andysays
Love and solidarity
Or maybe that place in Spain (or is it Portugal) where that other guy wanders round naked, but in towns rather than rambling.
Do you mean the one from Barcelona? I think it's called Ramblasing
Or maybe that place in Spain (or is it Portugal) where that other guy wanders round naked, but in towns rather than rambling.
Not sure. It might be earlier in the threadDo you mean the one from Barcelona? I think it's called Ramblasing
If he were just wandering around naked in one small town, it'd be different. People would know he was harmless, know where to avoid him and be able to tell their kids "oh, that's just Naked Nobby" and maybe chat about it later, or maybe not, since he'd be just a local eccentric.
Though I'm not sure he could be persuaded from not wandering naked past the local primary school even then, since his last conviction was for doing just that after the cops offered to give him a lift - naked - past the school then let him out, still naked, and he refused.
It's wandering all over the country that makes it different. Most people seeing him wouldn't know why he's doing it. They'd likely assume he was either a danger to someone else - that if he could do that, what else could he do? - or think he was a danger to himself, either fucked up on drugs or mentally ill. So I bet lots and lots of people have actually called the police because of him.
I called the cops on a naked bloke once, when he was lying next to a kids' playpark, because I thought it likely that he was off his head to do something like that and also that he was very vulnerable to assault or theft (he had a bag and a phone in his hand).
I also wouldn't particularly want to see a naked stranger in an unexpected place shortly after I'd been sexually assaulted. He wouldn't be safe old Naked Nobby, he'd be a grown man whose history and intentions I don't know. I would be the one who had to leave because I felt very unsafe.
And I wouldn't want to be helping a kid recover from sexual abuse and then have it put back a step due to mixed messages about when it's ok for a grown man to let kids see his penis.
I haven't noticed that being a significant part of any reports I've read on this.
Can anyone who's followed this story more closely confirm or refute?
I once got caught pissing on a church door by the vicar. One of my finer moments.
You're so right. The numbers of people raped and abused is SO low that this man can never have exposed himself to them while wandering the country. And there is no way anyone could ever have been afraid for his wellbeing enough to call the police. The police were alerted by homing beacons.
This thread has it all
Stranger danger
Safe spaces
Unashamed sexual nudity advertising being a lesser evil than an eccentric naked rambler
Jail sentencing
Paedo mania
Religious or other morality
Lone naked rambler more of a threat than mass naked bike rides
There must be a few I've left off the list
You missed the pun in my post #691
It's like living in Nazi GermanyDon't know why I bother...
It's like living in Nazi Germany
Nah, I fucked off sharpish.
This thread has it all
Stranger danger
Safe spaces
Unashamed sexual nudity advertising being a lesser evil than an eccentric naked rambler
Jail sentencing
Paedo mania
Religious or other morality
Lone naked rambler more of a threat than mass naked bike rides
There must be a few I've left off the list
You missed "showing your bits to whoever you like being more important than what they feel about it. Show your bits to a rape victim - that's OK." He's walking about in public so he HAS to be exposing himself to victims of rape, recent ones even. The odds of that not happening are astronomical.
So we take the piss out of that point of view. Even you do. It's really fucking weird. I honestly do not understand it from intelligent people like you.
So far there have been plenty of reasonable posts arguing why this guy shouldn't be indulged. I've yet to see a single post on here outlining a compelling reason why he should be.
Unashamed sexual nudity advertising being a lesser evil than an eccentric naked rambler
I haven't, and have seen reasonable cases on both sides.
Has anybody shown one example of equivalent levels of nudity (i.e full frontal) in mainstream advertising?
It's a standing jokey phrase for perceived oppression. A bit like being told to tidy your bedroom. That sort of thing.Is it? How?
As it happens, when I was in Berlin about 20 years ago, I was slightly surprised by the relative commonness and apparent acceptance of nakedness in public parks.
Quote me one from the Pro-Rambler side.
I'm drawing that comparison *now* (note, not earlier, if you'd read the thread; also you've inserted full frontal not me - because it suits you) because there's a prolific level of varying amounts of sexuality- based nudity in mainstream advertising - which I've given examples of - that simply does not attract the same levels of outrage compared to this.Why are you drawing this comparison? Has anybody shown one example of equivalent levels of nudity (i.e full frontal) in mainstream advertising?
Liar. It's the first time I've directly made that comparison.Nope. She's been asked a couple of times now though.
You've already categorically stated that you don't find any of them compelling ....
I said stranger danger. Perhaps I should have worded it your way. I'm a rape victim and I don't equate (a) nudity with sexual threat and/or (b) that strangers are the people that are the main perpetrators of rape and sexual abuse. If you've got stats otherwise, I'd be happy to look at them and perhaps revise my view.You missed "showing your bits to whoever you like being more important than what they feel about it. Show your bits to a rape victim - that's OK." He's walking about in public so he HAS to be exposing himself to victims of rape, recent ones even. The odds of that not happening are astronomical.
So we take the piss out of that point of view. Even you do. It's really fucking weird. I honestly do not understand it from intelligent people like you.
Which do you find compelling?