Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

The Alt-Right

IGD: Black Bloc Defends Berkeley As Trump Supporters Give Nazi Salutes - IT'S GOING DOWN

Clashes erupted in Berkeley, CA today as anarchists and antifascists fought with members of the Alt-Right, neo-Nazis, and Trump supporters. Trump supporters openly carried anti-Semitic signs, fascist symbols, and gave neo-Nazi salutes.

Police had stated the day before that they would search people coming into the park for weapons and other items that could be used for “rioting,” however it was clear that police by and large had failed to do so – much less police the area. Law enforcement also set up plastic barriers in the park that gave the Trump supporters access to a “stage” area, in effect, protecting them from counter-demonstrators and enforcing a permit, although one was never obtained, as they focused on policing antifascists.

As the day wore on, street fights continued, and spilled into downtown Berkeley. Meanwhile, much of the Left focused on symbolic marches around Trump’s tax returns, as the media played up fears of general violence while glossing over the fascist nature of the rally itself.
 
WTF happened at Berkeley? Guardian is all inverted commas around the 'self proclaimed anti fascists'.
"In confusion, anti-Trump protesters fled as supporters of the president charged after them, attacking stragglers. In one altercation, demonstrators threw a pot of beans at each other."..
It says Trump supporters outnumbers the opposition.

Twitter is full of 'we won the battle of Berkeley' from the usual suspects.
This wasn't nothing, they did leave their computers and go outside.

Screen Shot 2017-04-16 at 07.49.30.png
 
Last edited:
WTF happened at Berkeley? Guardian is all inverted commas around the 'self proclaimed anti fascists'.
"In confusion, anti-Trump protesters fled as supporters of the president charged after them, attacking stragglers. In one altercation, demonstrators threw a pot of beans at each other."..
It says Trump supporters outnumbers the opposition.

Twitter is full of 'we won the battle of Berkeley' from the usual suspects.
This wasn't nothing, they did leave their computers and go outside.

View attachment 104483

What does that even mean Is it anti-semitic?
Or taking the piss out of anti-semitic conspiracy theories?
 
odd bunch.

C9e8000XYAEDTGk.jpg:large

Is this photo from Berkeley yesterday? WTF? You quite obviously have a nazi saluting alongside black Trump voters and the unsullied known as proud boys (they are not allowed to masturbate apparently). I think it goes to show how difficult it is to label all Trump voters as one entity, and that leads to the question of whether or not the tactics of the anti-trump protestors yesterday were the correct ones to follow or not. They chose direct action and confrontation. Was this a conservative or a fascist gathering?

In one interview an anti-trump protestor described the rally as an unacceptable white supremacist gathering but the above photo doesn't bear that out. Neither do the youtubers who spoke either. It's a tad confusing.

When obvious nazi groups or KKK march and get a beating I cheer, but I'm not sure how to view this Berkeley punch up.


It also looks like after the police withdrew, the Trump supporters got the upper hand. Maybe that was the intention.
 

Yes, That article makes the motives of the counter-protest organisers much clearer although it only manages to identify about 4 neo nazis.

What is surprising is the video embedded at the bottom of the article which shows the people from the trump camp celebrating their "victory" afterwards, because you see a group containing hispanics and what look like normal trump supporters with two black men giving the lead. They see the antifa being driven off as a victory, oblivious, it would seem to the nature of their fellow rally goers.
 
Yes, That article makes the motives of the counter-protest organisers much clearer although it only manages to identify about 4 neo nazis.

What is surprising is the video embedded at the bottom of the article which shows the people from the trump camp celebrating their "victory" afterwards, because you see a group containing hispanics and what look like normal trump supporters with two black men giving the lead. They see the antifa being driven off as a victory, oblivious, it would seem to the nature of their fellow rally goers.

Why is this so strange? While I'm not saying that all of these people are fascists, they aren't, the fact that they aren't uniformly white is not evidence of anything really. Most historical fascist movements, including frankly Nazism, have not had a 'one drop' rule on race.

