butchersapron
Bring back hanging
Damn these powerful tiny sites pulling strings.
The alt-right are angry at the US airstrikes against Assad. But they don't blame Trump, I suspect you can guess who they do blame...
Clashes erupted in Berkeley, CA today as anarchists and antifascists fought with members of the Alt-Right, neo-Nazis, and Trump supporters. Trump supporters openly carried anti-Semitic signs, fascist symbols, and gave neo-Nazi salutes.
Police had stated the day before that they would search people coming into the park for weapons and other items that could be used for “rioting,” however it was clear that police by and large had failed to do so – much less police the area. Law enforcement also set up plastic barriers in the park that gave the Trump supporters access to a “stage” area, in effect, protecting them from counter-demonstrators and enforcing a permit, although one was never obtained, as they focused on policing antifascists.
As the day wore on, street fights continued, and spilled into downtown Berkeley. Meanwhile, much of the Left focused on symbolic marches around Trump’s tax returns, as the media played up fears of general violence while glossing over the fascist nature of the rally itself.
WTF happened at Berkeley? Guardian is all inverted commas around the 'self proclaimed anti fascists'.
"In confusion, anti-Trump protesters fled as supporters of the president charged after them, attacking stragglers. In one altercation, demonstrators threw a pot of beans at each other."..
It says Trump supporters outnumbers the opposition.
Twitter is full of 'we won the battle of Berkeley' from the usual suspects.
This wasn't nothing, they did leave their computers and go outside.
View attachment 104483
odd bunch.
Yes, That article makes the motives of the counter-protest organisers much clearer although it only manages to identify about 4 neo nazis.
What is surprising is the video embedded at the bottom of the article which shows the people from the trump camp celebrating their "victory" afterwards, because you see a group containing hispanics and what look like normal trump supporters with two black men giving the lead. They see the antifa being driven off as a victory, oblivious, it would seem to the nature of their fellow rally goers.
Maybe I'm thick? I just don't get what you're looking for? It was a mix of far right and more moderate Trump / nationalist supporters.Well, here's the video. Maybe someone can explain the fucked up psychology behind it.
Just like the hardly-very-long article I posted said - even in its headline; an article which, you know, some people even Liked, something that usually indicates that those people might well have read and agreed with it.Maybe I'm thick? I just don't get what you're looking for? It was a mix of far right and more moderate Trump / nationalist supporters.
Really good helpful article that.
(...)So, this girl was really small, which makes it even funnier.
The degree to which you allow women freedom is the degree to which they will destroy their own lives and the lives of everyone around them and by extension all of civilization itself.
How is this take not a surprise to me?
Because we've come to expect apologism for rightism from him.
with every post your agenda becomes nakederSo, my apologism for rightism consists of agreeing with physical force tactics against obvious fascist mobilizations (nazis/kkk) but questions whether those same tactics were valid against a predominantly trump supporter gathering at this particular event. Therefore, duh, it's apologism for rightism.
The stuff at berkeley was hardly Cable street or Lewisham 77 was it. A bunch of conservatives (including black and hispanics) with what, a dozen outright nazis camoflaged amongst them and a few wierdos dressed as action man.
Of course fascists need to be opposed but fucking identify them correctly first.
So, my apologism for rightism consists of agreeing with physical force tactics against obvious fascist mobilizations (nazis/kkk) but questions whether those same tactics were valid against a predominantly trump supporter gathering at this particular event. Therefore, duh, it's apologism for rightism.
The stuff at berkeley was hardly Cable street or Lewisham 77 was it. A bunch of conservatives (including black and hispanics) with what, a dozen outright nazis camoflaged amongst them and a few wierdos dressed as action man.
Of course fascists need to be opposed but fucking identify them correctly first.
indeed. not like you have to read far into that article of anythingHave you actually read the article linked to in post #518 that you 'liked'? Because if you have I cannot see how you have arrived at the conclusion that I've bolded in your post.
but then if you're trying to excuse away white supremacy and looking/reading these things through a dirtied lens then you will come to a different conclusion to most...This is not to say that each or even the majority, of the hundreds of pro-Trump attendees sympathize with the Venn Diagram of white supremacist, alt-right, anti-Semitic and neo-Nazi groups which intersect with the president's broader support base. But as firsthand testimonies, numerous images and videos shared on social media can attest, explicitly racist groups and individuals were present in force, some having traveled from out of state to attend. Equally, the masked, black clad anti-fascist protesters did not amass in Berkeley to confront a gathering of people who just happened to vote for Trump. Their presence followed calls to action, which had named the specific far right and neo-Nazi alliances that were planning to attend, and indeed helped organize, the "Patriots Day" rally. The violence from both the far left and far right rested on a fulcrum that, while emphasized in the Trump era, far predates his presidency; anti-fascists have long met white supremacists with force in the streets.
