ItWillNeverWork
Messy Crimbobs, fellow humans.
Were all white women at the rally? Or just nazi scum ones?
Where have you read the word 'all'?
Mahroh Jahangiri said:White women: your hands may not have held most torches this wknd, but you birth, feed, caress, screw, raise, and love the systems killing us
Firstly, don't tell me what to do. Secondly, perhaps your indignation would be better focused on those White women this writer was talking about, or those who actually continue to openly support this fucking shit.Don't feign confusion.
Firstly, don't tell me what to do. Secondly, perhaps your indignation would be better focused on those White women this writer was talking about, or those who actually continue to openly support this fucking shit.
Firstly, don't tell me what to do. Secondly, perhaps your indignation would be better focused on those White women this writer was talking about, or those who actually continue to openly support this fucking shit.
She seems to be talking about all white women?
Secondly, perhaps your indignation would be better focused on those White women this writer was talking about, or those who actually continue to openly support this fucking shit.
I don't think so. Nor does it seem that 'all' white women think so either given the replies she received.
Its daft, though. You'd think people would have realized how utterly self-defeating a stance it was after 2016, but here they are again.
That fucking article...
The “Unite The Right” gathering represents so much more than toxic or fragile masculinity.
Nazis = masculinity.
I don't believe that's best done by using labels. Conflating behaviour and identity is a big mistake too.
How do you talk about things without giving them names?
And how can you separate out the dysfunctional behaviour that's associated with a particular group of people without talking about the behaviour as it's associated with that group?
How would we talk about this incident at Charlottesville without using terms like white supremacist?
How do you talk about things without giving them names?
And how can you separate out the dysfunctional behaviour that's associated with a particular group of people without talking about the behaviour as it's associated with that group?
How would we talk about this incident at Charlottesville without using terms like white supremacist?
Milo tour manager Baked Alaska got maced:
Think the chap with him is telling people that “he's a VIP!” in order to procure extra milk.
How explain those of us who never got many cuddles (sob), but never became Nazis or even grew up to harbour any bigotry at all (except maybe against students and hipsters?)'Toxic masculinity' - the pop-psychology explanation of fascism. If only men got more cuddles when they were younger then there wouldn't be any nazis. Not too many cuddles though, because then it gets all a Freudian. Plus, Hitler only had one ball, etc.
How explain those of us who never got many cuddles (sob), but never became Nazis or even grew up to harbour any bigotry at all (except maybe against students and hipsters?)
I knew it was your point. I was supporting you. Psychobabble rules now. It's one of the major nails in the coffin of the liberal left.Well quite. That's sort of my point.
Christ, please tell me people on here aren't trying the "not all white women" shit.Firstly, don't tell me what to do. Secondly, perhaps your indignation would be better focused on those White women this writer was talking about, or those who actually continue to openly support this fucking shit.
Christ, please tell me people on here aren't trying the "not all white women" shit.
To be fair by 1945 he'd done the decent thing and blow his head off...