Yeah wasnt in a position to choose unfortunately. It's a learning opportunity though I think.
returning briefly to your earlier claim about All Men wanting 21 year auld women, you never answered my post where i pointed out you were conflating 'looks best' with 'wants' which is, to my mind, like apples and pears. yes, tbh in appearance there is a case to be made for young women looking particularly attractive to look at. they have, after all, no lines or wrinkles. but in substance someone who is 21 has vastly less life experience than someone of 25, 30, 40, 50. all the things which go to form the real basis for a relationship are only present in reduced quantity if one partner is, say, 21 and the other 40. seems to me you were saying that appearance only is what makes All Men want a woman: a bold claim. in addition, going further back to another point i find it rather strange that you appear to suggest polygynist cultures are more primitive than christian ones on the basis of no obvious evidence.
Common misconception about the game book. It's not a how to manual itself but a book about PUAs and the society that sprung up online in the early 00s. Yeah the author did become one himself but it's not a manual. It's actually worth a read just to show how creepy and socially odd some of these people are. It also signposts why some are attracted to it (lack of male role model, broken home etc).
yeh. but are you surprised?
this is what happens when an arts academic strays out of his comfort zone.
Not at all, I never said anything about 'primitiveness'. It's just that christianity, often via colonialism, appears to have had a lot to do with spreading the institution of monogamous one man one woman marriage all over the place, replacing other forms of social organisation, because in Christianity (apart from in Utah?) polygamy is a sin..
Yes, he is one beneficiary. But, also, there's other interests that are served by the deflection and splintering of people unsatisfied with the status quo.
Yeah, it looks worth a read. It's the other one that I'm dreading.
no, that sad bunch of data is about how people look not do you want to fuck
do you not see something wrong in saying 'this data which is appearance is also data about desire' when from what you've posted that isn't in fact the case?just taking two religions older than christianity, namely the roman religion and judaism, you don' see polygamy in either of them. but you don't seem familiar with the notion of something being implicit rather than explicit. why is that?
no, i didn't think you would be.
FFS he's an actual walking, talking rapist isn't he!? He's bragging about it too! Why the fuck is he still walking the streets? There is of course the full possibility it's all bullshit but even if it is he's still inciting rape.
