You'd have thought there must be. I mean, it's the official figure. They must write it down. Can't bloody find it anywhere tho.
http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/publications/all-releases.html?definition=tcm:77-21589 ?
You'd have thought there must be. I mean, it's the official figure. They must write it down. Can't bloody find it anywhere tho.
2003 is the earliest I can find on there.
This from the BBC uses the ONS
2003 is the earliest I can find on there.
At http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/publications/re-reference-tables.html?edition=tcm:77-47008 there's a 2MB ZIP of PDFs in which they promise Unemployment levels: by sex, January–March 1971 to July–September 2005
I need a proper precise number , for reasons stated before - and that looks too complicated for half the pub at that time!how about 'how many days were lost in strikes in 1978 (with the winter of discontent) versus how many days were lost because of increased unemployment five years later under thatcher?' (under 10 million versus over 500 million so over 50 times as many by my calculation).
0.2mill is (or was) pretty consistently the difference between the 'unemployed' figure and the 'claimant count,' I wonder why a right-wing board would choose the lower figure.I like to argue that it was 3.6 million, with an actual figure somewhere in the region of 5.5 million but I attempted to argue this on a predominantly right-wing site, and I was informed, in no uncertain manner, that I was exaggerating the figure by .2 Million (like it fookin' matters at that stage but hey ho, they're allowed their opinion, also)
Maggie! Maggie! Maggie!
Dead! Dead! Dead!
For the last actual question I am tempted to ask 'complete the following joke: She's only been down there a week and she's already ...belboid If you want a politically interesting one go for give one good reason the cow illegally tried out the poll tax in Scotland. Pm me the answers and I'll choose a winner No way can you be accused of cheating/favouritism etc.
those people have never been 'young' in their lives
those people have never been 'young' in their lives
rosecore said:
how about 'how many days were lost in strikes in 1978 (with the winter of discontent) versus how many days were lost because of increased unemployment five years later under thatcher?' (under 10 million versus over 500 million so over 50 times as many by my calculation).
I thought about downloading an audio file of Big Ben, and playing it every quarter hour, but to be truthful I can't be bothered, so I'll just ignore the whole thing. Metaphorically turn my back, so to speak.
proper classic
Winter of discontent was six weeks in Jan-Feb 1979 not 1978.
Here is the political director of the TaxPayers’ Alliance from when Thatcher was alive:
You're also a pervert.Does Thatcher look like she's giving the bastard a crafty left-hand tug, or am I just an exceedingly sick and vile pervert?
Understandable. I could only wish that the funeral and the lead up to it hadn't been used to bury so much other news here.The funeral was today, wasn't it?
It's sort of been knocked out of the news here by this Boston business.
You're also a pervert.
You're one voucher down.You say the sweetest things!