No, but Hyndman certainly appears to have been a complex and interesting character. According to Bevir's analysis Hyndman's Tory radicalism infused much of his scientific/positivist interpretation of Marxist dialectics. He thus held to political/parliamentary reform as a means to socialism, and yearned for a return to 'the golden age' much like other tory radicals of the time. So a Marxist, reformist monarchist must have made an intriguing, if perhaps infuriating figure.
In his defence, in 1908 Hyndman wrote to the (ex) Fabian and christian socialist Holbrook Jackson saying:-
"
I have always been ready for nearly 28 years to co-operate with anyone who wished to bring about the formation of a thorough-going Socialist party in Great Britain." Yet he did not accept that such a party should dilute its Socialism to appease the trade unions, and went on to say..
"...now a Socialist Party, in the combined sense, is opposed by the I.L.P. in favour of the Parliamentary Labour Party."
I find the notion of 'where it all went wrong for British Socialism' and interesting topic to read around atm.