The 7/7 Report
- Thread starter TAE
- Start date
editor
hiraethified
And, of course, Jazzz and a host of deluded loons were quick to declare the child killing Ian Huntley as being completely innocent and a cruel victim of some bonkers, fact-free, 9/11 related cover-up or another.Andy the Don said:
Oh hang on. That all sounds a bit familiar, doesn't it?
Mr Hussain was also disgracefully & unexpectedly confronted by a grieving relative, a BBC researcher & TV crew. That's OK is it? That's justified?Badger Kitten said:Mr Hussain has been contacted by conspiracy theorists
"Your son murdered my wife?".
An anguished Mr Hussain replies: "No-one has shown me any evidence that he did it."
Should we not trust Mr Hussain? He has said he has seen no evidence. One year on, this is disgraceful.
You believe that this is because he has had phone-calls (apparantly) from people who also have not seen the evidence?
I can bearly type this without wanting to weep for him. How cruel to try and force someone to go against their own heart and believe something they have seen no evidence for and then accuse them of denial. Denial as a stage of grief is the denial that the person is dead, not denial that they are guilty.
Oh the banning games again. It hasn't happened yet, I wonder why not?editor said:I think she's doing an admirable job of proving why these lying fruitloops and their dodgy 'truth seeking' campaigns should never be trusted, so who am I to stop her one-woman self-discrediting campaign?
KeyboardJockey
Clowns to the Left of me
Fuck me are the conspiraloons still wibbling away. Maybe someone should create a radio soap about them it would run and run.
Episode 5984 and Mr Conspiraloon is still convinced that he can see pods on the 911 planes.
I wish they would fuck right off..
Episode 5984 and Mr Conspiraloon is still convinced that he can see pods on the 911 planes.
I wish they would fuck right off..
And I get called a hypocrite! Show some manners? What to someone who obviously has none?editor said:
False hope? That he should ever see the evidence? I think not.
I would also counsel against believing everything you read, you are obviously very selective about what you think requires verification and what does not.
Keep an open mind and always ask questions. especially of the media.
editor
hiraethified
As far as you're concerned, that's a definite.Prole said:
I do. Trouble is you won't answer them.Prole said:
Here's two you've refused to answer:
Is it OK for deluded, evidence-unhindered cunts to ring up the father of a 7/7 bomber with conspiracy-tastic fairy stories that give him false hope, YES/NO?
And what's the name of the "independent researchers" who "verified" those emails please?
Look. I'm asking questions, just like you suggested!
Are you going to answer them or are you going to carry on showing everyone what a weaselling hypocrite you are?
jæd said:
Haven't even started reading the last two pages but can't let this go. If you knew anything about journalism you'd know that at least 70%-80% (squeegee poll carried out over 8 years in journalism) is just parroting what the big cheeses say. As in real life really. All about maintaining a reputation and not rocking the boat. If everyone rocked the boat....why .... why there'd be anarchy chunter middle-england's finest.
How terribly naive
Prole said:
Well she's got a point. You're not exactly tolerant and accomodating now are you? Incidentally I'm going off to see the launch of an album where fun-da-mental uk apache and mecca 2 medina are playing in memory of the 7/7 victims and launching an album of street music. Wouldn't it be better to hear what Londoners of all cultures are singing and shouting about with regards to 7/7 and the blair government, instead of thinking things in terms of us and them?
No one has the right to tell anyone what they should think. Everyone in this city and in the world are doing what they think is right and speaking out. That's to be celebrated not castigated.
And I'm not gonna say what night and where because there are rules against it. But anyway, that's where I'm going. In real time
editor said:What the fuck does that soundbite bollocks mean?
Hi laydees: I'm here to get to know you... in real time, baby
I like it. I mean Mr Editor, I'm curious to know whether you'd be such a rude git if I met you in person.
Do you live like you write? Cos I don't know many people like you in real time. Most people I meet are really decent people speaking the direct truth. From all cultures. How can you live in London and not hear what people are saying on the streets and roads and tubes and buses and late night taxis. How can you be missing the suspicion that our government lied to us for nefarious ends. And if you know that, how can you believe another word they say?
I reckon you should get out more. I'm sure your palace is very cosy but there are a lot of people out there who think things very different to you and you are just gonna have to accept they will always be there.
Similar threads
- Locked
