Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

The big Brexit thread - news, updates and discussion

Oh don't go down this rabbit hole. This is just the latest attempt by the hardline leave types to blame everyone and anyone apart from themselves for the shit-show they've created.
Nah i think its true. This wasn't inevitable and the 49% could definitely have prevented no deal if that had been the aim instead of marching up and down for years demanding that we don't leave at all, I reckon.
 
More to the point, if we "remainers' hadn't wasted all that time & energy trying to reverse the decision, if they had stopped calling themselves remainers but instead made some coherent concerted argument for a soft brexit / customs union or whatever i don't think we'd be here now. There's plenty of blame to go round for whatever happens next imo.
If we are remainers then who are they remainers? And if it was so easy to change things by changing names from remainer to eg feta buccaneer I think it would have been tried
 
Nah i think its true. This wasn't inevitable and the 49% could definitely have prevented no deal if that had been the aim instead of marching up and down for years demanding that we don't leave at all, I reckon.

Not sure anyone who's not an MP could do anything once the vote was taken. They seem to have decided it amongst themselves. Apart from the last election perhaps.
 
If we are remainers then who are they remainers? And if it was so easy to change things by changing names from remainer to eg feta buccaneer I think it would have been tried
I think that was me trying to say that before the referendum I was ok to go with the label remainer, afterwards it should have changed to something like customs alignment-er.
 
Nah i think its true. This wasn't inevitable and the 49% could definitely have prevented no deal if that had been the aim instead of marching up and down for years demanding that we don't leave at all, I reckon.

But people weren't just 'marching up and down demanding we don't leave at all.' 'Remain' ran the gamut from hardline revokers to those who did try and engineer a softer Brexit. But that wasn't a realistic prospect as soon as May took it off the table in 2016.

e2a - some good points on the debates in 2017-9 in Chris Grey's latest blogpost.
 
Last edited:
But people weren't just 'marching up and down demanding we don't leave at all.' 'Remain' ran the gamut from hardline revokers to those who did try and engineer a softer Brexit. But that wasn't a realistic prospect as soon as May took it off the table in 2016.
Fair enough. I didn’t notice that very much apart from david gauke and a few like that who saw years ago that no deal was very likely.
 
Millions of people marched and signed petitions from 2016 to at least the end of 2018 to say that Brexit wasn’t working and we needed a second referendum to undo it. That was definitely the face of remainerdom. Soft Brexit was a whisper in the storm.
 
Millions of people marched and signed petitions from 2016 to at least the end of 2018 to say that Brexit wasn’t working and we needed a second referendum to undo it. That was definitely the face of remainerdom. Soft Brexit was a whisper in the storm.
Without re-running thousands of pages of threads again...there was always logic behind the 'pure' binary positions of 'Leave' (meaning leaving) and 'Remain' (meaning not leaving) given the binary, single referendum put before the electorate. Cameron did not offer any halfway house.
 
Without re-running thousands of pages of threads again...there was always logic behind the 'pure' binary positions of 'Leave' (meaning leaving) and 'Remain' (meaning not leaving) given the binary, single referendum put before the electorate. Cameron did not offer any halfway house.
If that’s true then there can be no complaints now about no deal.

It’s not true, though. All the advertising and literature at the time made it clear that “leave” would most likely mean remaining in the customs union. We all even received a printed leaflet about it through our letterboxes.
 
If that’s true then there can be no complaints now about no deal.

It’s not true, though. All the advertising and literature at the time made it clear that “leave” would most likely mean remaining in the customs union. We all even received a printed leaflet about it through our letterboxes.
There are always voters who choose to believe what they're told. Despite the eventual logic of 'Leave' meaning actually leaving the supra state, I don't agree that folk can't complain at the outcome achieved by the liars. Remember that 49.5% of the population couldn't or didn't even participate in the plebiscite.
 
Millions of people marched and signed petitions from 2016 to at least the end of 2018 to say that Brexit wasn’t working and we needed a second referendum to undo it. That was definitely the face of remainerdom. Soft Brexit was a whisper in the storm.

It was, but thats because so many people poured so much effort into keeping it quiet - the ERG for obvious reasons, but on the other side the anti-Corb faction, the SNP and the LDs all found differing reasons to back a policy that was never going to come into being without changing the government.

A soft Brexit was eminently achievable, but it would have interfered with too many people's careers and so they rejected it. Later most of those people lost their careers and went to work in the usual posts.
 
We did not
That is why we voted remain

:)
There are certainly a few who seem to embrace every piece of bad news as an opportunity to say "I told you so".

And one Remainer in particular who has repeated posted about how he hopes the lights will go out in NI on the first day of the New Year, although thankfully he's a bit of an aberration...
 
But people weren't just 'marching up and down demanding we don't leave at all.' 'Remain' ran the gamut from hardline revokers to those who did try and engineer a softer Brexit. But that wasn't a realistic prospect as soon as May took it off the table in 2016.

e2a - some good points on the debates in 2017-9 in Chris Grey's latest blogpost.
That’s a good clear eyed bit of writing. It’s true the problem with hindsight is that it forgets it is just that, hindsight. Also I forgot how may sold her deal as either this, or else no deal or no brexit, giving pretty much everyone a good reason to oppose it.
 
That’s a good clear eyed bit of writing. It’s true the problem with hindsight is that it forgets it is just that, hindsight. Also I forgot how may sold her deal as either this, or else no deal or no brexit, giving pretty much everyone a good reason to oppose it.

Chris Grey's blog has been the best rolling analysis of events since 2016 IMO. I don't always agree with him - he's 'hard remain' - but as an analysis of the political machinations it's unparalleled.
 
Back
Top Bottom