The 7/7 Report

[Prole]

So stop repeating slogans and bollocks and wait to see if anyone wants to discuss it with you.

No problem!

Although I quite like:

Release the evidence!
For truth and justice!

Catchy ain't it.

 

[Lock&Light]

So stop repeating slogans and bollocks and wait to see if anyone wants to discuss it with you.

I don't see much point in discussing it with Prole. His mind seems pretty well made up, don't you think?

 

[Prole]

I don't see much point in discussing it with Prole. His mind seems pretty well made up, don't you think?

Her btw

 

[nino_savatte]

Well? I thought we might discuss this.

It's easy to join up the dots - isn't it? Conspiracy theories are for those who lack critical faculties and like events to be part of some great overarching worldwide conspiracy that stops short of the nonsense put forward in the Protocols of the Elders of Zion.

 

[FridgeMagnet]

I don't see much point in discussing it with Prole. His mind seems pretty well made up, don't you think?

That may indeed be a conclusion that some people have reached, and, if so, I would encourage them not to waste their time engaging in such "discussion".

 

[Prole]

It's easy to join up the dots - isn't it? Conspiracy theories are for those who lack critical faculties and like events to be part of some great overarching worldwide conspiracy that stops short of the nonsense put forward in the Protocols of the Elders of Zion.

Not me though. I just look at the evidence which is presented. I think the MSM that deceitfully shows the CCTV images from 28/6 as if they are from 7th July use the join the dots technique.
So perhaps instead of trying to imply I believe nonsense just answer this:
Why don't they release the CCTV images from Kings X from July 7th?
And remember only the truth stands up to rigorous investigation.

 

[nino_savatte]

Not me though. I just look at the evidence which is presented. I think the MSM that deceitfully shows the CCTV images from 28/6 as if they are from 7th July use the join the dots technique.
So perhaps instead of trying to imply I believe nonsense just answer this:
Why don't they release the CCTV images from Kings X from July 7th?
And remember only the truth stands up to rigorous investigation.

Whatever the case, people died and those who carried out the bombings died too. That is a fact.

 

[Prole]

That may indeed be a conclusion that some people have reached, and, if so, I would encourage them not to waste their time engaging in such "discussion".

Whatever happened to the principle of innocent until proven guilty?

One CCTV image from Luton (badly photoshopped btw) catching a train that didn't run? (narrative can't explain how Tanweer's trousers change from light to dark between the service station and Luton)

Is that all the evidence you guys need?

Talk about joining the dots!

And you have the nerve to call me a conspiracy theorist!

 

[KeyboardJockey]

Is 7th July our Reichstag fire?



Release the evidence!

I don't often get out of my pram but why oh why has yet another terrorist thread fucked up by being full of conspiraloons with theirr fact lite drivel.

What next vaccines caused the terrorists

I shure these conspiraloons work for Thames House - professional disruptors IMO.

 

[Prole]

Whatever the case, people died and those who carried out the bombings died too. That is a fact.

A fact that deserves truth and justice.

 

[nino_savatte]

A fact that deserves truth and justice.

You're not making any sense. So you know for a fact that these CCTV images that you allude to would do what, precisely? Shed new light on....? Come on, let's hear it as I'm dying for a laugh.

 

[nino_savatte]

I don't often get out of my pram but why oh why has yet another terrorist thread fucked up by being full of conspiraloons with theirr fact lite drivel.

What next vaccines caused the terrorists

I shure these conspiraloons work for Thames House - professional disruptors IMO.

I reckon you're right KBJ (even though it sounds suspiciously like a conspiracy theory ). It's a means of demonising and dismissing critics of the regime and their war.

 

[editor]

One CCTV image from Luton (badly photoshopped btw) catching a train that didn't run? (narrative can't explain how Tanweer's trousers change from light to dark between the service station and Luton)

So what do you reckon happened then? Did he have magic trousers? Was he replaced by an exploding clone? Or might it just be that (a) he changed his trousers or (b) it's a photo exposure glitch?

