Probably as its part of pandemic action planning and risk assessment which larger charities and official bodies are nornally involved with. I know in previous pandemic training exercises that the Council, Police, Health, Third Sector etc that I was involved in this came up, also school closures, custody officers being infected, community cohesion., child welfare concerns etc. So if you are thinking it came out of the blue no.The extra money (which as always in the case of domestic abuse is insufficient for an area thats never been properly funded and frequently cut, would have been earmarked weeks ago and released as soon as Councils , DV charites and Police sent in the data.was this not highlighted by charities and official bodies in advance of the lock down
How many people did the government, social services and the police let down in the course of 3 weeks
Crime is down because its not be monitored
Nonsense, in case of emergencies there is always Chris Grayling
What has happened to him? I mean, he must be fucking something up in the background, out of sight of the media...They are really missing him at the moment; if this had happened under May then he would have done every press conference, making a horrific pigs ear of every second but staying there whilst the rest of the government sheltered behind him. Probably its a good thing for the country that he isn't a minister though, as more people would have died though from putting their foot through the TV.
What has happened to him? I mean, he must be fucking something up in the background, out of sight of the media...
There was a doctor from Bradford on the BBC a little while ago really criticising this. He basically said anyone who uses the phrase "I'm sorry you feel that way" is lying they aren't sorry and it's not an apology.That non-apology about insufficient PPE was just insulting to everyone. Absolutely appalling.
I suppose he'd be useful on an intelligence committee as a kind of warning - "and THAT points at the gleaming Graylingpate is what lack of intelligence looks like. This is why we need intelligence".Going to be on the Intelligence and Security Committee of the Commons, apparently. Though he could just have been told to guard a bee in the basement.
I'm a bit of a twitter dunce, so am struggling to look at Hewertson's posting history to find out whether she's doing irony, or is for real...
Oh good. Then I shall follow herSadly real I think
I'm a bit of a twitter dunce, so am struggling to look at Hewertson's posting history to find out whether she's doing irony, or is for real...
You're right: there were a LOT of photos of her with her tits. Which is partly what made me think it might be a spoof account . Perhaps I just thought that Tory women didn't have tits...19 year old Instagram Tory Brexit party girl with big tits and blond hair.
I googled so you don't have to.
Thanks for that.
The way you said that suggests you think that her gender has been a feature of the criticism. Which hasn't been my experience...There are better ways of critiquing women in politics than some of the comments on this page.
There are better ways of critiquing women in politics than some of the comments on this page.
The way you said that suggests you think that her gender has been a feature of the criticism. Which hasn't been my experience...
The 'her' in that last quote not referring to Patel but then keybored's point was about women in politics in general.You're right: there were a LOT of photos of her with her tits. Which is partly what made me think it might be a spoof account . Perhaps I just thought that Tory women didn't have tits...
I'm sorry, but if those comments about someone who purports to comment about politics on Twitter are being used to suggest that gender is being used about Patel, then that's bullshit.The 'her' in that last quote not referring to Patel but then keybored's point was about women in politics in general.
Wasn't gonna single you out because a few posts on this page are borderline Nuts Magazine, but do you really think political affiliation and bust size are linked?I'm sorry, but if those comments about someone who purports to comment about politics on Twitter are being used to suggest that gender is being used about Patel, then that's bullshit.
Someone posts about Patel on Twitter - someone who, when one goes to find out if it's for real or not, has a linked Instagram page full of photos in which her cleavage features heavily. To comment on that, as an aspect of whoever that person is, is NOT commenting on "women in politics". At worst, it's commenting on some idiot who might think of herself as a "woman in politics".
I have always been very careful when slagging off politicians like Patel not to let her gender (or her ethnicity) be part of the issue, because it's irrelevant.
Anyone who's trying to conflate anything else I say with the idea that I am doing otherwise is reaching pretty fucking hard. And can get stuffed, frankly.
Perhaps I just thought that Tory women didn't have tits...