Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

The US secret war

I don't have a problem with the CIA opening up interrogation camps in Europe. It has to have the total compliance of the host country. It seems like the US was spending a lot of cash after 9-11. And its possible some of these camps were opened. If any type of physical torute occurred I would be dead set against these camps.

But its something the US works out with the host country. If such camps exist in say Poland or Romaina its an agreement we work out with them. Its no business of Germany or France how these countries conduct their foreign policy.

It will pass. European Intelligence agencies don't sit around playing tiddlewinks themselves. And except for Iraq, America and Europe seem to play very well together on terrorism.
 
mears said:
But its something the US works out with the host country. If such camps exist in say Poland or Romaina its an agreement we work out with them. Its no business of Germany or France how these countries conduct their foreign policy.


Poland is now an EU member and Romania has applied to become an EU member - this means they've signed up to the European Convention on Human Rights which means things like having secret CIA torture chambers in your country are a no-no - and as fellow EU members it is indeed the business of France and Germany.
 
mears said:
I don't have a problem with the CIA opening up interrogation camps in Europe. It has to have the total compliance of the host country. It seems like the US was spending a lot of cash after 9-11. And its possible some of these camps were opened. If any type of physical torute occurred I would be dead set against these camps.

The words CIA and torture have very strong associations.

In fact they complement each other just as well as wine and cheese.

Except one is creative and the other destructive.
 
Er...

I beleive Africa Bombata now when he said there are a newtork of secret prisons throughout America. Now I'll read the article and think of something good to say.
 
Yossarian said:
Poland is now an EU member and Romania has applied to become an EU member - this means they've signed up to the European Convention on Human Rights which means things like having secret CIA torture chambers in your country are a no-no - and as fellow EU members it is indeed the business of France and Germany.

Torture camps? Those are your words sport. And their foreign policy is hardly the business of France and Germany.
 
mears said:
Torture camps? Those are your words sport. And their foreign policy is hardly the business of France and Germany.

"You don't like my principles? Then I have others"

That should be written on your headstone Mears - No morals, no principles, no nothing.
 
mears said:
Torture camps? Those are your words sport. And their foreign policy is hardly the business of France and Germany.

There are CIA / US Govt torture camps being run in various parts of the world I think that has been proved now.

And as members of the EU we are all responsible to a considerable extent for each others foreign policy.
 
mears said:
Torture camps? Those are your words sport. And their foreign policy is hardly the business of France and Germany.
err...no. try again.
They are also the words - and testimony - of tony Lagouranis, and also Frank Ford.
makes you feel proud, huh, that this is being done in your bame and with your taxes?
ETA: please everyone - read those links. What i read there made me feel physically sick.
 
mears said:
I don't have a problem with the CIA opening up interrogation camps in Europe. It has to have the total compliance of the host country. It seems like the US was spending a lot of cash after 9-11. And its possible some of these camps were opened. If any type of physical torute occurred I would be dead set against these camps.

But its something the US works out with the host country. If such camps exist in say Poland or Romaina its an agreement we work out with them. Its no business of Germany or France how these countries conduct their foreign policy.

It will pass. European Intelligence agencies don't sit around playing tiddlewinks themselves. And except for Iraq, America and Europe seem to play very well together on terrorism.

Oh, the blinding hypocrisy of it all!!!!!! Weren't you the one bitching about this sort of thing taking place in other countries? Yes, you were and you used the issue of human rights abuses to bolster you feeble defence of US foreign policy.

Talk about dishonest. :rolleyes:
 
So mears - why is the CIA flying its (names unlisted, held without charge, denied visits from the red cross) prisoners to secret camps and/or lending them to countries who routinely practice torture?

And the issue of a country running an global wide network of gulags and torture camps is very much the business of everybody on the planet who values basic human decency and codes of behaviour.

You're an utter hypocrite and we'll force your words down your throat next time you shed your crcocodile tears and faux outrage over the human rights abuses of Amercia's next bette noir de jour.
 
mears said:
Torture camps? Those are your words sport.

They were posted by me under my name, whose fucking words did you think they were?

And their foreign policy is hardly the business of France and Germany.

And you respond to my explanation of why it's the business of France and Germany by...saying the exact same thing again.

I refer you to my previous post for all further discussion on the matter, I don't fancy getting sucked into a loop of idiocy with you.
 
Kaka Tim said:
So mears - why is the CIA flying its (names unlisted, held without charge, denied visits from the red cross) prisoners to secret camps and/or lending them to countries who routinely practice torture?

And the issue of a country running an global wide network of gulags and torture camps is very much the business of everybody on the planet who values basic human decency and codes of behaviour.

You're an utter hypocrite and we'll force your words down your throat next time you shed your crcocodile tears and faux outrage over the human rights abuses of Amercia's next bette noir de jour.

