Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

The Attack On Working Tax Credits: Implentation & Propaganda.

Wonder when the first BBC or Ch5 'documentary' on WTC claimants ''living the high life'' will begin.
Some are and good on 'em. Despite their flaws the extra money on them allowed my wage to feed the family, pay the bills and get us both out of the house one night a week and a few other luxuries. When your 18 with a baby that is pretty great. We were lucky that we were living in a house owned by one of her relatives who was mining abroad which kept the rent down so probably not a typical experience but a lot better than the job I had alone. For a few months over the summer my part time job was full time due to illness/holiday plus seasonal work which with travel (and the fact I couldn't afford to go home between jobs) kept me out of the house from 7am to midnight weekdays and most of the day weekends. When we finally got our claim through the seasonal work was over but we still had almost as much money coming in with me on only 20 hours and her working Saturdays. We would of struggled to get by on that for any length of time. Some weeks I had been working 70 hours + upto 3 hours travel and standing at bus stops a day and we had seemed little better off than 20, her Saturdays + tax credits.
 
I think so because it's one thing to point to the unemployed as feckless but much harder to make the same charge at low paid cleaners, guards, admin staff etc.

It's not too hard to paint them as feckless. It's already being done, albeit subtly but it's there. Look at the language in this article. To incentivise them for more work (because really they're lazy bastards who could work harder instead of sponging off you. Nevermind there's no extra jobs to go to we just won't mention that bit). I know it's child tax credits but the attack and language is the same.
 
But this is the problem. Benefit Street promoted the concept of a certain lifestyle that comes with being unemployed/never employed.

You simply can't attempt the to pull the same narrative with those in work. Peoples own experience of those in that boat won't allow it.
I think you underestimate some peoples distain for anyone they think is getting a better deal than them. Why should they get x just because they have kids,a disability etc etc. They're always getting their hair or nails done. I can't afford that. They've just bought a house, have a new car etc but why should that other person have something they don't. The real politics of envy.
 
The media's been softening us up for this for ages already

Just look at the language used in this article from 3 years ago

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ouncil-house-despite-raking-34k-benefits.html
Miss Kozlovska, a self-employed cleaner...
The implication being that she's getting it because she's foreign.

The attack on tax credits started years ago and is getting stronger.

Self-employed people will be next in line (in relation to tax credits). Staff are demoralized and there's nowhere near enough of them. Aggressive pursuit of overpayments is the priority now. Many staff left to go to the DWP with promises of higher pay but loads of them came back saying "jesus fucking christ...it's WORSE over there."

It'll just get worse.
 
But this is the problem. Benefit Street promoted the concept of a certain lifestyle that comes with being unemployed/never employed.

You simply can't attempt the to pull the same narrative with those in work. Peoples own experience of those in that boat won't allow it.

It was 2005/6 when I first got the impression that the discourse around immigrants and benefits/benefit fraud and tax credit/tax credit abuse in the media was typical "first they came for..." talk especially taking into account the big fish dodge the system out of billions. I've been vocal about this (as much as I can being one in 60 million). It's come.
 
It's not too hard to paint them as feckless. It's already being done, albeit subtly but it's there. Look at the language in this article. To incentivise them for more work (because really they're lazy bastards who could work harder instead of sponging off you. Nevermind there's no extra jobs to go to we just won't mention that bit). I know it's child tax credits but the attack and language is the same.

http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/b...snight-humilated-single-mother-shanene-thorpe

Ah, Allegra Stratton, she has form, remember Sherene Thorp on Newsnight?
 
I think you underestimate some peoples distain for anyone they think is getting a better deal than them. Why should they get x just because they have kids,a disability etc etc. They're always getting their hair or nails done. I can't afford that. They've just bought a house, have a new car etc but why should that other person have something they don't. The real politics of envy.


yes, and there appears to be a whole army of misanthropes, social darwinists, UKIP types to reinforce that message, help create moral panic

and no, I don't think they are orchestrated, just a lot of them.
 
I think you underestimate some peoples distain for anyone they think is getting a better deal than them. Why should they get x just because they have kids,a disability etc etc. They're always getting their hair or nails done. I can't afford that. They've just bought a house, have a new car etc but why should that other person have something they don't. The real politics of envy.

Agree, but to an extent.

The narrative before has been 'working families getting up early for work and walking past their feckless unemployed neighbour still in bed' 'we want to make work pay' etc.

Not only is this narrative impossible here but - crucially - a bigger constituency than you one describe will recognise those on the receiving end and see the narrative for what it is.