Bosnian Muslim SS

002.jpg


Brazilian Integralist fascists
28274f9.jpg

308826.jpg

There were prominent Italian fascist Jews, including Mussolini's mistress Margherita Sarfatti
Margherita_Sarfatti.jpg


... I know that we live in times where spectacle and representation are often where everything begins and ends, but really the fact that Trump has black supporters who are willing to participate in violence doesn't tell us much of anything other than the fact that Trumpism is not a movement which is equivalent to something like David Duke's ideology, which on race is undoubtedly more extreme than most historical fascist movements. We knew that already.
 
Well, here's the video. Maybe someone can explain the fucked up psychology behind it.

 
Maybe I'm thick? I just don't get what you're looking for? It was a mix of far right and more moderate Trump / nationalist supporters.
Just like the hardly-very-long article I posted said - even in its headline; an article which, you know, some people even Liked, something that usually indicates that those people might well have read and agreed with it.

Funny old world!
 
The video of white supremacist and former soldier Nathan Damigo punching a woman at Berkeley is getting a lot of play.


YS14Z5R.png


Daily Stormer editor Andrew Anglin has posted up a singularly vile editorial about it. It combines doxing with very graphic revenge porn and I'm certainly not going to link to it. Here are extracts from the text without the graphics.

I have told you all that WHITE SHARIA is not a meme, it is a FACT, and it is the only solution.

Nathan Damigo went to war Saturday, and he took out one of our top enemies.
She says her body is not a crime…

But Sergeant Damigo begs to differ!

Acts 17:31: Jesus will judge you after death.

Pepe 14:88: NATHAN DAMIGO WILL JUDGE YOU NOW!

She came to fight and she got what she came for!

This is called WHITE SHARIA in ACTION!

The whole thing I’ve been saying about women is demonstrated here.

(...)

So, this girl was really small, which makes it even funnier.

(...)

She is EXACTLY the archetype of woman who forced the demand for WHITE SHARIA.

Look at this.

This is what she was:

(...)

The “liberation” system turned her into this:

(...)

Every single cuckolded white knight faggot bitch talking about “muh princesses” in response to calls for WHITE SHARIA supports this transformation.

People who are against the “oppression” of women are the actual woman-haters.

When this bitch was 15, you could genuinely say “Aryan princess.” She was glowingly pretty, I’m sure very sweet, giggly, would blush if you flirted with her – she was fit for a white analog to K-Pop.
But “freedom” and the university system turned her into a hairy porno monster rioting on the street.

The degree to which you allow women freedom is the degree to which they will destroy their own lives and the lives of everyone around them and by extension all of civilization itself.

Imagine this girl’s father, who is now getting these images sent to him in mass in his email box (something I support, by the way, even while I sympathize with him).

We have to forcibly marry-off teenage girls to men who will TAKE CARE OF THEM!

We WANT women to be taken care of, as they are the thing that cooks, cleans, gives sexual pleasure and produces and raises children! The white knights don’t care about the protection of women! White knights skirt their MASCULINE responsibility by refusing their biological duty to protect women in REAL terms, which mainly involves protecting them from themselves, rather than some external threat!

People who are opposed to the policy of forced teenage marriage are cucks and feminists, who care not for the wellbeing of women, but simply for their own childlike emotions which have been stimulated by Jewish propaganda in Hollywood films about the independent minds of women.

And people can be like “OH YEAH OKAY BUT WHITE SHARIA IS TOO EXTREME THO” – in fact, the situation is now so extreme that we don’t have any choice anymore.

(...)

They are outraged that a WOMAN would get punched – even after these same people:
a) celebrated Richard Spencer getting punched in the face, said it was great, called for more of it, and
b) argue that there are no biological differences between women and men

Doesn’t compute.

But yeah, no matter what, we are going to be subject to a different standard for street action than our enemies.

