This either/or logic:what either/or logic. BBC should be criticised to the hilt for this fuck up AND it should be defended from privatisation etc.
articul8 said:So the anarcho-left is happy to let News Corp undermine the basis of public sector broadcasting? And this is a good idea because...?
The implication of this is that Fox News may as well take over from the BBC, as the Beeb has not been suffiently robust on the cuts.The unstated assumption behind a lot of the defence is that everyone else is an idiot who does whatever the tv says and the BBC says things that aren't as bad as fox news, so people wouldn't become like americans with the BBC. And this at a time when the BBC is facilitating US style welfare provisions, reduction in social support and so on.
freeloaderI've never paid the licence fee yet just like I won't pay for Sky or Virgin either.
freeloader
Somewhere on the whole internet a sillier post may have been made today. Can't say for certain, but it may have.So the anarcho-left is happy to let News Corp undermine the basis of public sector broadcasting? And this is a good idea because...?
More either/or logic. Why not imagine a BBC not run by an elite for an elite and padding it out with nonsense about public service? Why not BBC under democratic community control? Or maybe it really, is as your either/or logic dictates, - fox news or the current BBC.The implication of this is that Fox News may as well take over from the BBC, as the Beeb has not been suffiently robust on the cuts.
2 fine sentences, with a weasly, politician 'but does that mean' in the middle. Great stuff.what? I'm not defending what the BBC did - it was totally wrong - and the management which presided over the culture of silence should be for the chop. But does that mean we should be perfectly happy for the Murdochs to finally deliver the axe to national public broadcasting?
the management which presided over the culture of silence has already largely departed; that is, the people who were there while sir jimmy savile obe kcsg was there have probably all gone by now.what? I'm not defending what the BBC did - it was totally wrong - and the management which presided over the culture of silence should be for the chop. But does that mean we should be perfectly happy for the Murdochs to finally deliver the axe to national public broadcasting?
Good point. I just read he was knighted in 96, which was some time after there had been police investigations and some sort of 'official' BBC investigation into him. When there was also the wider swirl of rumours at the BBC, you do wonder what investigations the committee on honours (or whatever system it was in 96) did. Would assume there were at least police checks? Even pre Sohan, which highlighted the lack of evidence sharing when there was no conviction, you'd think it wasn't beyond the civil servants to ask some straightforward questions.incidentally, while we're hearing a lot about the bbc in all this, perhaps some bile should be saved for the honours system: i wonder how many nonces have been given obes and mbes and the like.
Can I move to have this stricken from the record? This was a bit ridiculousI'll cop to the smug accusation, but it's a love born out of true love, of something that matters and isn't just about having something to switch on after work.
what either/or logic. BBC should be criticised to the hilt for this fuck up...
What's this crap about BBC "independence"?
The same BBC which deliberately reversed its news footage of the sequence of events during the battle of Orgreave to make it look as though miners not police were responsible for starting the violence?
The same BBC which produced the disgraceful propagandist Panorama episode which justified the Israeli raid on the Gaza flotilla?
The same BBC which is cheering on Tory austerity and demonising the unemployed?
All privatising the BBC would mean is a pro government propaganda channel with adverts instead of a pro government propaganda channel with a licence fee to avoid.
Fuck the BBC.
2 fine sentences, with a weasly, politician 'but does that mean' in the middle. Great stuff.
Do you mean he's fully satisfied with his current post, has important work to do and supports the present leadership (but is installing phone lines as we speak)?articul8 has no ambitions to be a politican. He's told us himself!
this would be the same bbc that suppressed the newsnight report to defend the image of Jimmy Saville, knew the extent of the allegations yet continued to show tribute programmes, and a special jim'll fix it. and then when forced to acknowledge the truth when confronted by an ITV documentary attempted to defer any investigation into the affair for as long as possible.The BBC is brilliant overall. This is a fuck-up but I hope their reputation doesn't suffer too much.
I can't think of any other media organisation which would air its dirty laundry in public quite like this, where we have the slightly surreal situation of one of their flagship programmes digging the dirt on their other flagship programme.
Peter Rippon should've gone after the 'single mum' debacle so his departure is at least a silver lining to come out of this whole sorry affair.