Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact
  • Hi Guest,
    We have now moved the boards to the new server hardware.
    Search will be impaired while it re-indexes the posts.
    See the thread in the Feedback forum for updates and feedback.
    Lazy Llama

*The Great U75 Politics Reading List Thread.

no i dare say - but I guess the Syriza leadership would have thought much the same before 2008

lol lol lol

200px-Roflcopter.gif
 
LRC *could* become one significant current in a wider left realignment into a force with some traction. It might not happen, but it's not unthinkable. I'm certainly not saying it is about to sweep aside the Labour leadership and govern FFS
 
LRC *could* become one significant current in a wider left realignment into a force with some traction. It might not happen, but it's not unthinkable. I'm certainly not saying it is about to sweep aside the Labour leadership and govern FFS

It's almost not unthinkable that there could be some sort of wider left realignment into a force with some traction or even that if that does happen some Labour types could play a role in it - what is unthinkable is that the LRC will play any sort of role.
 
LRC could be one component of such a formation. I don't see much evidence of an organised Labour left outside of the LRC now - the old CLPDers and old CND types like Walter Wolfgang, a few young people around Socialist Action, but Compass has pretty much died a death and its left credentials were always flakey at best. Locally the new LRC branch is shaking some signs of life out of the CLP and at the same time working in a non-sectarian way on anti-cuts campaigns with groups like the SP and Green Left. Only substantial question we really differ on is standing alternative candidates or trying to exert some influence inside. Mind you there's some nutters in there too - a Posadist (a live one), two ex-WRPs now set up as Socialist Fight. Also a an ex-Workers Power, an ex Socialist Organiser, an ex-IMG, an ex AWL, I am ex-SP, christ I'm putting myself off the thing now :facepalm: I suppose at least there is some consolidation going on, and we have some young working class recruits who have never been in a Trot group :)
 
Can anyone recommend a good book on Gramsci's thought? Trying to get my head around it, I've got a selection from the Prison Notebooks that I'm reading but wouldn't mind some secondary reading. Preferably someone with a more - not sure what the right terms is, Marxist? materialist? - interpretation. (as opposed to the ones that focus mainly on the intersubjective side).
 
Can anyone recommend a good book on Gramsci's thought? Trying to get my head around it, I've got a selection from the Prison Notebooks that I'm reading but wouldn't mind some secondary reading. Preferably someone with a more - not sure what the right terms is, Marxist? materialist? - interpretation. (as opposed to the ones that focus mainly on the intersubjective side).
I've just picked up a book this weekend actually, I haven't started it but it sounds what you are looking for I hope, the title, Gramsci's Politics (2nd edition), Anne Showstack Sassoon, "this comprehensive survey of Gramsci's political theory, which spans the whole range of his writings, provides an ideal introduction and lucid guide to his complex and often obscure texts".
Hope this helps, good luck.
 
If you want a decent basic (and i mean basic) one that outlines the general structure Roger Simon's Gramsci's Political Thought: An Introduction will do fine, you'll be able to spot his (Simon's) euro-communist leanings a mile off - easily avoided. For something with a bit more depth and that ties in his thought with his life and political activity Antonio A. Santucci's Gramsci is worth the effort. Steve Jones did one on him in the Routledge critical thinkers series - short and to the point. In the wanky philosopher vein there is also Gramsci's Political Thought: Hegemony, Consciousness, and the Revolutionary Process by Joseph Femia. To dispel a few well worn myths i would also read the article Antonio Gramsci and the Bolshevization of the PCI by Thomas Bates.
 
By no means a begginers guide but Peter Thomas's "The Gramscian moment" is a good counterblast at eurocommunist readings.
 
I'm interested in the political relationship between Germany, Italy and Japan up to and during WWII.

We learn and watch loads on the relationship between Britain, USA and USSR but I've never seen anything on the axis relationship. I'd have thought Hitler and Hirohito would have been a good title but no.

Any recommendations?
 
Perhaps primarily one for the anarcho-types, but a really interesting read nonetheless:-

"Anarchist seeds beneath the snow"

Weary of reading about the Germans, Russians, Spanish and Italians? Want to know about some 'home-grown' left-libertarian thought? Then this is the book for you!

