Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

The 7/7 Report

editor said:
Could you give some specific examples of 7/7 "truth questioners" being locked up in a mental institution and also offer some examples about how the internet is being "controlled" to stop these people expressing their views please?

I won't even bother with your offensive "gas them all" comment apart from say that it was a truly moronic thing to say.

Idiot.

I didn't say 7/7 "truth questioners" were being locked up in mental institutions so I have nothing to prove. When I say 'Just look at 7/7' I am referring to the section of the narrative where it argued that the 7/7 terrorists may have been radicalised by 9/11 'conspiracy theories'.

But there is plenty of historical precedent where authoratarian regimes accuse their critics and people questioning official truths of being dangerous and/or insane and have locked them up in mental institutions or in the case of Nazi Germany sent to the gas chambers.

In an age when terrorist suspects are rounded up and thrown into hell holes like camp Xray or extradited in secret to face probable torture, I see nothing offensive in drawing parallels between the dangerously fascist tendencies of Bush (and his poodle Blair) and Nazi's solutions to people who disagreed with them.

Idiot yourself
 
sparticus said:
I didn't say 7/7 "truth questioners" were being locked up in mental institutions so I have nothing to prove. When I say 'Just look at 7/7' I am referring to the section of the narrative where it argued that the 7/7 terrorists may have been radicalised by 9/11 'conspiracy theories'.
Nice wriggle, but I'm afraid your words - and their context - are there for all to see:
sparticus said:
Just look at 7/7. Control the internet and lock all these 'conspiraloons' up in a mental institution. No better still, gas them all. They are sub-human
So, have you got any examples of any 9/11 or 7/7 'conspiraloons' being gassed and/or locked up in mental institutions and the internet being controlled in relation to 7/7 or not?

Or was it just a load of totally irrelevant, hyperbolic frothing?
 
sparticus said:
I think you are joking but in today's world it's hard to tell. I think this reference to 9/11 conspiracy theories is designed to lead the public to conclude just that. Allowing people to question official truths is dangerous. Just look at 7/7. Control the internet and lock all these 'conspiraloons' up in a mental institution. No better still, gas them all. They are sub-human


Yeah - because people taking the piss out of your stupid theories is *exactly* like how Hitler oppressed the Jews, you poor, persecuted thing.
 
Yossarian said:
Yeah - because people taking the piss out of your stupid theories is *exactly* like how Hitler oppressed the Jews, you poor, persecuted thing.
I think it's all part of the 'truth seeker' super-hero fantasy.
 
Yossarian said:
Yeah - because people taking the piss out of your stupid theories is *exactly* like how Hitler oppressed the Jews, you poor, persecuted thing.

What stupid theories of mine are you referring to?

I never said it was "exactly" the same, but there are similarities
 
editor said:
Nice wriggle, but I'm afraid your words - and their context - are there for all to see:
So, have you got any examples of any 9/11 or 7/7 'conspiraloons' being gassed and/or locked up in mental institutions and the internet being controlled in relation to 7/7 or not?

Or was it just a load of totally irrelevant, hyperbolic frothing?

Complete bullshit. My words are indeed there to be read in context to detective boys original post and the 7/7 narrative (as opposed to selectively quoting)

The 7/7 narrative argues that the bombers were influenced by 9/11 conspiracy theories.

To which detective boy (possibly in jest) concludes CT's are dangerous and should locked up.

I was merely taking detective boy's logic and expanding it.

That you choose to read it in another way is your business.

Care to comment on the evidence showing that in the recent past our intelligence services have been colluding with terrorists and that this may be one reason why many are not prepared to take the conclusions of this anonymous report on trust
 
Yossarian said:
Bollocks. Comparing yourself to oppressed Jews under Hitler is sinking very low indeed.

I am comparing our slide towards fascism as exemplified by Camp Xray and Extraordinary Rendition to the gradual slide towards fascism in Nazi Germany. Nothing low about that. Bollocks yourself
 
sparticus said:
I am comparing our slide towards fascism as exemplified by Camp Xray and Extraordinary Rendition to the gradual slide towards fascism in Nazi Germany. Nothing low about that. Bollocks yourself
Well done that's exactly as I see it. Except that some people here prefer the slide with eyes wide shut.

Those of us who refuse to accept the 'move on, nothing to see here' mentality and instead opt for, 'hang on I just want to check this out before I'm prepared to move on' get 'abused' as 'truth seekers'. FFS when did truth seeker become a term of abuse? Didn't Marx say something about everything becoming it's opposite under Capitalism?
 
What is this "slide towards fascism" that our conspiracy loving pals are talking about? I get the feeling that none of them actually knows what fascism is and would probably call someone like Blair (or Thatcher) a fascist.

Only the intellectually lazy dole out words like "fascist" when they really mean something else.
 
Prole said:
Except that some people here prefer the slide with eyes wide shut.
As opposed to 'truth seekers' people like you who get caught out lying and then try and deny it, yes?
 
nino_savatte said:
What is this "slide towards fascism" that our conspiracy loving pals are talking about? I get the feeling that none of them actually knows what fascism is and would probably call someone like Blair (or Thatcher) a fascist.