What's your theory about what happened and the relevance of this change in shade (in fucking trousers, FFS!)?

And could I see your hard evidence that the CCTV image has been supposedly been Photoshopped please?

 

[FridgeMagnet]

Whatever happened to the principle of innocent until proven guilty?

One CCTV image from Luton (badly photoshopped btw) catching a train that didn't run? (narrative can't explain how Tanweer's trousers change from light to dark between the service station and Luton)

Is that all the evidence you guys need?

Talk about joining the dots!

And you have the nerve to call me a conspiracy theorist!

Sorry, is this you repeating stuff over and over again?

If someone (in this case me) is not interested in discussing something with you because you never actually discuss anything, get over it.

 

[Prole]

So what do you reckon happened then? Did he have magic trousers? Was he replaced by an exploding clone? Or might it just be that (a) he changed his trousers or (b) it's a photo exposure glitch?

What's your theory about what happened and the relevance of this change in shade (in fucking trousers, FFS!)?

And could I see your hard evidence that the CCTV image has been supposedly been Photoshopped please?

You seem content with one image from Luton (check yesterdays evening standard to see the bars going through khan's head!) going to catch a train that didn't run as judge and jury to convict these guys?
A mix of 28/6 and 7th July:

Lindsay carries a white carrier bag in both images. Tanweer's clothes are just reversed (might explain the change in colour)

 

[editor]

You seem content with one image from Luton (check yesterdays evening standard to see the bars going through khan's head!) going to catch a train that didn't run as judge and jury to convict these guys?
A mix of 28/6 and 7th July:

Lindsay carries a white carrier bag in both images. Tanweer's clothes are just reversed (might explain the change in colour)

I'd say that an eye witness who saw the guy set off the bomb right in front of him is as good as evidence gets, but I've no idea what I'm supposed to be seeing in that FAQ-busting animation.

What's the conspiracy-proving relevance of these trousers?

And where's the 'proof' of this nefarious Photoshoppery by the authorities?

(you are aware, of course, that newspapers routinely 'clean up' images prior to publication, yes?)

 

[Prole]

I'd say that an eye witness who saw the guy set off the bomb right in front of him is as good as evidence gets, but I've no idea what I'm supposed to be seeing in that FAQ-busting animation.

What's the conspiracy-proving relevance of these trousers?

And where's the 'proof' of this nefarious Photoshoppery by the authorities?

(you are aware, of course, that newspapers routinely 'clean up' images prior to publication, yes?)

I agree that one image at Luton is not good enough so let's demand that they:
Release the evidence!

 

[TAE]

I'd say that an eye witness who saw the guy set off the bomb right in front of him is as good as evidence gets [...]

Actaully when I was on jury service last year the judge told us not to put too much emphasis on eye witnesses. It's not a question of honesty, it's a question of how our brain works.

As for the CCTV - if this were a cover-up, I would have expected them to make such evidence very consistent. Ironically, the fact that the CCTV footage which they did release is bizar (and there are some weird things like the bar crossing the person) makes me think it is less likely that it was purposely doctored.

 

[KeyboardJockey]

I'd say that an eye witness who saw the guy set off the bomb right in front of him is as good as evidence gets, but I've no idea what I'm supposed to be seeing in that FAQ-busting animation.

What's the conspiracy-proving relevance of these trousers?

And where's the 'proof' of this nefarious Photoshoppery by the authorities?

(you are aware, of course, that newspapers routinely 'clean up' images prior to publication, yes?)

Don't ask for proof from a conspiraloon it only upsets them. They'll only say you are mentally blind becuase of the mind control vaccines.

Although I don't trust the govt I trust the conspiraloons even less. Especially the Icke-ites who are just one stop away from the sort of stuff you see in the protocols of the elders of zion.

 

[nino_savatte]

Don't ask for proof from a conspiraloon it only upsets them. They'll only say you are mentally blind becuase of the mind control vaccines.

