If that was true, the WHO would have called it the stunc variant.Apparently the latest anti-vaxxer claim is that the powers that be are taunting them with the name of the new variant, because "omicron" is an anagram of "moronic."
Holy shit these people are omicron.
I really hope that’s true.Apparently the latest anti-vaxxer claim is that the powers that be are taunting them with the name of the new variant, because "omicron" is an anagram of "moronic."
Holy shit these people are omicron.
Or the Watt variant. Or the Newark variant.If that was true, the WHO would have called it the stunc variant.
Apparently the latest anti-vaxxer claim is that the powers that be are taunting them with the name of the new variant, because "omicron" is an anagram of "moronic."
Holy shit these people are omicron.
Newark
Overlord villains just can’t help doing anagrams even when they know it gives them away.Apparently the latest anti-vaxxer claim is that the powers that be are taunting them with the name of the new variant, because "omicron" is an anagram of "moronic."
Holy shit these people are omicron.
Apparently the latest anti-vaxxer claim is that the powers that be are taunting them with the name of the new variant, because "omicron" is an anagram of "moronic."
"Lambda" is of course an anagram of "lab mad(e)", proof that the virus was made by the illuminati.
"Delta" is an anagram of "T. Lead", short for tetra-ethyl lead, the additive that used to be put in petrol. It was named as such because drinking tetra-ethyl lead (a preparation known as "lead tea") is actually the cure for the virus. You can see why the green woke Dems brigade wanted it banned so we would be left without a cure when the lizards turned up!
How could we monetise this??You do realise that if a proper conspiraloon were to chance upon this thread, it'd be only a matter of minutes before these ponderings went viral across the loonspud community
Somesort of pay per click?How could we monetise this??
To which the only answer can be, "I'd rather be classed as a junkie by some judgemental cunt who'd fail Logic 101 if they even bothered to take it, than die of a disease that a couple of vaccinations stand a good chance of preventing."Irrefutable logic:
These people are just fucking thick, aren’t they?Irrefutable logic:
Worse...they're wilfully thick.These people are just fucking thick, aren’t they?
Irrefutable logic:
He's deleted it now and claimed it was a way of weeding out pro vaxxers so he can block us.Irrefutable logic:
That shows a degree of self-awareness I'm not sure the possess.Apparently the latest anti-vaxxer claim is that the powers that be are taunting them with the name of the new variant, because "omicron" is an anagram of "moronic."
Holy shit these people are omicron.
It's good to know that somebody's in charge, though.Saw this while punishing my eyes looking at his Twitter feed.
View attachment 298692
I'm very much looking forward to March 2022 when they impose a diet based on the Codex Alimentarius, sounds very Harry Potter-esque and exciting. I hope they have good stocks of it in my local Asda, and I'm assuming it'll be free as money would have been dematerialized and all debts, loans, and credt cancelled. It's going to be a very exciting 2022, although the banning of all global medicines is a bit of a downer tbh. Swings and roundabouts though.
In phase six, how will they obligate everyone to vaccinate annually or semi-annually whilst simultaneously banning all global medicines?Saw this while punishing my eyes looking at his Twitter feed.
View attachment 298692
I'm very much looking forward to March 2022 when they impose a diet based on the Codex Alimentarius, sounds very Harry Potter-esque and exciting. I hope they have good stocks of it in my local Asda, and I'm assuming it'll be free as money would have been dematerialized and all debts, loans, and credt cancelled. It's going to be a very exciting 2022, although the banning of all global medicines is a bit of a downer tbh. Swings and roundabouts though.
He believes covid is real? Ziobiofash shill.Saw this while punishing my eyes looking at his Twitter feed.
I'm very much looking forward to March 2022 when they impose a diet based on the Codex Alimentarius, sounds very Harry Potter-esque and exciting. I hope they have good stocks of it in my local Asda, and I'm assuming it'll be free as money would have been dematerialized and all debts, loans, and credt cancelled. It's going to be a very exciting 2022, although the banning of all global medicines is a bit of a downer tbh. Swings and roundabouts though.
