Roosh V, Pro-Rape Pick Up Artist, Announces Worldwide 'Tribal Meetings'

[toggle]

and figleaf?

more pine needle size, i think

 

[frogwoman]

'But I'm such a nice guy, why won't you fuck me'

 

[frogwoman]

'Women in general'

 

[toggle]

I think hetrosexual men do have a better idea about what heterosexual women in general find sexually attractive than individual heterosexual women do.

I also think that heterosexual women know more about heterosexual male sexuality in general than individual heterosexual men do.

Stands to reason as far as I can see.

is this because hetrosexual women never complain about not getting good sex from those men who know them so well?

 

[Rebelda]

what he's doing is putting in an early bid for urban's mansplainer of the year

Sadly, it's already a hotly contested title

 

[Yuwipi Woman]

I think hetrosexual men do have a better idea about what heterosexual women in general find sexually attractive than individual heterosexual women do.

I also think that heterosexual women know more about heterosexual male sexuality in general than individual heterosexual men do.

Stands to reason as far as I can see.

This is so bizarre an assertion as to defy description.

 

[phildwyer]

'Women in general'

Seems to me that several people on this thread have a problem with generalization.

But there's nothing wrong with generalization, as long as it's acknowledged as such. It is actually possible to generalize without distortion. Many people seem to misunderstand generalization as normative, which it isn't.

If I say "women in general have two legs," that doesn't mean that all women have two legs, or that women ought to have two legs, or that you have two legs.

 

[toggle]

Sadly, it's already a hotly contested title

reckon the subject matter of this one has to make him a good contender

 

[Vintage Paw]

I think hetrosexual men do have a better idea about what heterosexual women in general find sexually attractive than individual heterosexual women do.

I also think that heterosexual women know more about heterosexual male sexuality in general than individual heterosexual men do.

Stands to reason as far as I can see.

 

[frogwoman]

But there are 3.5 billion women in the world. How can you talk about 'women in general'

 

[phildwyer]

'But I'm such a nice guy, why won't you fuck me'

That's exactly Roosh's attitude.

His outrage springs from the realization that women (in general) are not attracted to "nice guys." The "niceness" or otherwise of a man has little-to-no influence on whether women find him sexually attractive. Roosh and company find this a disgraceful state of affairs. Actually it seems to have driven some of them literally insane.

 

[Rebelda]

The problem is because you seem to think that men know more about women from their observations than woman do from, y'know, talking honestly to each other. Something we do when Men in General aren't listening. And if you have the gall to contest that then may I suggest that you go fuck yourself.

 

[phildwyer]

But there are 3.5 billion women in the world. How can you talk about 'women in general'

In the same way that one can speak of "men in general," or "people in general," or "penguins in general."

The fact that there are exceptions does not devalue the generalization, as you appear to believe.

 

[Vintage Paw]

The problem is because you seem to think that men know more about women from their observations than woman do from, y'know, talking honestly to each other. Something we do when Men in General aren't listening. And if you have the gall to contest that then may I suggest that you go fuck yourself.

Now come there, pretty lady. Don't go getting uppity and hysterical, like women do in general. Let the menfolk explain it to you sensibly and rationally.

 

[Vintage Paw]

You're a scourge, dwyer. Fuck off. Fuck off. Fuck off. Women here are telling you that your opinions about them are not welcome. Fuck off, dwyer. Fuck off.

 

[frogwoman]

In the same way that one can speak of "men in general," or "people in general," or "penguins in general."

The fact that there are exceptions does not devalue the generalization, as you appear to believe.

You cant speak of 'men in general' either although roosh and the like are trying.

 

[phildwyer]

The problem is because you seem to think that men know more about women from their observations than woman do from, y'know, talking honestly to each other. Something we do when Men in General aren't listening.

When evaluating the true opinions of anyone, about anything, I look at what they do not at what they say.

I suggest that everyone do likewise.

 

[pogofish]

Tbh Pornhub dividing its female visitors into preferences tells us nothing about whether 'women like lesbian porn'. It just tells us what the women that have visited Pornhub have watched.

I wonder how many of the "women" in those figures are actually guys like Roosh, using their mother's internet connection?

 

[Rebelda]

Now come there, pretty lady. Don't go getting uppity and hysterical, like women do in general. Let the menfolk explain it to you sensibly and rationally.

 

[phildwyer]

You cant speak of 'men in general' either

Yes you can. Why not?

 

[Vintage Paw]

When evaluating the true opinions of anyone, about anything, I look at what they do not at what they say.

I suggest that everyone do likewise.

Like, idk, looking at what women DO when they are amongst each other, feeling at ease, comfortable, and able to write down the things that they desire?

If only there were a place like that.

 

[Yuwipi Woman]

That's exactly Roosh's attitude.

His outrage springs from the realization that women (in general) are not attracted to "nice guys." The "niceness" or otherwise of a man has little-to-no influence on whether women find him sexually attractive. Roosh and company find this a disgraceful state of affairs. Actually it seems to have driven some of them literally insane.

You miss the point that men who consider themselves "nice guys" usually arn't. They are often incredibly clueless, self-centered dicks who think if they tell a woman "nice tits" then she should be "theirs."

 

[8den]

I think hetrosexual men do have a better idea about what heterosexual women in general find sexually attractive than individual heterosexual women do.

I also think that heterosexual women know more about heterosexual male sexuality in general than individual heterosexual men do.

Stands to reason as far as I can see.

 

[Rebelda]

When evaluating the true opinions of anyone, about anything, I look at what they do not at what they say.

I suggest that everyone do likewise.

Because women so famously behave more genuinely in the presence of men than they do with other women

 

[frogwoman]

How can talk about 3.5 billion women 'in general' when you have not met all of them. The average urban75 poster here is probably going to have vastly different views, definitions of attractiveness and life experiences to an young african woman living in a small rural village or an elderly woman living in an eastern european tower block somewhere

 

[phildwyer]

Like, idk, looking at what women DO when they are amongst each other, feeling at ease, comfortable, and able to write down the things that they desire?

Partly.

But also looking at what women (and men) do in public. Looking in particular at who women (and men) tend to date/ marry/ have sex with. That suggests a major disconnect, among both genders, between what they say and what they do.

 

[laptop]

If I weren't on the phone, I'd be posting a pic of a shovel here.

This'll have to do:

FUCK OFF DWYER

 

[frogwoman]

Partly.

But also looking at what women (and men) do in public. Looking in particular at who women (and men) tend to date/ marry/ have sex with. That suggests a major disconnect, among both genders, between what they say and what they do.

Most people do have sex though. The majority of people do have sex at least once in their lives so you cant talk about 'who has sex with who in general'

 

[Vintage Paw]

How can talk about 3.5 billion women 'in general' when you have not met all of them. The average urban75 poster here is probably going to have vastly different views, definitions of attractiveness and life experiences to an young african woman living in a small rural village or an elderly woman living in an eastern european tower block somewhere

Your first problem is that women on the internet don't count. They are not part of the general population. When they walk away from their computer screen they go *poof* and cease to exist.

 

[phildwyer]

How can talk about 3.5 billion women 'in general' when you have not met all of them.

By generalizing.

Honestly, it's alright to generalize. It doesn't mean you've got it wrong if there are exceptions. Thus one can say "in general, tigers are yellow-and-black" without implying that there are no white tigers.