Honestly, we should not be out on the streets without masks. In fact, there needs to be a uniform, so each person is indistinguishable from one another. Like the black bloc, there needs to be a uniform.

So, let’s celebrate the dawn of WHITE SHARIA, but at the same time, learn from this experience.

The system does not play by its own rules.

We will be punished for things that antifa do with impunity.

We have to be smart.

Hail Victory.

So, this girl was really small, which makes it even funnier.
(...)
The degree to which you allow women freedom is the degree to which they will destroy their own lives and the lives of everyone around them and by extension all of civilization itself.
 
Because we've come to expect apologism for rightism from him.

So, my apologism for rightism consists of agreeing with physical force tactics against obvious fascist mobilizations (nazis/kkk) but questions whether those same tactics were valid against a predominantly trump supporter gathering at this particular event. Therefore, duh, it's apologism for rightism.

The stuff at berkeley was hardly Cable street or Lewisham 77 was it. A bunch of conservatives (including black and hispanics) with what, a dozen outright nazis camoflaged amongst them and a few wierdos dressed as action man.

Of course fascists need to be opposed but fucking identify them correctly first.
 
So, my apologism for rightism consists of agreeing with physical force tactics against obvious fascist mobilizations (nazis/kkk) but questions whether those same tactics were valid against a predominantly trump supporter gathering at this particular event. Therefore, duh, it's apologism for rightism.

The stuff at berkeley was hardly Cable street or Lewisham 77 was it. A bunch of conservatives (including black and hispanics) with what, a dozen outright nazis camoflaged amongst them and a few wierdos dressed as action man.

Of course fascists need to be opposed but fucking identify them correctly first.
with every post your agenda becomes nakeder
that is your interpretation, you've moved from conservative picnic to this
how do you know there were only a dozen nazis? where did you get that?
did you see the capt america twat saying that they were coming for the liberals and will be visiting other cities to fuck them up?
they had tools and weapons, not organised enough for you?
 
So, my apologism for rightism consists of agreeing with physical force tactics against obvious fascist mobilizations (nazis/kkk) but questions whether those same tactics were valid against a predominantly trump supporter gathering at this particular event. Therefore, duh, it's apologism for rightism.

The stuff at berkeley was hardly Cable street or Lewisham 77 was it. A bunch of conservatives (including black and hispanics) with what, a dozen outright nazis camoflaged amongst them and a few wierdos dressed as action man.

Of course fascists need to be opposed but fucking identify them correctly first.

Have you actually read the article linked to in post #518 that you 'liked'? Because if you have I cannot see how you have arrived at the conclusion that I've bolded in your post.
 
Have you actually read the article linked to in post #518 that you 'liked'? Because if you have I cannot see how you have arrived at the conclusion that I've bolded in your post.
indeed. not like you have to read far into that article of anything

This is not to say that each or even the majority, of the hundreds of pro-Trump attendees sympathize with the Venn Diagram of white supremacist, alt-right, anti-Semitic and neo-Nazi groups which intersect with the president's broader support base. But as firsthand testimonies, numerous images and videos shared on social media can attest, explicitly racist groups and individuals were present in force, some having traveled from out of state to attend. Equally, the masked, black clad anti-fascist protesters did not amass in Berkeley to confront a gathering of people who just happened to vote for Trump. Their presence followed calls to action, which had named the specific far right and neo-Nazi alliances that were planning to attend, and indeed helped organize, the "Patriots Day" rally. The violence from both the far left and far right rested on a fulcrum that, while emphasized in the Trump era, far predates his presidency; anti-fascists have long met white supremacists with force in the streets.
but then if you're trying to excuse away white supremacy and looking/reading these things through a dirtied lens then you will come to a different conclusion to most...
 
So, my apologism for rightism consists of agreeing with physical force tactics against obvious fascist mobilizations (nazis/kkk) but questions whether those same tactics were valid against a predominantly trump supporter gathering at this particular event. Therefore, duh, it's apologism for rightism.

