Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

the sir jimmy savile obe thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Bullshit speculation about a poster being a sockpuppet without proffering any supporting evidence is proper dickhead behaviour. And any poster subject to such bullshit is perfectly entitled to defend themselves without nobheads crying about the thread going off topic.
So's flinging accusations around about being bullied without supporting evidence.
 
It's not about disagreement .
Disagreement is not bullying.
Maybe if you read existentialists posts without prejudice you'd see.

and now you are trying to deflect the complaints i have made about your posts and behavior onto existentialist, without addressing any of the comments I've made.

I think the first point is the most valid, with experience in the arena of supporting abuse victims, how can you be so unaware of the damaging effect of the myth that all 'proper victims' fight back?
 
Bullshit speculation about a poster being a sockpuppet without proffering any supporting evidence is proper dickhead behaviour. And any poster subject to such bullshit is perfectly entitled to defend themselves without nobheads crying about the thread going off topic.
TBF, the speculation is hardly surprising, if a poster is demonstrating a similarly controversial posting style to someone else. It's hardly as if she was being accused and hounded about it, however she might choose to characterise it.

And, in case you hadn't noticed, most of her banging on has been nothing to do with being accused of being a sockpuppet.
 

an wot?

TBF, the speculation is hardly surprising, if a poster is demonstrating a similarly controversial posting style to someone else. It's hardly as if she was being accused and hounded about it, however she might choose to characterise it.

A similar posting style to who though? Never been made clear that. And that's what I'm on about WRT lack of evidence.

<snip>
And, in case you hadn't noticed, most of her banging on has been nothing to do with being accused of being a sockpuppet.


A fair bit of it has been & I'm not keen on seeing it. Urban at it's worst IMO.
 
A similar posting style to who though? Never been made clear that. And that's what I'm on about WRT lack of evidence.
It has been. A particular poster was identified on a particular thread. I don't recall the name, but it's ^^^ up there somewhere, AFAICR.

And another poster has pointed out that this very poster has previous form for this kind of thing. I haven't checked that out, so I am not going to vouch for its accuracy, but I'm inclined to believe the poster.

A fair bit of it has been & I'm not keen on seeing it. Urban at it's worst IMO.
Very little has been about the sockpuppet thing. Most of what she has gone on about has been me, and the way in which I refused to engage with her strategy of PMing me, and responses I have made to her on this thread. I have yet to see anything beyond some very slanted recollections of what I wrote, and some outrageously selective extracts from it in support of her claims, so I am quite happy to take what she is saying with a great pinch of salt, confident in the knowledge that anyone with any critical faculties whatsoever will be doing the same thing.

The sock puppet thing was, from the perspective of this thread, nothing more than a brisk aside, and not the big deal you're making of it.
 
tbh, most of her banging on has been about the fact that some posters dare to disagree with her. they challenge her statements, they ask her to justify her assertions and when she accuses them of bullying as a result of their temerity, they don't promptly roll over and play dead.
 
I'm not understanding this sock puppet. Do u mean that ppl have been banned from here in the past but they come back with new usernames/emails pretending to b a new person? Or that someone who is still a member and not banned, has created several accounts, maybe to back up their point of view on threads?
 
if you that's urban at its worst you've barely scratched the surface of the boards

Stop acting.

It has been. A particular poster was identified on a particular thread. I don't recall the name, but it's ^^^ up there somewhere, AFAICR.

And another poster has pointed out that this very poster has previous form for this kind of thing. I haven't checked that out, so I am not going to vouch for its accuracy, but I'm inclined to believe the poster.

I'm inclined to think it's bullshit given the complete absence of any supporting evidence.





<snip>The sock puppet thing was, from the perspective of this thread, nothing more than a brisk aside, and not the big deal you're making of it.

I'm making a big deal of fuck all - Unfounded accusations of sockpuppetry are a wankers trick. That's all I'm saying. End of.
 
And another poster has pointed out that this very poster has previous form for this kind of thing. I haven't checked that out, so I am not going to vouch for its accuracy, but I'm inclined to believe the poster.

certainly has form for leaping into accusation of bullying when people dare to disagree with her.

and some very interesting notions of what feminism is.

alongside claims of expert knowledge.

sort of fits with the claims of expert knowledge and interesting notions of how victims respond to abuse.
 
I'm not understanding this sock puppet. Do u mean that ppl have been banned from here in the past but they come back with new usernames/emails pretending to b a new person? Or that someone who is still a member and not banned, has created several accounts, maybe to back up their point of view on threads?
"Sock puppet" usually refers to a second (or third, etc) identity that a user on a board has set up: the name comes from the idea of someone having a sock puppet on their hand and having a conversation with it.

Quite often, people who create sock puppet accounts use them to create the impression that their particular viewpoint has other people agreeing with it.
 
QUOTE="existentialist, post: 13264615, member: 46721"]"Sock puppet" usually refers to a second (or third, etc) identity that a user on a board has set up: the name comes from the idea of someone having a sock puppet on their hand and having a conversation with it.

Quite often, people who create sock puppet accounts use them to create the impression that their particular viewpoint has other people agreeing with it.[/QUOTE]
Thats what I understood it to mean but I've seen talked of banned ppl coming back so wondered if this was what was meant. Tbh I haven't looked at rules for getting banned so I better do that!
 
Thats what I understood it to mean but I've seen talked of banned ppl coming back so wondered if this was what was meant. Tbh I haven't looked at rules for getting banned so I better do that!
Yeah, these terms get their definitions stretched, and banned returners generally don't come back with their original IDs (for obvious reasons!). But they're not really sock puppets in that case.

You will want to check out the forum rules and FAQ, which you will find here: http://www.urban75.net/forums/help

(our mutual friend bubbles might also want to do a little reading up, to ensure she doesn't do anything silly like post a PM or something else)
 
Yeah, these terms get their definitions stretched, and banned returners generally don't come back with their original IDs (for obvious reasons!). But they're not really sock puppets in that case.

You will want to check out the forum rules and FAQ, which you will find here: http://www.urban75.net/forums/help

(our mutual friend bubbles might also want to do a little reading up, to ensure she doesn't do anything silly like post a PM or something else)

Thank u i will go check
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom