Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

The 7/7 Report

dennisr said:
There is a real 'conspiracy' of lies and deceit and it is not some 'secret' organisation with funny handshakes and/or telopathic powers. It is not some organised group or cell with a hidden agenda but the percived economic/social interests and 'necessities' of those who have real power in this society.

So you have a conspiracy theory of your own. :rolleyes:

I believe there is a constant push for global government. I believe the same interests behind the global banking system lie behind this movement. I believe the left right system is a distraction from core issues of basic liberty.
An interrelated upper class of families is running the world, not through telepathic powers or alien intervention but through the system of economics and media they erected.

I believe the monarchists never went away.

dennisr said:
They end up deflecting and putting off others attempts to really understand the reasons these events really happened. They are letting the the real conspirators off the hook. They are taring those who are actually asking the REALLY awkward questions with the same brush.

Yes thats exactly what people who shout conspiraloon at anyone daring to question the media barrage do
I`m glad you`ve seen the light. :)
 
Bob_the_lost said:
It's pointless conjecture, since it's bollocks.

Radios. Underground. Encrypted radios. KISS.

There is nothing suspicious about the excersise, the nature, the timing or the type of threat, nor is there anything suspicious about the results from it (pretty much none). Your paranoid meanderings about it are rather irrelevant.

No there is nothing suspicious about the fact that in every major terror event during this "war on terror", there happens to be a drill occurring the same morning simulating attacks at exactly the same places.

I can find the percentage chance if you`d like.

If you do some reading on false flag terrorism you`ll probably start to change your mind, not in regard to the drills on 7/7 but in regards to how easy it has proven in the past to seriously mislead public opinion using the same tested routines. :)
 
Prole said:
...at half past nine this morning we were actually running an exercise for a company of over a thousand people in London based on simultaneous bombs going off precisely at the railway stations where it happened this morning, so I still have the hairs on the back of my neck standing upright!"

....as spoken by Mr Peter Power, Managing Director of Disaster and Crisis Management firm, Visor Consultants, interviewed by Radio 5 Live's Drivetime programme on the afternoon of July 7th 2005.
FFS: why are you so fucking stupid?

Haven't you researched this topic at all or is the one ten-month old quote backed up by zero subsequent investigation as good as your 'truth seeking' gets?
 
Azrael23 said:
I said the drill might have been a smokescreen under which to place the real bombs, like the drills on 9/11 enabled standard procedure to be recanted.
No, what you actually said, was:
Azrael23 said:
The drills are correct. The drill did happen, it always seems to happen!
Its to provide a plausible excuse for suspicious radio chatter, confusion in key depts, movement of operatives (its ok they`re part of the drill)...
Now answer these questions please:

What's this 'radio chatter' you're babbling on about (the exercise was on paper)?
What were the names of these 'key departments' involved in this 'drill and who did they work for?'
What and who were these 'key operatives' who were moving about?

Oh, and how did this exercise taking place on paper in a corporate office provide a 'smokescreen' for invisible operatives to invisibly install these invisible bombs on tube trains?
 
Lock&Light said:
There is only one way to stop it. Say No!
Well I'm not so sure which is the drivel and which isn't.

I think the only safe thing one can say about drivel on urban75 is that if you removed it all, there would hardly be any boards left.
 
Jazzz said:
Well I'm not so sure which is the drivel and which isn't.

I think the only safe thing one can say about drivel on urban75 is that if you removed it all, there would hardly be any boards left ;)
:)

I thought this was the thread about the 7/7 report which is what I have been trying to discuss. I did say I'd ignore all the abuse and pop back when it was published.

It's just tough trying to discuss anything with people who put you in a conspiraloon box, and with an editor who sets the tone which unfortunately is really unpleasant. He's not unlike one of those teachers you hated at school who has his favourite pets (generally those that he agrees with).
 
Azrael23 said:
I believe the same interests behind the global banking system lie behind this movement. I believe the left right system is a distraction from core issues of basic liberty.
An interrelated upper class of families is running the world, not through telepathic powers or alien intervention but through the system of economics and media they :)

Hmmm that sort of shit could have come straight out of the pages of Der Sturmer :mad: :rolleyes:

panel_03a.jpg
 
Prole said:
He's not unlike one of those teachers you hated at school who has his favourite pets (generally those that he agrees with).
So why do you think that barely a soul believes your take on 7.7?

Is it because:

(a) the beastly editor has dared question your selectively-compiled, research-lite claims and thus stopped 'the truth' coming out?

...or....

(b) because the vast majority here have read your wafflings and decided that you're another utterly obsessed conspiraloon who wouldn't know the truth if it came in a haddock-shaped package and slapped you about the face repeatedly?

I mean, many of us live in London, there's above average political awareness amongst most of the posters, some of us were even directly or indirectly involved in the horrors of 7/7, yet why do you think so few are giving your yarns the time of day?

