I've just done the test twice, once telling the truth about us being child-free, and a second time telling the test we in fact had three kids.
The results given were exactly the same for both tests.
Utter, utter fail of a test.
This is because pork and chicken don't emit anthropogenic methane and therefore are considered to have a lesser carbon footprint.It only specifies Beef and Lamb...no other meat mentioned.
I just left it blank.
Apparently my score is 4.5 tons co2 per year despite having a well insulated house, solar panels, biomass heating and recycling everything I can, no car and don't fly anywhere.![]()
I've just done the test twice, once telling the truth about us being child-free, and a second time telling the test we in fact had three kids.
The results given were exactly the same for both tests.
Utter, utter fail of a test.
Oh wow, so it's even more garbage than I thought. The cheeky fuckers are asking for money and all!
It's not about individual choice.
The top one hundred polluting companies & the richest seven countries produce the bulk
How do you mean "invasive"?i started the test but it's pretty invasive (as others have said) and stopped. anyway, I'm absolutely a carbon hero.
hardlyHow do you mean "invasive"?
It's anonymous....
![]()
hardly
they still have your IP addressI gave my name as Sugar and didnt give any email address.
Posted this is in response to an article PM had on the climate change threadSo nothing I as an individual can do will halt global warming?that is very demoralising.
Just 100 companies responsible for 71% of global emissions, study saysOf course, consumers aren’t entirely blameless, particularly the world’s wealthiest individuals, but the idea that oil is a purely demand-side industry is ridiculous. In the 1980s, for example, when the oil crisis was finally over (oil prices had risen by 300 percent at one point) oil companies were very worried about the fact that Americans had gotten good at saving energy, so good that demand seemed to have permanently dipped.
Did they reduce supply accordingly? No, they looked for ways to drive demand back up, tinkering with production and lobbying for policies that would incentivize increased fossil fuel use. More recently, as companies have grappled with a natural gas glut, they have not stopped fracking, but merely found a new revenue stream — plastic.
I don't think "Have you recently murdered anybody?" and "Are you a Russian spy?" were on the list of questions.they still have your IP address
they still have your IP address
![]()
Privacy Policy - Climate Hero
climatehero.me
Don't think it's down to meat consumption. I put 1-2 per week. 1 is spag bol which won't have much beef in it. The other is a kebab.Secret burger basement?
Well.. no..you don't have to pay...![]()
they still have your IP address
Why? It's only your personal result.
Come to think of it...
I dont know why they ask about kids![]()
Kids are a major source of CO2 emissions. Not surprising considering you're raising at least one entire person to maturity.
I only got off lightly because I buy renewable electricity.
I use 4059 kwh a year - 774 of those are for heating
If that was from coal generation it would be 4 tonnes of CO2
It only specifies beef and lamb eaten for lunch or dinner, having steak for breakfast apparently has no environmental impactIt only specifies Beef and Lamb...no other meat mentioned.