Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Savile being used as a wedge issue to attack BBC independence

Sorry, but not playing ball with any more of your dishonest twisty shenanigans.

So, are you going to apologise to MrsM for your filthy outburst, or can I safely assume you really are as nasty, vindictive and as unpleasant as you're appearing of late?
Tbf I think what she said back was worse. I'm not even a fan of topcat!
 
I don't see anyone here calling for it to be abolished. It's not going to be anyway. But BBC executives getting defensive is not the right way to handle this.
I'll concede there's been no explicit calls for that, but there's been a lot of comments suggesting as much, or at least fundamental changes to its structure and financing that would render it a very different beast.

It is not perfect, far from it, but the way I see it the fact we can even have these conversations about it is why it's important - it is accountable in a way commercially-funded broadcasters simply aren't.
 
Tbf I think what she said back was worse. I'm not even a fan of topcat!
No, this wasn't about the heat of a discussion, this was about him calling MrsM a "spineless cunt" just because she closed a thread on the request of a poster.

It was a reasonable moderating decision and mods don't deserve to put up with this kind of abuse just because one mouthy poster doesn't agree with that decision.
 
Sorry, but not playing ball with any more of your dishonest twisty shenanigans.

So, are you going to apologise to MrsM for your filthy outburst, or can I safely assume you really are as nasty, vindictive and as unpleasant as you're appearing of late?
Hang on. Who called whom a creep here? That's out of order bringing that up imo. How about you telling me I had a 'nasty agenda' on the Savile thread? You going to apologise for that? Fuck's sake. I didn't want to mention this again, but you're way off on this. Way off.
 
Hang on. Who called whom a creep here? That's out of order bringing that up imo. How about you telling me I had a 'nasty agenda' on the Savile thread? You going to apologise for that? Fuck's sake. I didn't want to mention this again, but you're way off on this. Way off.
This was about a response to a moderating decision. Mods shouldn't have to put up with that kind of abuse, full stop.
 
No, this wasn't about the heat of a discussion, this was about him calling MrsM a "spineless cunt" just because she closed a thread on the request of a poster.

It was a reasonable moderating decision and mods don't deserve to put up with this kind of abuse just because one poster doesn't agree with that decision.
I am not going to let you provoke me into abuse giving you the excuse you are yearning for in order to ban me. It would avoid all sorts of awkward reminders of what you did eh?
You and Mrs M just stoop lower than even the most cynical person could imagine possible.
 
Why the FUCK are you bringing this up? If I report you for cross-thread abuse, will you do something about it?
Oh dear. It's like you've just completely forgotten what you just posted up in post #65. :facepalm:

Do you think mods should have to put up with this kind of abuse over a moderating decision?
 
ach. too cynical for me

Hardly cynicism. The Beeb was never the beacon of journalistic freedom that it's been painted as, but post-Gilligan it's been pretty much slavishly taking the government's part, and hoping that people won't notice all the craven bowing and scraping. They've spent the last several years reporting the various post-"credit crunch" attacks on the welfare state from a mostly "pro" perspective, with an occasional "anti" doco thrown in.
 
If it turns out that the BBC knew about large scale sexual abuse of children by BBC staff and "talent" then their needs to be a large scale removal of all who turned a blind eye.

I suspect that a goodly majority of 'em are already gone. Birt's "reform" of the Beeb saw off a lot of the middle and upper management who joined between the '60s and the '80s. That said, it'll make it harder for the Beeb to scapegoat individuals, or for the government to blame the actual institution.
I think there needs to be an independent public enquiry - not a "Hutton", but a properly-funded wide-ranging public enquiry.
 
Lol at this. I look forward to seeing the dude who works on Newsnight who told me, categorically, and somewhat patronisingly, that the decision to pull the programme was in no way linked with the planed Savile Christmas specials. 'Don't believe everything you read' he sneered.

Seeing him tomorrow night I think at a friend's do, should be fun :D
 
Attack it? Fine.

Call for it to be abolished? Short sighted.

Abolition would be bad. A public service broadcaster does at least leaven the commercial imperative of the independents, and we know from the various independent TV news "consolidations" over the years, that the commercial imperative can often mean poor news coverage, poor reportage and news programmes with too much "filler" content. I wouldn't like to see that being the case on every channel. The Beeb may be biased, but at least I know what their bias is, and it's not toward selling ad space.
 
Lol at this. I look forward to seeing the dude who works on Newsnight who told me, categorically, and somewhat patronisingly, that the decision to pull the programme was in no way linked with the planed Savile Christmas specials. 'Don't believe everything you read' he sneered.

Seeing him tomorrow night I think at a friend's do, should be fun :D

Repeat his sneer back to him, then wink. He'll probably have a stroke, if you're lucky. :D
 
Even before the coalition the BBC were evangelising about how cuts "needed" to happen and that it was like some piece of wisdom handed down by God and there could be no discussion whatsoever.
They would happily sell the NHS off and not mention it as long as they keep their own money and jobs.


Not defending the BBC particuarly after its appalling coverage of welfare/benefits issues, but thats not absolutely correct: they were planning a major series of programmes on the ''impacts of the cuts'' the Condem's applied massive pressure and the useless Thompson had a significant meeting with Cameron who waved the ''licence fee stick'' and caved in, no series and a definite shift in reporting of the cuts..
 
Best thing about the BBC is Newsnight*.... errr....
*joke
It's a simple reflection of 'star culture', seems to me. The BBC makes a sharp distinction between 'normal' staff and what it calls the 'talent'. The latter are not subject to pay scales or - it would seem - any censure by the BBC at all.

This will have to change, and not before time. Might even affect the ludicrous wages the BBC pays to the 'talent'. TBH I've long thought it was a disgrace that the state broadcaster paid its presenters millions of pounds a year. Suits the top executives, I suppose, who also pay themselves a small fortune.
THIS
Couldnt agree more on that. If it did this it would also get most of privatisers of their backs too...

anyhow I cant see that this will really be steered from an internal investigation with maybe one person getting the chop into any deeper structural changes, no matter how much braying there is in the press. There's just no correlation between the two things...is there?
 

How about a wrestle.....

wrestling1.jpg
 
If it turns out that the BBC knew about large scale sexual abuse of children by BBC staff and "talent" then their needs to be a large scale removal of all who turned a blind eye.

I suspect they've all retired or have dementia.
 
Back
Top Bottom