sihhi
Tyranny, like hell, is not easily conquered
Cohen is pimping this around: Nice Guys of the SWP. Some long term posters might remember this: SWP/novelist- call for feedback.
How the hell do you remember that?
Cohen is pimping this around: Nice Guys of the SWP. Some long term posters might remember this: SWP/novelist- call for feedback.
Ok, 'it's right' not 'he's'Oh, i've not read it or anything like that.
it's all in the files. and you thought we were joking.How the hell do you remember that?
He's got it all cross referenced on index cards.How the hell do you remember that?
He's got it all cross referenced on index cards.
it's all in the files. and you thought we were joking.
How the hell do you remember that?
I think they did, but there was a sound reason for it. The government was about to pull the plug on the finances for Liverpool Council because it was refusing to impose cuts. By issuing the redundancy notices before that happened it meant that the sacked workers would at least be entitled to redundancy pay and the government would have to finance it. Not a great result however but a last throw at the government.I don't think they did issue redundancy notices by cab did they? iirc that was a myth
90 day consultation period. Which, incidentally, the government are getting rid of ostensibly because it's perceived to be unnecessary and burdensome for businesses but in reality because it provides sufficient time for workers to organise.They werent redundancy notices they were giving out but 90 day notices, but it was a tactical disaster.
Yes I know the difference between the Section 188 notices which is what were delivered by taxi, and the final redundancy notice which gets issued after the 90 day consultation period. Essentially the process once begun goes through to completion and the consultation only allows the details of the redundancy to be worked out with the unions. As for a tactical disaster, the war was already lost by then.They werent redundancy notices they were giving out but 90 day notices, but it was a tactical disaster.
Yes I know the difference between the Section 188 notices which is what were delivered by taxi, and the final redundancy notice which gets issued after the 90 day consultation period. Essentially the process once begun goes through to completion and the consultation only allows the details of the redundancy to be worked out with the unions. As for a tactical disaster, the war was already lost by then.
I have read about how Liverpool Council was run by Militant and if you ignore the character assassination of some of the leaders in the gutter press (Hatton was not as pure as the driven snow to be fair) the decisions on spending priorities were in support of the working people of the city.
the experience demonstrated it doesn't work.
Are you saying 'pathfinder' was a great success?6,300 families rehoused from tenements, flats and maisonettes
2, 873 tenement flats demolished
1,315 walk-up flats demolished
2,086 flats/maisonettes demolished
4,800 houses and bungalows built
7,400 houses and flats improved
600 houses/bungalows created by ‘top-downing’ 1,315 walk-up flats
25 new Housing Action Areas being developed
6 new nursery classes built and open
17 Community Comprehensive Schools established following a massive re-organisation
£10million spent on school improvements
Five new sports centres, one with a leisure pool attached, built and open
Two thousand additional jobs provided for in Liverpool City Council Budget
Ten thousand people per year employed on Council’s Capital Programme
Three new parks built
There's been a whole host of minorly prominent people coming out of leninist or trot groups recently and arguing that what is needed is a regroupment around a broad pluralist party that allows free discussion, fractions and all that - yet most of them, as far as i can see anyway, have got no further in their re-appraisal than reading Lars Lih's Rediscovering Lenin then arguing that the bolsheviks pre-1917 are the best example of this wonderful new creature that's needed today, in fact the examplar.
Exhibit #1
So you haven't read the book thenDo the SP regard their brief control of Liverpool as an inspiring model then? I don't think history has been kind to the hyperbole about that period that was in 'Liverpool: A City that Dared to Fight'. Anyone remember Degsy? The coming Lenin according to that book. Where is he now? Sorry to drift off topic but it's the quiet hour and run of SWSS protest letters have probably ceased for the weekend.
We didn't then eitherThe real point is whether Militant were cunts and wrong or trying their best for the workers and wrong - I go with the second option: Liverpool was a brave attempt to build a working class fight back in one city and the experience demonstrated it doesn't work.
Indeed something I presume the SP agree with as I don't think they seriously argue for the capture of city councils by them and allies any more?
It meant getting two months money for the council workers if they had gone ahead with their plans (they were balloting for all out city wide general strike). Liverpool was isolated and then defeated by the Labour and Trade Union bureaucracy not by the Troy government.I think they did, but there was a sound reason for it. The government was about to pull the plug on the finances for Liverpool Council because it was refusing to impose cuts. By issuing the redundancy notices before that happened it meant that the sacked workers would at least be entitled to redundancy pay and the government would have to finance it. Not a great result however but a last throw at the government.
i have read some articles etc about lenin and the whole principle of democratic centralism tho and suffice to say that the facts are very different from anything i have heard from trotskyist organisations.
He didn't. His wife did.
I have it still. If you want to argue about Militant's building up of Hatton as a great labour leader I'll dig out some quotes when I get home. But it's not the SP's finest moment. Incidentally, I had the pleasure of being on Hatton's TV show long after he turned celebrity lefty.So you haven't read the book then
Castleford.
I have it still. If you want to argue about Militant's building up of Hatton as a great labour leader I'll dig out some quotes when I get home. But it's not the SP's finest moment. Incidentally, I had the pleasure of being on Hatton's TV show long after he turned celebrity lefty.
Right now I can't see any movement that's ready to replace Leninism as an organised left wing movement in Europe. Part of the reason is that Leninist groups, and other Social Democratic parties have been very good at squashing their rivals to the left. But now that the Trotskyist Leninists are falling apart, and the Communist Parties have stopped pretending to be anticapitalist, there's no other movement that's near to being coherent enough to grow in their place.However leninist parties at least in the UK have been the most successful form of organisation on the left and they have often achieved a lot of good things as well as bad, they help people get confident and organise in the workplace. I do think that the point about leninist parties sometimes seeming to hold back and go through "organised" channels such as trade unions, when people who supposedly just have a "trade unionist consciousness" want to go further, is a valid one. The thing is tho what do you do? And I don't know if I have an answer to that. I would also say that a lot of anarchist organisations also suffer from a similar problem to leninism in that they want to be a vanguard and there are some people who become self appointed leaders etc.
The real point is whether Militant were cunts and wrong or trying their best for the workers and wrong - I go with the second option: Liverpool was a brave attempt to build a working class fight back in one city and the experience demonstrated it doesn't work.
Indeed something I presume the SP agree with as I don't think they seriously argue for the capture of city councils by them and allies any more?
I was looking at some stuff about "council communists" earlier and some of that looked quite interesting. But I don't know whether it would work or what that type of organisation has achieved in practice, especially in the last 50 years or so.
Dunno.
The problem with autodidacticism is that you never properly feel as if you've caught up.