They are flying prisoners around to get information to prevent attacks similar to those in London, Madrid or New York. American laws are very stringent on bringing foreign prisoners to the US. Taking them to Guantonimo is time consuming and expensive. So they need a place to interrogate these boys. If Eastern European countries provide the space than more power to them.

Again, "torture" camp and "gulags" are one thing, interrogation camps quite another. You make it sound as if thousands of people are being tortured around the world at the hands of the CIA. Ther is no evidence of such a scenario. Its just a play on words.
 
mears said:
They are flying prisoners around to get information to prevent attacks similar to those in London, Madrid or New York. American laws are very stringent on bringing foreign prisoners to the US. Taking them to Guantonimo is time consuming and expensive. So they need a place to interrogate these boys. If Eastern European countries provide the space than more power to them.

Again, "torture" camp and "gulags" are one thing, interrogation camps quite another. You make it sound as if thousands of people are being tortured around the world at the hands of the CIA. Ther is no evidence of such a scenario. Its just a play on words.
read the fucking links above again, numbnuts - torture is being practiced by your country's services.
 
Tell me mears, how would you like to be held down by four goons while a fifth one cuts your penis with a scalpel?
 
and no-one should believe this policy of torture is a post-twin towers policy
From 1950 to 1962, the CIA conducted massive, secret research into coercion and the malleability of human consciousness which, by the late fifties, was costing a billion dollars a year. Many Americans have heard about the most outlandish and least successful aspect of this research -- the testing of LSD on unsuspecting subjects.
 
mears said:
They are flying prisoners around to get information to prevent attacks similar to those in London, Madrid or New York. American laws are very stringent on bringing foreign prisoners to the US. Taking them to Guantonimo is time consuming and expensive. So they need a place to interrogate these boys. If Eastern European countries provide the space than more power to them.

Again, "torture" camp and "gulags" are one thing, interrogation camps quite another. You make it sound as if thousands of people are being tortured around the world at the hands of the CIA. Ther is no evidence of such a scenario. Its just a play on words.

'Evidence' obtained through the use of torture is notoriously unreliable since the person being tortured will say anything to get the pain to stop - or did that ever cross your tiny mind? Furthermore, the regime of torture and "renditions" (possibly the most bizarre euphemism ever used) have signally failed to stop any terror attacks. If you think such methods have been useful then you do not live in the real world.
 
nino_savatte said:
That will be MK Ultra, which may or may not, have led to the mental disintegration and death of Paul Robeson. :( :mad:

Ultra and/or its' siblings, anyway.

Programmes derided by mears' spiritual predecessors as "fantasy" and "conspiracy theory" that turned out to be true.

You know what's odd about this "distinction" between torture and interrogation? I remember making a series of posts back (IIRC) in late 2003, mentioning how laws against torture were being circumvented by re-labeling it as a form of "interrogation" and how, whatever you decided to call the act of using pain and psychological pressure to extract information, it was the same thing, and derived roughly the same percentage of usable intel.

Amazing how millions of people can be lulled and millions of consciences salved by a bit of re-branding, isn't it? :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
 
ViolentPanda said:
Ultra and/or its' siblings, anyway.

Programmes derided by mears' spiritual predecessors as "fantasy" and "conspiracy theory" that turned out to be true.

You know what's odd about this "distinction" between torture and interrogation? I remember making a series of posts back (IIRC) in late 2003, mentioning how laws against torture were being circumvented by re-labeling it as a form of "interrogation" and how, whatever you decided to call the act of using pain and psychological pressure to extract information, it was the same thing, and derived roughly the same percentage of usable intel.

Amazing how millions of people can be lulled and millions of consciences salved by a bit of re-branding, isn't it? :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

Exactly and you are right to use the word "rebranding" to describe the redefinition of torture.

I expect mears to change the subject or to chuck out his oft used phrase.
 
Red Jezza said:
I never knew. just googled it.
FUCKING HELL!!!!
:eek: :mad:

The man who actually developed the programme had second thoughts about it all. He was later found dead on the pavement, after allegedly leaping to his death. It is reckoned that he too had been poisoned. I can't remember his name off the top of my head but I'll try and find it.
 
Red Jezza said:
yes please do try nino. i've clearly got a bit of reading to do on this. I'm stunned
Nino could be talking about Dr Frank Olson (that's an "o", not an "e" in the last bit). He was given LSD and then apparently suicided, but his fall and the results of his post mortem weren't consistent with a jump but a push.

Ultra was actually headed by Dr Sidney Gottlieb, who didn't commit suicide but died of pneumonia at the age of 80. G-d must have indeed loved the prick.

*****

Be warned, Jezza.

You're going to have to separate the wheat from the chaff on Ultra as every conspiranoid and his aunt has a theory about the whole sorry mess.
 
Back
Top Bottom