I'm disappointed to learn that the killjoys of the New South Wales Law Society are trying to take away the right of Australians to be represented by this genius in court:Saw this while punishing my eyes looking at his Twitter feed.
I'm very much looking forward to March 2022 when they impose a diet based on the Codex Alimentarius, sounds very Harry Potter-esque and exciting. I hope they have good stocks of it in my local Asda, and I'm assuming it'll be free as money would have been dematerialized and all debts, loans, and credt cancelled. It's going to be a very exciting 2022, although the banning of all global medicines is a bit of a downer tbh. Swings and roundabouts though.
A Sydney lawyer who unsuccessfully challenged the NSW COVID-19 vaccine mandate is fighting to overturn a finding that he engaged in unsatisfactory professional conduct, after he suggested Victorians should avoid wearing masks and challenge the fines they receive in court.
Nathan Buckley, the principal of G&B Lawyers, has been a vocal critic of various public health orders on his firm’s Facebook and Twitter pages, where he has solicited participants for class action lawsuits and secured more than $575,000 in donations.
On Monday, the NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal was told a complaint had been made about Mr Buckley’s behaviour, with the Law Society of New South Wales making a finding in May this year that he had engaged in unsatisfactory professional conduct.
Mr Buckley is seeking for the tribunal to conduct an administrative review of this decision. The finding related to three posts on Facebook, including a post in July last year in which Mr Buckley offered “free legal advice to all Victorians”.
“Don’t wear a mask ... Every single one of you 6.359 million Victorians can challenge the fines in court,” the post said. “The Victorian government won’t fight you in court. It is far too expensive for them to do so.”
Mr Buckley later removed the post and clarified that it had not been “an expression of law or the provision of legal advice”, but merely “the expression of my own personal political beliefs”...
In recent days, Mr Buckley has separately been informed that the Law Society is proposing to cancel his practising certificate due to social media posts made by G&B Lawyers, including some made in the aftermath of the firm’s unsuccessful challenge to the NSW public health orders restricting the activities of residents who have not been vaccinated against COVID-19.
On October 15, the day the vaccine mandate judgment was handed down, G&B Lawyers wrote on Facebook and Twitter: “Justice Beech-Jones today said that no one in NSW has any rights. No one has a right to bodily integrity. He basically said it is ok to kill anyone you like.”
When a Twitter user responded to this, asking if it meant someone could cut the testicles off paedophiles, the G&B Lawyers account responded: “You’re correct based on today’s judgment. Go for it. Pedos have no rights.”
Another Twitter user asked if the judgment gave them a green light to go on a “rampage” against people who have wronged them. G&B wrote: “Yeah. [Justice] Beech-Jones said no one has any rights in New South Wales. Do as you please.”
The Law Society wrote to Mr Buckley on October 20, arguing the posts demonstrate that Mr Buckley is unable to fulfil the inherent requirements of an Australian legal practitioner. Mr Buckley was invited to respond to this contention in writing by November 5.
Mr Buckley posted the document on social media and launched a fundraiser, which has raised more than $17,000 for the fight to keep his practising certificate.
He wrote that the Law Society “want to silence me for pointing out the truth” that the health minister “can make public health orders sentencing unvaccinated people to their death”.
can’t wait for debts to be cancelled. Annoyed that being Bluetooth enabled is not part of the overall package thoSaw this while punishing my eyes looking at his Twitter feed.
View attachment 298692
I'm very much looking forward to March 2022 when they impose a diet based on the Codex Alimentarius, sounds very Harry Potter-esque and exciting. I hope they have good stocks of it in my local Asda, and I'm assuming it'll be free as money would have been dematerialized and all debts, loans, and credt cancelled. It's going to be a very exciting 2022, although the banning of all global medicines is a bit of a downer tbh. Swings and roundabouts though.
I'm disappointed to learn that the killjoys of the New South Wales Law Society are trying to take away the right of Australians to be represented by this genius in court:
Lawyer who challenged COVID-19 health orders fights unsatisfactory professional conduct finding
Sydney solicitor Nathan Buckley, who has launched various challenges against public health orders, has brought a case in the NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal.www.smh.com.au