Actually, the NeoCons' preference is for DIRTY-WARS!!!!!Mickey2star said:
mears said:I don't have a problem
mears said:the CIA opening up interrogation camps
In the future, could you please add a short synopsis of the article (and preferably your opinion) so people know what it's about?Mickey2star said:
mears said:But its something the US works out with the host country. If such camps exist in say Poland or Romaina its an agreement we work out with them. Its no business of Germany or France how these countries conduct their foreign policy.
mears said:I don't have a problem with the CIA opening up interrogation camps in Europe. It has to have the total compliance of the host country. It seems like the US was spending a lot of cash after 9-11. And its possible some of these camps were opened. If any type of physical torute occurred I would be dead set against these camps.
Yossarian said:Poland is now an EU member and Romania has applied to become an EU member - this means they've signed up to the European Convention on Human Rights which means things like having secret CIA torture chambers in your country are a no-no - and as fellow EU members it is indeed the business of France and Germany.
mears said:Torture camps? Those are your words sport. And their foreign policy is hardly the business of France and Germany.
mears said:Torture camps? Those are your words sport. And their foreign policy is hardly the business of France and Germany.
err...no. try again.mears said:Torture camps? Those are your words sport. And their foreign policy is hardly the business of France and Germany.
mears said:I don't have a problem with the CIA opening up interrogation camps in Europe. It has to have the total compliance of the host country. It seems like the US was spending a lot of cash after 9-11. And its possible some of these camps were opened. If any type of physical torute occurred I would be dead set against these camps.
But its something the US works out with the host country. If such camps exist in say Poland or Romaina its an agreement we work out with them. Its no business of Germany or France how these countries conduct their foreign policy.
It will pass. European Intelligence agencies don't sit around playing tiddlewinks themselves. And except for Iraq, America and Europe seem to play very well together on terrorism.
mears said:Torture camps? Those are your words sport.
And their foreign policy is hardly the business of France and Germany.
Kaka Tim said:So mears - why is the CIA flying its (names unlisted, held without charge, denied visits from the red cross) prisoners to secret camps and/or lending them to countries who routinely practice torture?
And the issue of a country running an global wide network of gulags and torture camps is very much the business of everybody on the planet who values basic human decency and codes of behaviour.
You're an utter hypocrite and we'll force your words down your throat next time you shed your crcocodile tears and faux outrage over the human rights abuses of Amercia's next bette noir de jour.
read the fucking links above again, numbnuts - torture is being practiced by your country's services.mears said:They are flying prisoners around to get information to prevent attacks similar to those in London, Madrid or New York. American laws are very stringent on bringing foreign prisoners to the US. Taking them to Guantonimo is time consuming and expensive. So they need a place to interrogate these boys. If Eastern European countries provide the space than more power to them.
Again, "torture" camp and "gulags" are one thing, interrogation camps quite another. You make it sound as if thousands of people are being tortured around the world at the hands of the CIA. Ther is no evidence of such a scenario. Its just a play on words.
From 1950 to 1962, the CIA conducted massive, secret research into coercion and the malleability of human consciousness which, by the late fifties, was costing a billion dollars a year. Many Americans have heard about the most outlandish and least successful aspect of this research -- the testing of LSD on unsuspecting subjects.
mears said:They are flying prisoners around to get information to prevent attacks similar to those in London, Madrid or New York. American laws are very stringent on bringing foreign prisoners to the US. Taking them to Guantonimo is time consuming and expensive. So they need a place to interrogate these boys. If Eastern European countries provide the space than more power to them.
Again, "torture" camp and "gulags" are one thing, interrogation camps quite another. You make it sound as if thousands of people are being tortured around the world at the hands of the CIA. Ther is no evidence of such a scenario. Its just a play on words.
Red Jezza said:and no-one should believe this policy of torture is a post-twin towers policy
nino_savatte said:That will be MK Ultra, which may or may not, have led to the mental disintegration and death of Paul Robeson.
ViolentPanda said:Ultra and/or its' siblings, anyway.
Programmes derided by mears' spiritual predecessors as "fantasy" and "conspiracy theory" that turned out to be true.
You know what's odd about this "distinction" between torture and interrogation? I remember making a series of posts back (IIRC) in late 2003, mentioning how laws against torture were being circumvented by re-labeling it as a form of "interrogation" and how, whatever you decided to call the act of using pain and psychological pressure to extract information, it was the same thing, and derived roughly the same percentage of usable intel.
Amazing how millions of people can be lulled and millions of consciences salved by a bit of re-branding, isn't it?
Red Jezza said:
Nino could be talking about Dr Frank Olson (that's an "o", not an "e" in the last bit). He was given LSD and then apparently suicided, but his fall and the results of his post mortem weren't consistent with a jump but a push.Red Jezza said:yes please do try nino. i've clearly got a bit of reading to do on this. I'm stunned