And now he weighs into the ethics of Social Work.
http://www.standard.co.uk/news/poli...d-pledges-to-shakeup-social-care-8934169.html
“In too many cases, social work training involves idealistic students being told that the individuals with whom they will work have been disempowered by society.
They will be encouraged to see these individuals as victims of social injustice whose fate is overwhelmingly decreed by the economic forces and inherent inequalities which scar our society.”
He said this approach fails to make people stand on their own two feet and risks “explaining away” substance abuse, domestic violence and personal irresponsibility."
Yes. Yes I do think that, Gove. Only someone with a calcified soul could ignore the evidence me and my colleagues bear witness to on a daily basis. Understanding these forces does not condone poor personal choices. He's creating an opening to start introducing his fucked up worldview into a sector already under immense pressure.
The word "cunt" doesn't really cover it.
Grr.
I work in a not entirely unrelated profession, and I am well used to hearing these tired old platitudes being trotted out about the work I do, too. Any attempt to help someone understand how something in their background might be affecting their situation today is written off as "excusing", any attempt to work around the clearly unproductive ways in which people are attempting to cope with their lives seen as encouraging self-indulgence. It's a wonder the cunt didn't suggest that people should just "snap out of it", or "pull themselves together".
Truly, I never thought I would see the day where people in government would not only display their manifest ignorance on such a wide range of subjects they're so fucking clearly ignorant about, but would presume to dictate policy on the basis of that ignorance.
I am not saying that the caring professions are completely free from a tendency to identify with their clients sometimes, and I think that one of the advantages of my profession - counselling - is that the importance of maintaining clear boundaries between our attitudes and situations and those of our clients is hammered into us from the beginning of our training, which makes it a lot easier not to identify with them in that way. I think there are examples there that might serve other caring professions well - I have known social workers who I think have become either too closely identified with, or rather too judgemental off, their clients - but Gove's attack here is not a criticism of a few professionals who might need to nip and tuck a little in their professional way of being; it's a direct assault, ideologically motivated, on the idea that there is any solution to people's problems other than one in which they are simply coerced, financially or otherwise, into compliance.
Not much makes me physically nauseous, but reading this latest bit of pious vileness from Gove has achieved that.
In saying what he has said, he must know - as a former newspaper columnist himself - that he is doing little more than playing into the basest prejudices of the unthinking Daily Mail-reading hordes who so love to sit in judgement on anyone who, whether by accident of birth, or shortage of privilege, finds themselves "beneath" the self-considered lofty heights those cunts occupy.
*breaks things*
ETA: I am even more sickened by the fact that he has the gall to try and cite his own anecdotal experiences as some kind of justification for policy.