The stuff at berkeley was hardly Cable street or Lewisham 77 was it. A bunch of conservatives (including black and hispanics) with what, a dozen outright nazis camoflaged amongst them and a few wierdos dressed as action man.

Of course fascists need to be opposed but fucking identify them correctly first.

No. This was an organised preplanned event instegated by actual nazis with over a month of planning.
Not saying this means we have to take them all very seriously but they did plan this and fly from all over to get to Berkeley and make it happen. Anyone who looks at the event and comes away slagging off the Antifa is seriously lost on the dark side of the internet.
 
So, my apologism for rightism consists of agreeing with physical force tactics against obvious fascist mobilizations (nazis/kkk) but questions whether those same tactics were valid against a predominantly trump supporter gathering at this particular event. Therefore, duh, it's apologism for rightism.

We're not talking about the obvious stuff, we're talking about your support for a right-wing troll, your casual disregard for facts that reflect badly on your beliefs, and your liberal-tastic practice of promoting your own declared position - that you're actually a bit "left" - whenever your beliefs are questioned.

You need a dose of reflexivity.

The stuff at berkeley was hardly Cable street or Lewisham 77 was it. A bunch of conservatives (including black and hispanics) with what, a dozen outright nazis camoflaged amongst them and a few wierdos dressed as action man.

Of course fascists need to be opposed but fucking identify them correctly first.


And, of course, you constantly misapply the label "fascist", deploying it on a tiny contingent of the right, to mask the fact that a larger element are crypto-fascist or nakedly so.
 
A twitter thread from an account I've not come across before, so caveat emptor etc.


  1. Drove by the park prior to the rally. Cops and Fascists were joking, having a great time.
  2. As soon as antifascists arrived, police took positions on the flanks of antifa.
  3. About 30 more police came from the Berkeley Police Department behind the comrades down to the park.
  4. They surrounded the comrades and confiscated everything.
  5. They took black flags and flag poles. As well as homemade shields made to protect fellow comrades.
  6. at the same time the neonazis were walking around in tac vests, armor and as photos have shown, knives.
  7. immediately comrades began to call out the scumbag fascists.
  8. As the snowflake fascists were getting laughed at for perfectly embodying the MAGA stereotypes
  9. Skinny jeans wearing frat boys who were coincidentally calling Comrades and workers on our side, spoiled, wealthy.
  10. When most of the comrades at the line were POC from Berkeley, Oakland and surrounding areas.
  11. While these scumbags came into our community from places as far as Montana, Colorado and Southern California.
  12. Racism, Sexism, Homophobia, Transphobia, all of it was on display. Not surprising of course.
  13. Antiblack racism was a big one. Much of it leveled towards black comrades that rolled out with Antifa.
  14. Mockingly chanting blue lives matter, all lives matter and other variants of this sort.
  15. At every opportunity when the Fascists tried to engage the comrades, they were put down swiftly and with incredible ferocity.
  16. It was a joke. For all the huffing and puffing these fools do, they went down like the chumps they are. (see press pictures)
  17. The Comrades WERE outnumbered, it was clear early on. This is true.
  18. nevertheless Fascists got their faces wiped on the concrete time and time again.
  19. It took a solid six hours of continuous fighting for their hundred bussed-in anti-revolutionaries to make any gain against
  20. the 30-40 comrades who were continuously putting them down.
  21. from what i saw, the leftist comrades who were THERE went away with smiles after an afternoon of bashing the fascists.
  22. I understand the desire to mark this as a loss, but i would hardly say so. The Bay knows what's up, the bay doesn't let down it's own
  23. Everyone gave it their 100%
  24. I would kindly request Berkeley Antifa to further hash out tactics. Moving as a bloc.
  25. How to think strategically about channeling and moving crowds.
  26. There were several points where those folks with the music lead fellow comrades into strategically vulnerable positions
  27. to violence from the fascists and potentially the police.
  28. the bloc was split or stretched thin. In positions where they had very few spots to go. A good after action self crit is important here.
  29. Nevertheless to Berkeley Antifa, to those from the Bay, Sac and surrounding areas MUCH love and respect.
  30. Bash The Fash.
 