So, my apologism for rightism consists of agreeing with physical force tactics against obvious fascist mobilizations (nazis/kkk) but questions whether those same tactics were valid against a predominantly trump supporter gathering at this particular event. Therefore, duh, it's apologism for rightism.
The stuff at berkeley was hardly Cable street or Lewisham 77 was it. A bunch of conservatives (including black and hispanics) with what, a dozen outright nazis camoflaged amongst them and a few wierdos dressed as action man.
Of course fascists need to be opposed but fucking identify them correctly first.
So, my apologism for rightism consists of agreeing with physical force tactics against obvious fascist mobilizations (nazis/kkk) but questions whether those same tactics were valid against a predominantly trump supporter gathering at this particular event. Therefore, duh, it's apologism for rightism.
The stuff at berkeley was hardly Cable street or Lewisham 77 was it. A bunch of conservatives (including black and hispanics) with what, a dozen outright nazis camoflaged amongst them and a few wierdos dressed as action man.
Of course fascists need to be opposed but fucking identify them correctly first.
The video of white supremacist and former soldier Nathan Damigo punching a woman at Berkeley is getting a lot of play.
Daily Stormer editor Andrew Anglin has posted up a singularly vile editorial about it. It combines doxing with very graphic revenge porn and I'm certainly not going to link to it. Here are extracts from the text without the graphics.
I have told you all that WHITE SHARIA is not a meme, it is a FACT, and it is the only solution.
Nathan Damigo went to war Saturday, and he took out one of our top enemies.
She says her body is not a crime…
But Sergeant Damigo begs to differ!
Acts 17:31: Jesus will judge you after death.
Pepe 14:88: NATHAN DAMIGO WILL JUDGE YOU NOW!
She came to fight and she got what she came for!
This is called WHITE SHARIA in ACTION!
The whole thing I’ve been saying about women is demonstrated here.
(...)
So, this girl was really small, which makes it even funnier.
(...)
She is EXACTLY the archetype of woman who forced the demand for WHITE SHARIA.
Look at this.
This is what she was:
(...)
The “liberation” system turned her into this:
(...)
Every single cuckolded white knight faggot bitch talking about “muh princesses” in response to calls for WHITE SHARIA supports this transformation.
People who are against the “oppression” of women are the actual woman-haters.
When this bitch was 15, you could genuinely say “Aryan princess.” She was glowingly pretty, I’m sure very sweet, giggly, would blush if you flirted with her – she was fit for a white analog to K-Pop.
But “freedom” and the university system turned her into a hairy porno monster rioting on the street.
The degree to which you allow women freedom is the degree to which they will destroy their own lives and the lives of everyone around them and by extension all of civilization itself.
Imagine this girl’s father, who is now getting these images sent to him in mass in his email box (something I support, by the way, even while I sympathize with him).
We have to forcibly marry-off teenage girls to men who will TAKE CARE OF THEM!
We WANT women to be taken care of, as they are the thing that cooks, cleans, gives sexual pleasure and produces and raises children! The white knights don’t care about the protection of women! White knights skirt their MASCULINE responsibility by refusing their biological duty to protect women in REAL terms, which mainly involves protecting them from themselves, rather than some external threat!
People who are opposed to the policy of forced teenage marriage are cucks and feminists, who care not for the wellbeing of women, but simply for their own childlike emotions which have been stimulated by Jewish propaganda in Hollywood films about the independent minds of women.
And people can be like “OH YEAH OKAY BUT WHITE SHARIA IS TOO EXTREME THO” – in fact, the situation is now so extreme that we don’t have any choice anymore.
(...)
They are outraged that a WOMAN would get punched – even after these same people:
a) celebrated Richard Spencer getting punched in the face, said it was great, called for more of it, and
b) argue that there are no biological differences between women and men
Doesn’t compute.
But yeah, no matter what, we are going to be subject to a different standard for street action than our enemies.
Honestly, we should not be out on the streets without masks. In fact, there needs to be a uniform, so each person is indistinguishable from one another. Like the black bloc, there needs to be a uniform.
So, let’s celebrate the dawn of WHITE SHARIA, but at the same time, learn from this experience.
The system does not play by its own rules.
We will be punished for things that antifa do with impunity.
We have to be smart.
Hail Victory.
(...)