Never said that. Plenty of people from England follow Scottish politics.
You might want us to be filthy nationalists for whatever reason, it is just not true.
Hopefully he will be getting a visit soon, that's not acceptable, even online.
Never said that. Plenty of people from England follow Scottish politics.
You might want us to be filthy nationalists for whatever reason, it is just not true.
I was against 'compulsory voting', but having seen the genuine engagement in this campaign, and also the colossal turnout, I've shifted my view. Perhaps if people had to vote, they would engage more with the political process. Who knows, Scotland might return a 'Real Conservative' government.
Australia has had some of the most right wing and ideological Gov'ts of all 'western' democracies, Howard for one, Now Abbot...
especially on benefits and immigration
That comes across as quite an anti-English sentiment to be honest, and makes you look a bit paranoid and silly. Equating former colonies that the UK took over, often by force, with Scotland being part of the Union is just daft.I would say the first part is probably true, would not have done a few weeks ago. I would say that Scotland's independence movement is something of a national liberation and similar to any former colony of the UK. Mainly after seeing the way in which the establishment (particularly the broadcast/print media) and the rest of the country looks at Scottish people and our politics. Currently, I would say that people on the left should support that.
Totally agree - that's well out of order.Hopefully he will be getting a visit soon, that's not acceptable, even online.
Equating former colonies that the UK took over, often by force, with Scotland being part of the Union is just daft.
What were the clearances?In the past maybe, but Culloden, the Clearances, etc, say otherwise.
I suggest that you take a closer look at that resource and then come back and explain why the clearances were an english imposition on scotland and characteristic of classic colonies of empire - as per your post above. Just so we know that you're not just glibly parroting nationalist myths.
That comes across as quite an anti-English sentiment to be honest, and makes you look a bit paranoid and silly. Equating former colonies that the UK took over, often by force, with Scotland being part of the Union is just daft.
I suggest that you take a closer look at that resource and then come back and explain why the clearances were an english imposition on scotland and characteristic of classic colonies of empire - as per your post above. Just so we know that you're not just glibly parroting nationalist myths.
Who would ever suggest such a daft scenario though? Clearly it was a cross-nation pursuit of naked class interest. Such as happened with the english enclosures and the expulsion of millions from the land/agriculture in England. Who were the colonists there?I agree that it was not directly a result of British tyranny, but was largely the result of imposing British law in Scotland. True, it was the Scottish ruling classes that were more than happy to implement the law, but I think it is simplistic and wrong to say the British government had their hands clean here.
Fair enough, but you mentioned coercion here, so where did that come from and who did the coercing?Not my intention. However, I would not necessarily associated English people with colonialism, and they were often victims of exploitation. I would say that there were elements of coercion in the referendum campaign. True, there was not red coats in the street, but, then, again not all of Britain's conquests were through the barrel of a gun. I guess I consider Scotland in a similar situation to a place like Bermuda, although they do have more autonomy. I consider that a colony, and largely kept in 'the family of nations' through elements of coercion, and policies that are not always in the interests of the Bermudan people.
Somehow I can't see a sudden swing to the tories in Scotland!Btw salmond seems to now be saying that the UK leaving the EU would be grounds for another referendum - so come on YES voters, get behind Cameron and the tories and support their 2015 election campaign in order to get that 2017 referendum.
Nationalism makes for strange bedfellows - this chap might be angry enough to do something daft:Somehow I can't see a sudden swing to the tories in Scotland!
Willie Cameron, a yes voting businessman who owns the area's Cobbs hotel and cafe chain, agrees. "We are one of the most politically aware countries in the world. People have become very savvy and politics will never be the same."
"The Scots and the English are two completely different beings, two completely different psyches. The English are Anglo Saxons. The Scots are Celts. In my view they are as different as Arabs and Jews."
Fair enough, but you mentioned coercion here, so where did that come from and who did the coercing?
I ask because I'm genuinely curious as to why you take the position you do, and obviously don't agree that England is to blame for everything (although it's certainly not a paragon of virtue either).
I can't agree that Scotland's similar to Bermuda - it's not a tax haven and it certainly isn't hot and sunny!
link?Going by some of the tabloids, the Scots may be about to enter their pantheon of hate figures, well at least the ones in Glasgow or who are poor and voted yes.
"You've got to think with your head," agrees Ferguson. Things will change now anyway with devo max, he argues. Scotland will control its own destiny. "So why would you want to break up Britain, one of the greatest countries in the world?"
link?
Does this tell us anything
no it's not, and I have no idea why DairyQueen thought it necessary or reasonable to bring it into this thread in response to a post of mine. Should I take it as a threat, or is it simply intended as a really nasty insult? Either way, it's an appalling way to conduct a debate.Hopefully he will be getting a visit soon, that's not acceptable, even online.
no it's not, and I have no idea why DairyQueen thought it necessary or reasonable to bring it into this thread in response to a post of mine. Should I take it as a threat, or is it simply intended as a really nasty insult? Either way, it's an appalling way to conduct a debate.
Genetically speaking, the English have more in common with a crab than with a Scotchman