The Home Office and UK government policy concerning asylum seekers/Rwanda deportations
- Thread starter teqniq
- Start date
A380
How do I change this 'custom title' thing then?
Presumably she was planning to resign either on Monday or today and he wanted to stop her doing hat?
littlebabyjesus
one of Maxwell's demons
Tricky. Which sackable offence do you choose as your reason to sack someone? From a tory pov, laying into the police is probably a worse offence than being incompetent in getting nasty legislation through ('Ah well, at least she tried. Pesky judges'). 
Be interesting to hear if they dare criticise the Supreme Court over a unanimous judgement. No nut job dissenting opinion to fall back on.
Be interesting to hear if they dare criticise the Supreme Court over a unanimous judgement. No nut job dissenting opinion to fall back on.
A380
How do I change this 'custom title' thing then?
Tricky. Which sackable offence do you choose as your reason to sack someone? From a tory pov, laying into the police is probably a worse offence than being incompetent in getting nasty legislation through ('Ah well, at least she tried. Pesky judges').
Be interesting to hear if they dare criticise the Supreme Court over a unanimous judgement. No nut job dissenting opinion to fall back on.
Did you not see what Cameron and May did to the old bill? Party of law and order my arse…
Bahnhof Strasse
Met up with Hannah Courtoy a week next Tuesday
Tbf, and to quote Ian Hislop, most of the UK's criminals seem to be on the Tory back benches these days.
A380
How do I change this 'custom title' thing then?
Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
Given what's come out about the level of criminality within the police the last couple of years it's perhaps fair to say they didn't go far enough
A380
How do I change this 'custom title' thing then?
There was me thinking you knew your history.
Elpenor
Dancing as fast as I can
My MP is on that list.
Rare day at home on a Wednesday so I’ll look forward to watching PMQs
A380
How do I change this 'custom title' thing then?
Bahnhof Strasse
Met up with Hannah Courtoy a week next Tuesday
If each of those people guarantee to cover the costs of the claims made by those they seek to illegally deport I see no reason why we can't give John Redwood the keys to an old 747 and tell him to get on with it.
Bahnhof Strasse
Met up with Hannah Courtoy a week next Tuesday
If you don’t like our laws you should get out of our country, Lee Anderson told
Tory party deputy Chairman and future provincial pantomime villain Lee Anderson, has been told that if he doesn’t like the laws of this land, then he should go and live somewhere else.
newsthump.com
not-bono-ever
meh
Does Norman Tebbit still have his commercial licence ?
SpookyFrank
A cheap source of teeth for aquarium gravel
Everyone knows this Rwanda shit was Braverman's baby. This latest development might knock some of the wind out her incipient swivel-eyed rebellion. Probably not though. The court system, laws etc are just more woke liberal crap standing in the way of the obvious common sense plan to ship thousands of people to Africa against their will at exorbitant cost.
belboid
Exasperated, not angry.
Patel’s, actually. (Not that it really matters)
Jeff Robinson
Marxist-Lentilist: Jackboots and Jackfruit
Just watched and read the summary of the judgment, it's really really bad for the government. Unanimous decision against them by a pretty conservative Supreme Court deciding a very narrow legal issue (whether there are substantial grounds for believing that asylum seekers would face a real risk of ill-treatment by reason of Rwanda deporting them to the countries they fled from).
The summary judgment is basically 'on the one hand Suella says the Rwandan government made a pinky promise they won't deport people in such instances, on the other hand there's just mountains of evidence that they will':
Suella has been totally rekked.
The summary judgment is basically 'on the one hand Suella says the Rwandan government made a pinky promise they won't deport people in such instances, on the other hand there's just mountains of evidence that they will':
Suella has been totally rekked.
gosub
~#
nope far too old
Jeff Robinson
Marxist-Lentilist: Jackboots and Jackfruit
The Tory nut jobs are writhing around like slugs in salt.
The party of law and order?
scalyboy
They’re taking the piss now
Boris de Pfeffel Johnson: " Fuck business"
Lee Anderson: "Fuck the law"
Are we sure there hasn't been a deep-cover Stop The City or Class War faction infiltrating Tory HQ over the past few years?
Storm Fox
Trying the find the next noun to verb
I think 30p may be committing an offence under the Serious Crime Act 2007 for incitement or encouragement.
www.cps.gov.uk
But I'm not a lawyer, of course.
Inchoate offences | The Crown Prosecution Service
But I'm not a lawyer, of course.
Bahnhof Strasse
Met up with Hannah Courtoy a week next Tuesday
They're frothing about the ECHR, but the judge said that even without that the policy fails under our legal obligations to:
The United Nations (UN) Refugee Convention
The UN Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment
The UN International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights,
Other than that we're good to go
The United Nations (UN) Refugee Convention
The UN Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment
The UN International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights,
Other than that we're good to go
belboid
Exasperated, not angry.
and various parts of UK law that weren't simply incorporating EU policy. Oops.They're frothing about the ECHR, but the judge said that even without that the policy fails under our legal obligations to:
The United Nations (UN) Refugee Convention
The UN Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment
The UN International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights,
Other than that we're good to go
MickiQ
In My Defence I was left Unsupervised
The Rwanda Plan is Deader than Maggie T (may she burn in hell) . Yeah, Sevenbins can change the law and re-negotiate the treaty to make it lawful but by the time the law changes make it through Parliament and survive the inevitable trip through the courts, Sevenbins will have gone back to his mansion to count his shekels and many of the rest of them will be finding out first hand how unforgiving the DWP is.
I don't know if Starmer objects in principle to the plan (not sure Starmer knows if he objects or not) but whatever else he is, he's not stupid. He is not going to waste time, money or political capital in trying to resurrect something do dumb.
All this now is just posturing for the base.
The row it will cause with the EU (member or not) is just not worth it.
I don't know if Starmer objects in principle to the plan (not sure Starmer knows if he objects or not) but whatever else he is, he's not stupid. He is not going to waste time, money or political capital in trying to resurrect something do dumb.
All this now is just posturing for the base.
The ECHR is the really important one with proper legal clout but it doesn't matter. The UK isn't withdrawing from the ECHR just to placate the Tory backbenchers and to chuck out a probably very small number of immigrants.They're frothing about the ECHR, but the judge said that even without that the policy fails under our legal obligations to:
The United Nations (UN) Refugee Convention
The UN Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment
The UN International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights,
Other than that we're good to go
The row it will cause with the EU (member or not) is just not worth it.
Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
I was thinking of your memory
Similar threads