Attacking people who are working and grafting is a game changer for the austerity spinners.
 
yes, and there appears to be a whole army of misanthropes, social darwinists, UKIP types to reinforce that message, help create moral panic

and no, I don't think they are orchestrated, just a lot of them.

then you get the 'wasn't like that in my day' brigade, who see people having an easier time than they did 30 years ago in similar circumstances and get all shitty that people might no longer have to struggle as much as they did. it did them good - no it fucking didn't, cause it's turned them into a heartless cunt.

but also a lot of myth about what benefits are actualy available. I got told a lot of stuff i could claim for when i first claimed benefits. because why should they (the underserving multitude) get it and not me, cause they thought that somehow i was magically fundamentally different from all other claimants. :facepalm: All i had to do is ask and I'd get extra money for the kid's clothes, money to run a car, money off the bills. With no understanding that although there were schemes that could make these available, they all rely on very specific circumstances (eg motability schemes) and wern't just handed out as more cash to anyone for the asking. and no amount of explaining did anything other than get an unduly aggressive response because i wouldn't try to claim stuff that didn't exist in the way they thought it did. I got everything I could, because the JC advisor gave me all the necessary paperwork, in between muttering abut my ex being a bastard, but i still got shit off these nuggets.
 
Attacking people who are working and grafting is a game changer for the austerity spinners.

I don't think so. I grant you that it's more aggressive now but they've been at it and gradually pumping up that narrative for years.

treelover's link is a good example:

While outrage has, rightly, been focused on the fact that Thorpe was misrepresented since she is not unemployed, that is not the only problem with the interview. It perpetrates lazy assumptions about single mothers: scroungers who should hide themselves away and not ask for anything.
 
I think the writer of the article should have chosen the word "perpetuates" instead of "perpetrates" in that snipet.
 
Ducan Smith's insistence that people who "have disabilities are treated with the utmost kindness and utmost support" during the cuts seems to hint that ESA or DLA/PIP will be slashed. I've read speculation that contribution-based ESA is likely to be abolished and ESA WRAG payments cut to JSA rates.

ESA(C) is only payable for 1 year anyway after that you have to apply for ESA Income Related and thus is means tested and had to get, I did not get it as my wifes part time earnings take her just over threshold but my disabilities due to SAH/Stroke remain.

I was assessed by the then ATOS and given a 2 year award but only got ESA for a year.
 
She's nothing compared to Alley Einstein.

ally-einstein.png
 
ESA(C) is only payable for 1 year anyway after that you have to apply for ESA Income Related and thus is means tested...

That is the case for ESA claimants in the Work Related Activity Group but for those in the Support Group, there is currently no time limit for contribution-based payments.
 
That was my experience for much of the time I was on them I wanted/needed more hours. When I had a small pay rise I ended up slightly better off. I've known employers who have considered giving a pay rise but assumed the employee would get no extra benefit and would rather the money came from someone else. Is that an accurate perception? Doesn't tally with when I had the small rise but when I eventually got the extra hours I was no longer entitled due to a change of circumstances.

I recently had a 20p an hour payrise. I work 21.5 hours a week and went up from £6.70 to £6.90 an hour. I didn't tell Housing Benefit about it until I had two payslips showing the new rate because past experience has told me that if I told them about it straightaway they would suspend my HB payments until I had those two payslips to send them to prove it. So they didn't suspend my HB, but my 20p an hour payrise has resulted in a £145 overpayment which they're taking back off my HB payments at £11 per week. There's your benefit trap, right there. My payrise is pointless and actually causing me more trouble than it's worth.
 
Last edited:
Ah, right...When Universal Clusterfuck was first meant to be trialled it was to be across a number of Greater Manchester boroughs, but it was so shit in the getting together that they reduced it to just the job centre in Ashton Under Lyme (and only certain claimant types there)

This blogger (and green party candidate) has been protesting and monitoring ever since.

This entry gives some idea as to what awaits others....

https://thepoorsideoflife.wordpress...ey-amongst-other-happenings-at-the-jobcentre/
 
I'm in favour of abolishing working tax credit or whatever the fuck it's called. Employers should pay enough that it isn't needed.
But I think we need to get the employer bit sorted out before we get rid of the tax credits :)

Although it would be typical of the logic this lot employs that they'd cook up some idea whereby removing tax credits from people would allow, by some unspecified mechanism, employers to start paying a living wage...
 
Back
Top Bottom