So you don't think he'd weighed up the inevitable threats to his family beforehand and these came as a complete surprise?
You think he was expecting help from the army? What help? Where's the evidence they were going to help but backed out?
If he was already angry with the military heads why would he have expected help from the army?
Again with apologies to certain posters, but I had been in Moscow for several weeks when the attempted coup took place in August 1991, as well as for a couple of months the previous winter. The seeds of the August coup were set the previous December, when Gorbachev was pressured, as the economy disintegrated and society dissolved into a remarkably quiet and largely non-violent chaos, into appointing several so-called hardliners (who didn't turn out to be anything of the kind, at least in their actions) into government. This was massive news in the SU, with the newly liberalised Soviet media bitterly divided on the issue, reflecting the divisions in the ruling elites. The groundwork was clearly prepared over the next eight months, and by the time the coup came those who mattered had already picked sides as, even if they might not have known when, they knew it was coming.
Nothing that happened in August '91 seemed spontaneous*, but the western media-or at least CNN, which was all that was available in Moscow, and only if you knew where to access it, took everything at face value, just as in June this year. And I experienced the coup as a surreal event (no drugs but plenty of vodka and beer-which under Perestroika had to be obtained largely on the black market, the increasing prevalence of which was one reason given for the coup.) It was real enough, however, although the surprising half-heartedness of it has led not only me to wonder if it was staged in order to break the political deadlock and pave the way for economic 'shock therapy.' Of course, the real coup came in October '93. Hardly anybody died in August '91, but when the, at the time (before NATO pissed him off) western poodle Yeltsin bombarded his own parliament to enable de-facto rule by decree, and turned central Moscow into a war zone, many died, only for it to quickly backfire and pave the way for the inevitable reaction against neoliberal-inspired falling living standards and life-expectancy, and the authoritarian figure which turned out to be Putin.
The point, however, is in the preparation. The differences between '91 and 2023 appear marked.
*There is also speculation that the overthrow of Ceausescu in '89 was far from the spontaneous uprsing it was portrayed as, as opposed to a Soviet-inspired coup, with middle-ranking officials of the Rumanian CP pushed to the fore. Ceausescu, with his resistance to Gorbachev-style reform, had long been regarded as an enemy among those who had maneouvred their way into influence in Moscow. Bucharest was apparently full of Russians in the weeks leading up to the 'uprising.' Naturally there had to be a few thousand deaths to make it appear authentic. This is not to say that most of those on either side didn't believe in what they were fighting for.