Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Roosh V, Pro-Rape Pick Up Artist, Announces Worldwide 'Tribal Meetings'

I suggest you fuck off dwyer, because for a start you can't seem to understand what the fucking problem is with telling women they're wrong about what they find attractive. You're telling women you know more about women than women know about women. You're telling women you know more about what gets them wet than they experience when they actually, you know, get wet.

I find that what people say they find sexually exciting is very often different from what they actually do find sexually exciting. I find this to be true of men and women alike.
 
I find that what people say they find sexually exciting is very often different from what they actually do find sexually exciting. I find this to be true of men and women alike.

In your wide experience of being present when men and women become sexually aroused.
 
i was trying to paraphrase Paw's "amongst women who have plenty of access to all sorts of sexual and romantic content (media, and the groups and communities that grow up around them) there were nothing but outspoken critics of the books/film and the type of dominance it was trying to sell. "

But surely you must accept that this attitude was not shared by the general public.

As you say, both the book and the film of Fifty Shades were remarkably successful, particularly among women.

I see no purchase in ignoring or denying that fact.
 
Well lets say the scenario of porn. Imagine a tv repairman or a plumber wanks to a porn movie about plumbers going round to fix a boiler and instead being fucked by a woman with huge tits who answers the door. I bet that if something like this looked as though it could happen during the course of their job (ie a scantly clad porn star looking woman answering the door when they came to fix the boiler) many men who found that fantasy a turn on would be a bit disturbed tbh.
 
I find that what people say they find sexually exciting is very often different from what they actually do find sexually exciting. I find this to be true of men and women alike.
Book recommendation:
"Dataclysm: Who We Are When We Think No one's Looking', by Christian Rudder, a mathematician who designed OkCupid, one of the world's most popular dating sites.
He has access to all the data about what people really want as opposed to what they say they want, and presents it well.
I'm only halfway through but it's good, if depressing. Possibly even better than your second sight. :p
 
I find that what people say they find sexually exciting is very often different from what they actually do find sexually exciting. I find this to be true of men and women alike.

Essentially Phil is going to use any example of female sexuality that, ahem, deviates from his preconceived notions as merely the exception that proves his rules.
 
But surely you must accept that this attitude was not shared by the general public.

As you say, both the book and the film of Fifty Shades were remarkably successful, particularly among women.

I see no purchase in ignoring or denying that fact.

News just in, bimble isn't a member of the general public.
 
Book recommendation!
"Dataclysm: Who We Are When We Think No one's Looking', by Christian Rudder, a mathematician who designed OkCupid, one of the world's most popular dating sites and has access to all the data about what people really want as opposed to what they say they want.
I'm only halfway through but it's good, if depressing. Possibly even better than your second sight. :p

I'll check it out, thanks.

I suspect (perhaps like Rudder) that the internet is rapidly making it impossible, or at least implausible, for either gender to continue deceiving themselves about the amoral nature of human sexuality.

In fact the idea that sexual attraction should be based on morality is a very recent assumption, it only arises with Romanticism. In my opinion feminists ought to celebrate its decline, since it has mainly been used to deny the true nature of female sexuality.
 
"Women prefer lesbian porn to other types. Everyone knows it's true. Except you"

<shudders>

This is to the very words EXACTLY the argument I've heard from loads and loads of men wanting to pressure me (and other women I talked to about it) into watching porn with them when I/we women didn't want to. Awww look luv, I even got you some of the lesbian stuff. just to show what a sensitive erotic maaaaan I am. not reassuring, dwyer. Not reassuring at all. <pukes>
 
Essentially Phil is going to use any example of female sexuality that, ahem, deviates from his preconceived notions as merely the exception that proves his rules.
Yep it works every time. That's why I tried not to bring up the fact that I've got quite a bad crush at the moment on the security man at my local co-op shop, because you know, I'm just an outlier, real women fancy Trump, etc. :facepalm:
 
Well lets say the scenario of porn. Imagine a tv repairman or a plumber wanks to a porn movie about plumbers going round to fix a boiler and instead being fucked by a woman with huge tits who answers the door. I bet that if something like this looked as though it could happen during the course of their job (ie a scantly clad porn star looking woman answering the door when they came to fix the boiler) many men who found that fantasy a turn on would be a bit disturbed tbh.

Oh sure. They'd run screaming for the hills. Definitely.
 
Yep it works every time. That's why I tried not to bring up the fact that I've got quite a bad crush at the moment on the security man at my local co-op shop, because you know, I'm just an outlier, real women fancy Trump, etc. :facepalm:

We've already ascertained that you're not actually a member of the general public, so it doesn't matter what you do or do not like, your views and desires simply should not be counted.
 
Many men not all men. Are you seriously saying that no tv repairman would be disturbed by it if one of their customers wanted to act out a porn scenario? That their reaction might be along the lines of what the hell is this crazy person doing?

Oh sure. They'd run screaming for the hills. Definitely.
 
"Women prefer lesbian porn to other types. Everyone knows it's true. Except you"

<shudders>

This is to the very words EXACTLY the argument I've heard from loads and loads of men wanting to pressure me (and other women I talked to about it) into watching porn with them when I/we women didn't want to. Awww look luv, I even got you some of the lesbian stuff. just to show what a sensitive erotic maaaaan I am. not reassuring, dwyer. Not reassuring at all. <pukes>

Who all think they're "nice guys."
 
I don't know what's worse, tbh. At least with roosh and his godawful types you can see their bile quite clearly and combat it head on. But someone like dwyer, with his paternalistic brand of patriarchy and control, trying to convince women that he knows them best, and that they should defer to his description of what their desires really are... that's more pernicious.

Stamp it out.
 
ding! ding! ding!

I think hetrosexual men do have a better idea about what heterosexual women in general find sexually attractive than individual heterosexual women do.

I also think that heterosexual women know more about heterosexual male sexuality in general than individual heterosexual men do.

Stands to reason as far as I can see.
 
Back
Top Bottom