Although I don't trust the govt I trust the conspiraloons even less. Especially the Icke-ites who are just one stop away from the sort of stuff you see in the protocols of the elders of zion.

Absolutely! Icke-ites and the rest of them (Rense-ites and Jones-ites etc) all regurgitate the crap found in the Protocols but they like to couch it in neutral-sounding language.

Another flying pig for you, sir?

 

[Jazzz]

I'd say that an eye witness who saw the guy set off the bomb right in front of him is as good as evidence gets.

How do you explain Mark Whitby?

 

[Prole]

Don't ask for proof from a conspiraloon it only upsets them. They'll only say you are mentally blind becuase of the mind control vaccines.

Although I don't trust the govt I trust the conspiraloons even less. Especially the Icke-ites who are just one stop away from the sort of stuff you see in the protocols of the elders of zion.

I totally agree with you about lizards and protocols, I believe these people do those that try to question 'what we are told to believe' a great disservice perhaps they do it on purpose.

I'm just an ordinary person who has tried to investigate the evidence that is in the public domain about the events of 7th July. I can't offer proof that 'something else happened' all I can do is examine the 'proof' of what we have been told happened. Only the truth stands up to rigorous investigation.

 

[Prole]

Perhaps more people should have questioned the events surrounding the Reichstag fire and history would have turned out differently.

How does it repeat itself? is it tragedy or farce?

 

[Jazzz]

Let me remind editor who Mark Whitby was.

Is a single, uncorrobated witness report as good as evidence gets? I don't think so.

 

[KeyboardJockey]

I totally agree with you about lizards and protocols, I believe these people do those that try to question 'what we are told to believe' a great disservice perhaps they do it on purpose.

I'm just an ordinary person who has tried to investigate the evidence that is in the public domain about the events of 7th July. I can't offer proof that 'something else happened' all I can do is examine the 'proof' of what we have been told happened. Only the truth stands up to rigorous investigation.

Shouting it's Briitain's Reichstag as if there is some hidden truth to say its not a bunch of religious maniacs behind it striikes me as conspiraloonacy of the highest order. This is not a case of a great evil being blamed on a religious minority which has been done against th eCatholics in t he past and neither is it a case of mistakin identity or an MI5 plot etc etc. It was few religious nutters who exist in most religions (and I should know I've met a few) joining a murder cult about as analogus with mainstream Islam as the Rev Jim Jones was to the Church of England.

I agree that there shoud be a public enquiry about this but it should be into how has the UK's foreign policy activities contributed to our targetting. If anyone should be the target of ire it should be our gibbet-worthy PM and not just the saps who carried these atrocities out.

Now I'm mindful that this thread has opened up some wounds and I'm going to say no more for a while on this subject.

 

[editor]

Is a single, uncorrobated witness report as good as evidence gets? I don't think so.

It's certainly better than the big fat zero amount of credible evidence that you and your fellow bedroom 'truthseekers' have come up with thus far to support your embarrassingly stupid, fact-free fruitloop fantasies.

 

[nino_savatte]

Murder she wrote

Anyone for mid-afternoon telly?

 

[editor]

Perhaps more people should have questioned the events surrounding the Reichstag fire and history would have turned out differently.

The Reichstag fire has absolutely fuck all to do with 7/7, despite your desperate attempts to suggest that there's some sort of obvious linkage.

 

[KeyboardJockey]

Anyone for mid-afternoon telly?

Does it have conspiraloons in it? Or people who'd rather have kids get polio and diptheria and smallpox than be vaccinated. It doesn't. Ok all right then.

 

[nino_savatte]

I love the way these conspiracy theorists drag in anything and everything off the street and conscript it to fight for their cause. how the fuck did the Reichstag Fire get mentioned in this thread?

What about the Battle of Manzikert? There were no eyewitnesses to speak of but we know it happened and that Romanus IV Diogenes was captured by the Seljuk Turks...there were no CCTV images available by the way.