Is it because - unlike you - we're all too stupid to see 'the truth' or is it because we're just gullible idiots who simply swallow anything the government tells us?

Why is it do you think that you've got barely any support here?
 
editor said:
What's wrong with first hand eye witness testimony?
What are you reasons for doubting his word?
What alternative hard evidence have you to suggest that he's lying?

Anything? Anything at all?

Witnesses are notoriously poor Editor, that is a well known fact, 10 people seeing the same event will give wildly different accounts of what happened.

The reasons for doubting his word is perhaps because he was involved in a massive traumatic event and while he may believe totally what he says, that doesn't particularly mean that his version of what happened is accurate. If he was told this guy set off a bomb, perhaps his mind is filling in gaps, perhaps he looked at this guy and then a bomb went off, and his mind fills in the gaps that make it seem to him that this guy set off the bomb.

I am not defending the case that Prole is making as it isn't something I have looked at at any great length, but the points you are making above are extremely weak and well known to be extremely weak.

If there is CCTV camera footage, as I expect there is given the propensity for CCTV cameras in this country then perhaps some of it, that which wouldn't offend the victims or their families, should be made available.
 
Fong said:
I am not defending the case that Prole is making as it isn't something I have looked at at any great length, but the points you are making above are extremely weak and well known to be extremely weak..
Not half as 'weak' as fact-free bullshit about paper exercises providing 'smokescreens' for invisible bombs to be installed on tube trains.

While I'd agree remembering faces can be unreliable, the guy says he saw the bloke with the bag seconds before the bomb went off - and the fact that he lost his legs meant that there's no denying that he was very close to the bomb.

Either way, I've yet to see a single shred of credible evidence that supports any of the alternative <cough> 'theories' about the bombing being endlessly bandied about by conspiraloons.

But who knows - perhaps Azrael will finally answer my questions soon!
 
editor said:
So why do you think that barely a soul believes your take on 7.7?
I don't know what my 'take' is exactly.

I would just expect something a bit better to come out of what we are told is a narrative based on police, intelligence and security agency reports than these men left Luton at 7.40 and reached KX at 8.23.

They can't have, no train left Luton at that time.

Just as the truth is owed to the people of Iraq for their pain and suffering, so truth and justice is owed to the survivors, the injured and families of the dead, the Muslim community and each and everyone one of us. Unless of course we are all so subservient now we'll swallow anything we're told.

Release the evidence! Show the images from Kings X from 7th July. Simple.
 
Prole said:
Show the images from Kings X from 7th July. Simple.
Bullshit. The second you see them you'll start whining on about how they've been doctored.

Prole said:
They can't have, no train left Luton at that time.
Really? So how did the bombers get to London please?
 
editor said:
Bullshit. The second you see them you'll start whining on about how they've been doctored.
I think the images we have been shown of 3 of these young men visiting London on 28/6 appear to be valid and I've never questioned them. It is disgraceful that news channels are using them to overlay their stories about 7th July with the time straps removed as if to imply they are from the day. It does prove that they must have more than the one image of the 4 entering Luton on 7th July.

Really? So how did the bombers get to London please?
That's what i'd like to know.
 
Spending a moment trying to discover what the primary source was for the statment that the 7:40 train was cancelled, I disover:

  • That very few of the conspiraloons' sites bother to indicate the source of anything;
  • This enteraining instance of conspiraloons slagging each other off for having, er, the wrong conspiracy: wagnews.blogspot.com/2005/08/giving-conspiracy-theory-bad-name.html (do not link - copy and paste)
    We need more of this (but not on these boards, obviously.
 
editor said:
Seeing as you're the one insisting that they didn't travel by train, how do you think they got to London?
More importantly why are we being told they travelled on a train that was cancelled?

Ask the important questions.
 
Prole said:
julyseventh.co.uk/july-7-luton-kings-cross-train-times.html#underground

You actually don't know what the phrase primary source means, do you, you numpty?

BTW, I found a conspiraloon site reporting an email from Thameslink saying there was a train that left at 07:42. So you must accept this this is true, because it is asserted by someone "on your side".
 
Prole said:
More importantly why are we being told they travelled on a train that was cancelled?
Could you just answer my question without further politician-style wriggling, please?
 
laptop said:
You actually don't know what the phrase primary source means, do you, you numpty?

BTW, I found a conspiraloon site reporting an email from Thameslink saying there was a train that left at 07:42. So you must accept this this is true, because it is asserted by someone "on your side".
That train (the 7.30) is on the table I posted you, it arrived at KX at 8.39, too late for these men to cacth the underground trains. The official report says they arrived at 8.23.
 
editor said:
Could you just answer my question without further politician-style wriggling, please?
The question being: How did they get to London then? As I said the official story makes no sense, maybe you should ask the Home Office or the MPS?
 
Back
Top Bottom