Only the intellectually lazy dole out words like "fascist" when they really mean something else.
The merging of corporate and state power. PPP PFI etc etc
 
Prole said:
The merging of corporate and state power. PPP PFI etc etc

If that's your definition of "fascism" then if no conspiraloons at all have been sectioned then that's a sign of serious failings in our mental health system.


See what I did there? Three-step logic.

* Awaits expansion *
 
Prole said:
The merging of corporate and state power. PPP PFI etc etc

Oh really? You've left out the most salient aspects of fascism: nationalism and glorification of the military. The latter two are noticeably absent, which means that there is no slide towards fascism.
 
laptop said:
If that's your definition of "fascism" then if no conspiraloons at all have been sectioned then that's a sign of serious failings in our mental health system.


See what I did there? Three-step logic.

* Awaits expansion *
A major component methinks.
Your logic is that if I say 'the merging of corporate and state power' = 'mental illness', would you like to expand on that? Or is it the level of debate on these boards to accuse people of being 'mad' if we disagree with them?
 
Prole said:
Your logic is that if I say 'the merging of corporate and state power' = 'mental illness', would you like to expand on that? Or is it the level of debate on these boards to accuse people of being 'mad' if we disagree with them?
I don't know if you're mad, but you're most definitely wrong and talking bollocks.

Mind you, I'm trying hard not to harbour doubts about the mental state of someone who makes up stuff and then denies it, and then goes on about puddles as proof of a massive, murderous conspiracy.

And plastic bags too, of course.

Most odd.
 
Prole said:
A major component methinks.
Your logic is that if I say 'the merging of corporate and state power' = 'mental illness', would you like to expand on that? Or is it the level of debate on these boards to accuse people of being 'mad' if we disagree with them?

Nationalism and glorification of the military are the defining characteristics of a fascist state.

Funny how you avoided those points - innit?
 
nino_savatte said:
Oh really? You've left out the most salient aspects of fascism: nationalism and glorification of the military. The latter two are noticeably absent, which means that there is no slide towards fascism.
I've seen the Flag of St George flying everywhere recently. Increased police powers, 28 day lock-up (interestingly mooted by none other than Peter Power on Newsnight in the days following 7th July). The creation of an external enemy as in the war of terror, the creation of an internal enemy (young muslims if we believe the official report of 7th July). ID cards giving the state far reaching powers. etc etc etc
 
nino_savatte said:
Nationalism and glorification of the military are the defining characteristics of a fascist state.

Funny how you avoided those points - innit?
They may be the defining 'characteristics' but the merging of corporate and state power is fascism's economic base.
 
Prole said:
I've seen the Flag of St George flying everywhere recently. Increased police powers, 28 day lock-up (interestingly mooted by none other than Peter Power on Newsnight in the days following 7th July). The creation of an external enemy as in the war of terror, the creation of an internal enemy (young muslims if we believe the official report of 7th July). ID cards giving the state far reaching powers. etc etc etc

Sorry but that doesn't mean the UK has become a fascist state. Where are the legions of concerned citizens militia's that have organised along fascist lines? Hoiw many opposition MPs have been beaten up or murdered? How many dissidents are incarcerated for their political beliefs? None.

Just because the flag of St George flies over buildings and on cars in England, doesn't mean a thing. Note if you will, the way I specified England as opposed to the UK.

Your thesis is weaker than an hour old kitten.
 
editor said:
I don't know if you're mad, but you're most definitely wrong and talking bollocks.

Mind you, I'm trying hard not to harbour doubts about the mental state of someone who makes up stuff and then denies it, and then goes on about puddles as proof of a massive, murderous conspiracy.

And plastic bags too, of course.

Most odd.
I'm wondering if that only applies to us 'truth seekers' Ed as I can remember other people on these boards claiming they caught an earlier train or even a mainline one. Are they liars? Or is that a term of abuse reserved only for those you so obviously disagree with? I can see why you are Editor and not Moderator, moderation would be beyond you.
 
sparticus said:
I am comparing our slide towards fascism as exemplified by Camp Xray and Extraordinary Rendition to the gradual slide towards fascism in Nazi Germany. Nothing low about that. Bollocks yourself

Actually I think what's happening today is qualitively different from 1930's Germany. Different time, different place. I'm not sure how useful comparisons are (apart from meaningless rhetoric that is).
 
Prole said:
They may be the defining 'characteristics' but the merging of corporate and state power is fascism's economic base.

No, you clearly do not know what fascism is and if you have to conflate it with state power alone then it isn't fascism simply becaue you say it is so. Nationalism and the glorification of the military are absent. Therefore a fascist state does not exist in the UK.

Try reading some real history for a change. You could start with the Portuguese republic under Salazar or read up on Mussolini...but I know that's too much for you and it doesn't come from one of Rense's sites.
 
Prole said:
Didn't Marx say something about everything becoming it's opposite under Capitalism?

Not as far as I'm aware. I think you're getting confused about the dialectic there.
 
Back
Top Bottom