Shayler - talk in Brixton - Wed. 2nd Nov.
- Thread starter TeeJay
- Start date
Larry O'Hara
Well-Known Member
fela fan said:
1) If you mean Shayler, I know more than enough about him thankyou, fruitloop.
2) If you mean the 9/11 crowd, I judge them by their aggressive intolerant attempts to protect Shayler & prevent him being questioned.
3) Now why don't you go off & play with some tinfoil or a remote controlled aircraft.
Larry O'Hara
Well-Known Member
fela fan said:
Speak for yourself.
Streathamite
ideological dogmatist
err...you have had four years to land a killer punch on this one!fela fan said:
editor said:
Well now maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaan, let me think...
Oh, i just cannot process my brain fast enough, it got caught up in fuckloads of 'a's. Have no idea what the fuck happened there.
Oh well, forgive me man.
Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
previously i've only heard police officers refer to marijuana as wacky backy.editor said:
Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
not knowingly...editor said:
but i've never previously heard a non-cop use the phrase. did you pick it up from a friendly constable? or even an unfriendly one?
editor
hiraethified
A quick search for "wacky backy" on Google yields over 10,000 results.Pickman's model said:
You'll also see it referenced on a host of drug information sites, so it's clearly widely used.
Unlike you, I've never had a discussion with a policeman on the subject.
So how many policemen have you had chats about "wacky backy", then?
And why?
editor said:
But to actually answer your question, no.
What on earth made you think that? It's actually almost impossible these days.
If it was an excess of 'a's, then i think you're the one on 'wacky backy', coz i only had a stutter on the key 'a' due to a reaction to your own stutter on the key 'a'.
In other words i feigned an 'a' in riposte to your stuttered 'a'.
Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
i wouldn't describe them as chats - i don't tend to have involved discussions with coppers searching me.editor said:
Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
too bloody often!fela fan said:
i wouldn't know.
editor said:
Yeah, the post was meant to be one post higher (ie before PMs).
And to answer your question, if it were the case that PM does have lots of chats (which I'm sure he actually doesn't) with policemen, it may go some way to explaining why he regularly agrees with them on, for example, estimates of demonstration sizes.
It was also a cheap dig and I said to myself I'd make an effort not to post them, so I take back the post, and the implicit criticism.
bristol_citizen
Well-Known Member
Sorry to interrupt "the debate" but just to go back a bit...Larry O'Hara said:
Thankfully I don't have to answer this question, I'm not involved in the GP or any other party so don't have to worry about expelling anyone.
My only observation would be that any party seriously expecting people to vote for them might find there's a bit of tension between this and fundamentalist approaches to free speech and wacky ideas.
Is providing a platform for fruitbats, bearded weirdoes and extraordinarily stoned former MI5 officers really the way to electoral success?
Or perhaps providing a free speech platform is more important than electoral success?
bristol_citizen
Well-Known Member
Is there such a thing as a conspiracy theorist who's not a pot-head?TeeJay said:
Streathamite
ideological dogmatist
actually, I think it is. there'll always be other elections. lose yer internal freedoms and you're fatally compromised - look at New Labourbristol_citizen said:
Similar threads