David Goodway examines the lives, thoughts and works of a number of British Socialists, Utopians, left-libertarians and fellow travellers including Morris, Wilde, Carpenter, Read, Huxley and Ward. Really well reasearched, passionate and surprisingly accessible for an amalgam of Goodway's life's research!

I thoroughly recommend the book, and perhaps best of all, this is a book about books that inspires you to go on and read widely from the 'tradition'. Thus far, as a result of Goodway's work, I've read Huxley's "Island", John Cowper Powys' extraordinary "Porious", (oh my word...what a book!!!), and Morris' delightful "News from Nowhere".:D
 
This thread seems a little slow atm, so I'll give it another go, shall I?

I'm presently working my way through Mark Bevir's "The Making of British Socialism" and a jolly fascinating read it is. Ian Bone was recently highlighting the 50th anniversiary of E P Thompson's "The making of..." and I'm sure that Bevir tips a wink of recogntion in his choice of title for his 2011 book. I'll also confess that i was rather taken with the cover, :rolleyes: , that includes a partly coloured, wonderful reproduction of Walter Crane's "Capitalist Vampire":-
%7B063D8F4D-737D-4D02-82DC-FCD3A211565F%7DImg100.jpg


In reading this book I suppose I wanted to explore in some depth the question in my own mind about where it all went wrong for British Socilaism? Why have we been left with a 'left' of a neo-liberal, ex social democracy party and an array of fragmented an ineffectual radical/revolutionary parties?

i suppose it's a bit premature to come to any conclusions about whether Bevir's book has helped me in this personal quest, but so far I've certainly learnt a good deal about the early Marxists, especially the SDF under Hyndman and the Fabians. Still much to read though.:)

The official blurb on the book:-
The Making of British Socialism provides a new interpretation of the emergence of British socialism in the late nineteenth century, demonstrating that it was not a working-class movement demanding state action, but a creative campaign of political hope promoting social justice, personal transformation, and radical democracy. Mark Bevir shows that British socialists responded to the dilemmas of economics and faith against a background of diverse traditions, melding new economic theories opposed to capitalism with new theologies which argued that people were bound in divine fellowship.
Bevir utilizes an impressive range of sources to illuminate a number of historical questions: Why did the British Marxists follow a Tory aristocrat who dressed in a frock coat and top hat? Did the Fabians develop a new economic theory? What was the role of Christian theology and idealist philosophy in shaping socialist ideas? He explores debates about capitalism, revolution, the simple life, sexual relations, and utopian communities. He gives detailed accounts of the Marxists, Fabians, and ethical socialists, including famous authors such as William Morris and George Bernard Shaw. And he locates these socialists among a wide cast of colorful characters, including Karl Marx, Henry Thoreau, Leo Tolstoy, and Oscar Wilde.
By showing how socialism combined established traditions and new ideas in order to respond to the changing world of the late nineteenth century, The Making of British Socialism turns aside long-held assumptions about the origins of a major movement.
 
Cheers for the Gramsci recommendations - only just seen them. butchersapron - the pdf in post 441 is set to private now so I can't view it - don't suppose you know if it's online anywhere else? Cheers.

I'm reading Christopher Cramer's Civil War is not a Stupid Thing at the moment - his thesis seems to be that civil war (though not necessarily only civil war) in developing countries is as much about the severing traditional ties of deference and mutual responsibility, primitive accumulation and class formation as anything else. So rather than it being, as liberal theorists claim, 'development in reverse' it in fact is capitalist development. He seems to be using a broadly historical materialist framework but I'm getting the impression that there are also some modernization theory influences there too - though I might be wrong on that one, not got far enough to judge.

It's a really interesting read though and it presents arguments I've not seen anywhere else - worth a look for anyone interested in Africa and especially Angola. He also talks about the influence of war on the Ethiopian famine, and since I was a kid in the 80s pretty much everything I knew about that had come from Bob Geldoff - I'd always thought it was all about droughts.
 
Back
Top Bottom