Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Savile being used as a wedge issue to attack BBC independence

what either/or logic. BBC should be criticised to the hilt for this fuck up AND it should be defended from privatisation etc.
 
The unstated assumption behind a lot of the defence is that everyone else is an idiot who does whatever the tv says and the BBC says things that aren't as bad as fox news, so people wouldn't become like americans with the BBC. And this at a time when the BBC is facilitating US style welfare provisions, reduction in social support and so on.
The implication of this is that Fox News may as well take over from the BBC, as the Beeb has not been suffiently robust on the cuts.
 
The implication of this is that Fox News may as well take over from the BBC, as the Beeb has not been suffiently robust on the cuts.
More either/or logic. Why not imagine a BBC not run by an elite for an elite and padding it out with nonsense about public service? Why not BBC under democratic community control? Or maybe it really, is as your either/or logic dictates, - fox news or the current BBC.

(Cue next post, hey i really like those proposed things too! Bit odd that other people arguing it are put in the either/or box though eh? Whereas you are just simply free)
 
Why the heck do we get this stupid binary thinking when anyone criticizes the BBC they shriek on about America and fox news.
In reality the BBC with adverts would probably be just that. Or like Channel four (which never gets compared to for some reason)
 
what? I'm not defending what the BBC did - it was totally wrong - and the management which presided over the culture of silence should be for the chop. But does that mean we should be perfectly happy for the Murdochs to finally deliver the axe to national public broadcasting?
2 fine sentences, with a weasly, politician 'but does that mean' in the middle. Great stuff.
 
what? I'm not defending what the BBC did - it was totally wrong - and the management which presided over the culture of silence should be for the chop. But does that mean we should be perfectly happy for the Murdochs to finally deliver the axe to national public broadcasting?
the management which presided over the culture of silence has already largely departed; that is, the people who were there while sir jimmy savile obe kcsg was there have probably all gone by now.

incidentally, while we're hearing a lot about the bbc in all this, perhaps some bile should be saved for the honours system: i wonder how many nonces have been given obes and mbes and the like.
 
incidentally, while we're hearing a lot about the bbc in all this, perhaps some bile should be saved for the honours system: i wonder how many nonces have been given obes and mbes and the like.
Good point. I just read he was knighted in 96, which was some time after there had been police investigations and some sort of 'official' BBC investigation into him. When there was also the wider swirl of rumours at the BBC, you do wonder what investigations the committee on honours (or whatever system it was in 96) did. Would assume there were at least police checks? Even pre Sohan, which highlighted the lack of evidence sharing when there was no conviction, you'd think it wasn't beyond the civil servants to ask some straightforward questions.
 
I agree with Wilf. They should have to do criminal record checks before knighting someone. If they discover they are a bad un, just don't tell them so that when the Queen taps them on the shoulder with her sword, she can swing around hard and chop their head clean off.
 
Ironically, whatever minimal checks the honours committee would have done might well have been the most rigorous checks undertaken throughout his whole nonce career. Certainly beats the 'official' BBC investigation:
'What's all these rumours I've been hearing Jim, are you a nonce?'
'No'
'Fair enough. Right, anyway, we've got the next series organised, Gary Glitter has agreed to appear in the first show...'.
 
What's this crap about BBC "independence"?

The same BBC which deliberately reversed its news footage of the sequence of events during the battle of Orgreave to make it look as though miners not police were responsible for starting the violence?

The same BBC which produced the disgraceful propagandist Panorama episode which justified the Israeli raid on the Gaza flotilla?

The same BBC which is cheering on Tory austerity and demonising the unemployed?

All privatising the BBC would mean is a pro government propaganda channel with adverts instead of a pro government propaganda channel with a licence fee to avoid.

Fuck the BBC.
 
what either/or logic. BBC should be criticised to the hilt for this fuck up...

It's hardly a fuck-up. More a result of institutional and organisational flaws coming home to roost. "Fuck-up" makes it sound accidental, rather than the result of neglect.
 
What's this crap about BBC "independence"?

The same BBC which deliberately reversed its news footage of the sequence of events during the battle of Orgreave to make it look as though miners not police were responsible for starting the violence?

The same BBC which produced the disgraceful propagandist Panorama episode which justified the Israeli raid on the Gaza flotilla?

The same BBC which is cheering on Tory austerity and demonising the unemployed?

All privatising the BBC would mean is a pro government propaganda channel with adverts instead of a pro government propaganda channel with a licence fee to avoid.

Fuck the BBC.

Nah. It'd also mean a pro-government channel with adverts following the money in preference to the news even more keenly than the commercial TV companies already do.
 
The BBC is brilliant overall. This is a fuck-up but I hope their reputation doesn't suffer too much.

I can't think of any other media organisation which would air its dirty laundry in public quite like this, where we have the slightly surreal situation of one of their flagship programmes digging the dirt on their other flagship programme.

Peter Rippon should've gone after the 'single mum' debacle so his departure is at least a silver lining to come out of this whole sorry affair.
this would be the same bbc that suppressed the newsnight report to defend the image of Jimmy Saville, knew the extent of the allegations yet continued to show tribute programmes, and a special jim'll fix it. and then when forced to acknowledge the truth when confronted by an ITV documentary attempted to defer any investigation into the affair for as long as possible.
or acompletly different one?
 
yeh, there's a lot of good programming on the bbc. but there's a lot of dross too. and as barney says, there's a great deal to be desired in the governance of the bbc.
 
All this at time when romney is threatning PBS in the states by taking away it's subsidy.The world would be a worse place without public service broadcasters
 
Back
Top Bottom