Thanks
Edie, more staff would greatly reduce those costs then.
I also see a lot of waste. It is not uncommon for clients to have a collection of walking sticks, walking frames and the like, when one of each will do. They invariably get binned when the client dies or moves.
If more money were spent on social care, on meals on wheels, on day centres, if clients were better looked after and had more human contact, I am sure it would mean fewer hospital trips.
Because of pressure on beds and targets, clients are often discharged before they are ready or before social services are ready for them. I have lost count of the clients I have helped in the last year
who had been discharged from hospital and within 24 hours they are returning to hospital; more beds required.
Doctors, social services and hospitals often compete against each other to protect their much needed resources. People ring up doctors to be told they need to wait a few days for an appointment.
In the meantime, they get sicker and end up in hospital because their infection or what ever has deteriorated for want of early intervention. I have known doctors who have told clients we are too
busy to see you now, if you think you need treatment call an ambulance. Similarly, I have called 111 out of hours for a district nurse to sort out a catheter or similar, no other symptons, to be told
call an ambulance. I know they err on the side of caution but thats ridiculous.
Simply reiterating what others have said, more funding, more staff across the board and more hospital beds.