's actually a Good Thing; it means there is an order book. Liabilities are the same thing as sales.
You fuckers will never get anywhere cos of all your infighting and egos. When i was a kid i used to buy the socialist worker. Then i realised they really wouldnt achieve shite. Ever. Keep arguing amongst yourselves.
Did you get a job at PWC or KPMG?
It has a negative net worth because liabilities outweigh assets. That's actually a Good Thing; it means there is an order book. Liabilities are the same thing as sales.
And how are "liabilities the same thing as sales"?