J Ed
Follow Back Pro Expropriation
re: earlier discussion in the thread
Progressive Company Pays Both Men And Women 78% Of What They Should Be Earning
Progressive Company Pays Both Men And Women 78% Of What They Should Be Earning
re: earlier discussion in the thread
Progressive Company Pays Both Men And Women 78% Of What They Should Be Earning
i don't think it's either one or the other.I think we established upthread that there are feminists and there are twats, and you are either one or the other.
Wow. We knew that gender inequality in America was bad, but according to an alarming new study, it’s actually much worse than anyone could’ve thought.
A recently released report from the U.S. Census Bureau revealed that female CEOs in America make a paltry 258 times what their average employee makes, while male CEOs make an average of 331 times more than theirs. That’s a pay gap of nearly 23 percent, which in dollar value—per median salary of U.S. CEOs—translates to an average disparity of $2.57 million, or enough to buy approximately 12 Aston Martins.
These numbers empirically prove that inequality is alive and well in the United States. It’s hard to fathom that in 2015, women who take the same cutthroat routes to the peak of the corporate ladder as their male peers are still only earning the commensurate income of a combined 258 subordinates. This means these women are being forced to get by on just $8 million to $9 million a year (and that’s before taxes!).
If true equality is ever to be achieved, then the wealth needs to funnel away from the pockets of the topmost male earners and into the offshore accounts of the women who are every bit as deserving. Why should male executives be able to afford five or six mountain estates across the world while their female counterparts are forced to make do with just four?
Share this article if you believe that gender discrimination is out of control and that female CEOs should be able to afford the same number of private jets and luxury yachts as male CEOs. It’s just what’s right.
You can't be a dad to a young girl without thinking about female roles in society. A lot.
they may be saying such things because they are terrified of being raped, and try to differentiate themselves from women who have been raped in an effort to convince themselves that it won't happen to them.
It's not right, and can't prevent rape obviously but it's not as simple as educating them on political and social issues. It's sheer fear.
So not supporting equality for women is okay?i don't think it's either one or the other.
of course notSo not supporting equality for women is okay?
I'd love to think that was a piss-take, but I fear it isn't. Same crap Andrea Dworkin used to come out with. Insulting to men and about 99 per cent of women as well. If she's serious, I feel sad for her.
I'd love to think that was a piss-take, but I fear it isn't. Same crap Andrea Dworkin used to come out with. Insulting to men and about 99 per cent of women as well. If she's serious, I feel sad for her.
A fella I know keeps spouting and proclaiming about stuff and justifies it by stating that he's proud to be a feminist. He's sometimes arguing with actual women when he does this.
Every time it happens, I think "Well I'm not sure that you are a feminist... And I wonder if any man can really claim to be one... One the other hand, why can't / shouldn't a man be a feminist...? Is it sexist to say that a man can't sufficiently understand or appreciate the female perspective?"
So to sum up, I don't know, but I'd be interested to know what others think.
Not much. She said that "romance is rape embellished with meaningful looks". She said it more than once, as in this article. She also said this kind of thing:I think it's a good bit more extreme than Dworkin.
Under patriarchy, no woman is safe to live her life, or to love, or to mother children. Under patriarchy, every woman is a victim, past, present, and future. Under patriarchy, every woman's daughter is a victim, past, present, and future. Under patriarchy, every woman's son is her potential betrayer and also the inevitable rapist or exploiter of another woman
In feminist groups I've had involvement with in the past, the terms for supportive men tended to be 'pro-feminist' or 'feminist ally'. Though I'm not precious personally if a man calls himself a feminist, what is more important is respecting and listening to women's experiences and voices first and foremost (rather than dominating them).
People have defended Dworkin to me on here, but I'm afraid I can't take any defence of her seriously. She was a good writer, maybe that's what takes people in. I don't know.
Did you read the article I linked to as well? Is that also not in context?She did say that, in the same way that Germaine Greer said 'women have no idea how much men hate them', which is another punchy quote which needs to be taken in the context of the whole thesis, I'd say.
Which Dworkin never said.I lose my sense of humour quite quickly when I'm called a rapist, and when any woman I have sex with is called an exploited victim.
I've indulged in romance in the past. Fairly cackhandedly, I'll admit.Which Dworkin never said.
romance boils down to rape
So not supporting equality for women is okay?
Did you read the article I linked to as well? Is that also not in context?.
Just because she's been in an abusive relationship it doesn't mean she instinctively understands the subject of rape more or has more insightOne of the referred to women was in an abusive relationship, so it's not like she shouldn't have a bit more insight. Some of the stuff she believes and questions she asks are because she's not terribly smart or at least spends too much time absorbed in celeb culture. For example, and not related to the topic here, she asked if Australia has Xmas on the same day as us. When we told her yes, she then went to ask why it's sunny...
Nothing in that article says that all men are rapists. At all. It is a critique of the horrible concept of "romance" in patriarchy.I've indulged in romance in the past. Fairly cackhandedly, I'll admit.
I keep being told she never said stuff, but she did. In that article I linked to she said this:
And I'm not quoting out of context. If you read the article, she isn't being ironic.
Nothing in that article says that all men are rapists. At all. It is a critique of the horrible concept of "romance" in patriarchy.
See, now you're misquoting me. I didn't say that she said that all men are rapists.Nothing in that article says that all men are rapists. At all. It is a critique of the horrible concept of "romance" in patriarchy.
"I lose my sense of humour quite quickly when I'm called a rapist"See, now you're misquoting me. I didn't say that she said that all men are rapists.
ffs read my posts. 'I've engaged in romance in the past'."I lose my sense of humour quite quickly when I'm called a rapist"
Let's save time—what do you think Dworkin is calling you and why do you think that?
Thats the sort of shit im on about.
Much more extreme than greer and dworkin. I find this stuff very hard to relate to. There's a fucking difference and im not just saying this, because im brainwashed by patriarchy. you dont feel violated and dirty after sex with a man that you enjoy. Because you enjoy it! AFAIK she also said that dildos were an anti gay conspiracy if its her blog im thinking of.
Also saying that all sex with a man is rape completely trivialises rape. And what about lesbians who rape other lesbians?