Last edited:
On the general political climate on the street, vis a vis far right stuff against left wing people, there's this interesting report by Alex Rubinstein about a recent anti-war protest in Jacksonville, Florida, which suggests informal (if one is being particularly charitable) collusion between many of these alt-right knuckleheads and local law enforcement

Anatomy of an anti-war “riot” – Alex Rubinstein – Medium
 
The video of white supremacist and former soldier Nathan Damigo punching a woman at Berkeley is getting a lot of play.


YS14Z5R.png


Daily Stormer editor Andrew Anglin has posted up a singularly vile editorial about it. It combines doxing with very graphic revenge porn and I'm certainly not going to link to it. Here are extracts from the text without the graphics.

I have told you all that WHITE SHARIA is not a meme, it is a FACT, and it is the only solution.

Nathan Damigo went to war Saturday, and he took out one of our top enemies.
She says her body is not a crime…

But Sergeant Damigo begs to differ!

Acts 17:31: Jesus will judge you after death.

Pepe 14:88: NATHAN DAMIGO WILL JUDGE YOU NOW!

She came to fight and she got what she came for!

This is called WHITE SHARIA in ACTION!

The whole thing I’ve been saying about women is demonstrated here.

(...)

So, this girl was really small, which makes it even funnier.

(...)

She is EXACTLY the archetype of woman who forced the demand for WHITE SHARIA.

Look at this.

This is what she was:

(...)

The “liberation” system turned her into this:

(...)

Every single cuckolded white knight faggot bitch talking about “muh princesses” in response to calls for WHITE SHARIA supports this transformation.

People who are against the “oppression” of women are the actual woman-haters.

When this bitch was 15, you could genuinely say “Aryan princess.” She was glowingly pretty, I’m sure very sweet, giggly, would blush if you flirted with her – she was fit for a white analog to K-Pop.
But “freedom” and the university system turned her into a hairy porno monster rioting on the street.

The degree to which you allow women freedom is the degree to which they will destroy their own lives and the lives of everyone around them and by extension all of civilization itself.

Imagine this girl’s father, who is now getting these images sent to him in mass in his email box (something I support, by the way, even while I sympathize with him).

We have to forcibly marry-off teenage girls to men who will TAKE CARE OF THEM!

We WANT women to be taken care of, as they are the thing that cooks, cleans, gives sexual pleasure and produces and raises children! The white knights don’t care about the protection of women! White knights skirt their MASCULINE responsibility by refusing their biological duty to protect women in REAL terms, which mainly involves protecting them from themselves, rather than some external threat!

People who are opposed to the policy of forced teenage marriage are cucks and feminists, who care not for the wellbeing of women, but simply for their own childlike emotions which have been stimulated by Jewish propaganda in Hollywood films about the independent minds of women.

And people can be like “OH YEAH OKAY BUT WHITE SHARIA IS TOO EXTREME THO” – in fact, the situation is now so extreme that we don’t have any choice anymore.

(...)

They are outraged that a WOMAN would get punched – even after these same people:
a) celebrated Richard Spencer getting punched in the face, said it was great, called for more of it, and
b) argue that there are no biological differences between women and men

Doesn’t compute.

But yeah, no matter what, we are going to be subject to a different standard for street action than our enemies.

Honestly, we should not be out on the streets without masks. In fact, there needs to be a uniform, so each person is indistinguishable from one another. Like the black bloc, there needs to be a uniform.

So, let’s celebrate the dawn of WHITE SHARIA, but at the same time, learn from this experience.

The system does not play by its own rules.

We will be punished for things that antifa do with impunity.

We have to be smart.

Hail Victory.


(...)

Reading this stuff is a real insight into the sort of mentality that leads to the rape and torture camps run by Pinochet and Assad.
 
Back
Top Bottom