PTK
Paul Kegan
Ggz
Ggz
Icon see what you did there.These claims are verging on the ridiculous.
That is a God-awful pun.Icon see what you did there.
Interested to see The Protoevangelium of James getting the recognition it deserves as a reputable source. Here's the birth of Jesus:No He Didn't, but He had lots of close relatives; perhaps half brothers from Joseph
Jesus had Brothers?
Why do Catholics teach that Mary was a virgin throughout her life when the Bible clearly says that Jesus had brothers? Ever been asked that? Let me offer four r...www.catholic.com
I was disturbed enough about Doubting Thomas putting his fingers in Jesus' wounds.Interested to see The Protoevangelium of James getting the recognition it deserves as a reputable source. Here's the birth of Jesus:
the infant appeared, and went and took the breast from His mother Mary. And the midwife cried out, and said: This is a great day to me, because I have seen this strange sight. And the midwife went forth out of the cave, and Salome met her. And she said to her: Salome, Salome, I have a strange sight to relate to you: a virgin has brought forth — a thing which her nature admits not of. Then said Salome: As the Lord my God lives, unless I thrust in my finger, and search the parts, I will not believe that a virgin has brought forth.
And the midwife went in, and said to Mary: Show yourself; for no small controversy has arisen about you. And Salome put in her finger, and cried out, and said: Woe is me for mine iniquity and mine unbelief, because I have tempted the living God; and, behold, my hand is dropping off as if burned with fire.
You don't often see that in primary school nativity plays.
Blimey.Interested to see The Protoevangelium of James getting the recognition it deserves as a reputable source. Here's the birth of Jesus:
the infant appeared, and went and took the breast from His mother Mary. And the midwife cried out, and said: This is a great day to me, because I have seen this strange sight. And the midwife went forth out of the cave, and Salome met her. And she said to her: Salome, Salome, I have a strange sight to relate to you: a virgin has brought forth — a thing which her nature admits not of. Then said Salome: As the Lord my God lives, unless I thrust in my finger, and search the parts, I will not believe that a virgin has brought forth.
And the midwife went in, and said to Mary: Show yourself; for no small controversy has arisen about you. And Salome put in her finger, and cried out, and said: Woe is me for mine iniquity and mine unbelief, because I have tempted the living God; and, behold, my hand is dropping off as if burned with fire.
You don't often see that in primary school nativity plays.
That is excellentInterested to see The Protoevangelium of James getting the recognition it deserves as a reputable source. Here's the birth of Jesus:
the infant appeared, and went and took the breast from His mother Mary. And the midwife cried out, and said: This is a great day to me, because I have seen this strange sight. And the midwife went forth out of the cave, and Salome met her. And she said to her: Salome, Salome, I have a strange sight to relate to you: a virgin has brought forth — a thing which her nature admits not of. Then said Salome: As the Lord my God lives, unless I thrust in my finger, and search the parts, I will not believe that a virgin has brought forth.
And the midwife went in, and said to Mary: Show yourself; for no small controversy has arisen about you. And Salome put in her finger, and cried out, and said: Woe is me for mine iniquity and mine unbelief, because I have tempted the living God; and, behold, my hand is dropping off as if burned with fire.
You don't often see that in primary school nativity plays.
Yes, it was. Luke painted Mary while she was on a visit to her homeland, Poland.Was that painted by Luke as well?
YesWas that painted by Luke as well?
correctYes, it was. Luke painted Mary while she was on a visit to her homeland, Poland.
Fado version of Ave Maria
Fado version of Ave Maria
That article doesn't 'exactly' translate, it just cherry picks one example where the Greek word for brother was used to mean something other than full biological brother, and then decides the same must apply to Jesus. James is referred to as Jesus' brother not only in the gospels, but also by Paul in his letters, the earliest written source about Jesus. The only reason to claim James was anything other than the full brother of Jesus is to fulfill a dogma that originates over a 100 years after his death.No, we must interpret unclear passages by exactly translating from the language(s) of the original text, which is certainly not Cromwellian English..
The four canonical gospels, Matthew, Mark, Luke and John are said to have been written between a.d 66 and 110. If Jesus died in adulthood, (some say he began to preach around 30 y/o) then that just isn't accurate.That article doesn't 'exactly' translate, it just cherry picks one example where the Greek word for brother was used to mean something other than full biological brother, and then decides the same must apply to Jesus. James is referred to as Jesus' brother not only in the gospels, but also by Paul in his letters, the earliest written source about Jesus. The only reason to claim James was anything other than the full brother of Jesus is to fulfill a dogma that originates over a 100 years after his death.
The dogma I'm referring to is the perpetual virginity of Mary. There is nothing in the canonical gospels about Mary remaining a virgin, instead some even refer to his siblings. The earliest reference to perpetual virginity of Mary is in Protoevangelium of James which is estimated to be from around 150, so more than 100 years, and it wasn't the official church position until a few hundred years after that.The four canonical gospels, Matthew, Mark, Luke and John are said to have been written between a.d 66 and 110. If Jesus died in adulthood, (some say he began to preach around 30 y/o) then that just isn't accurate.
I see we have a cromwellian solo scripturist here.The dogma I'm referring to is the perpetual virginity of Mary. There is nothing in the canonical gospels about Mary remaining a virgin, instead some even refer to his siblings. The earliest reference to perpetual virginity of Mary is in Protoevangelium of James which is estimated to be from around 150, so more than 100 years, and it wasn't the official church position until a few hundred years after that.
Were they born from Mary Jesus' mother? Like widows and widowers was a big thing. Not that far-fetched or hard to imagine.The dogma I'm referring to is the perpetual virginity of Mary. There is nothing in the canonical gospels about Mary remaining a virgin, instead some even refer to his siblings. The earliest reference to perpetual virginity of Mary is in Protoevangelium of James which is estimated to be from around 150, so more than 100 years, and it wasn't the official church position until a few hundred years after that.