Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Ritual slaughtering of animals stopped in Poland.

Before you reiterate your claim that nobody here really exists except you, don't. If you extend that logic to its conclusion, neither you (Falcon) nor the "you" speaking through Falcon exist either. *pop*

Eh? Is Falcon a solipsist or does he think that we are all bots?
 
I don't believe, on Urban75, that is generally the case. When DotCommunist uses "debate club" (an institution which enforces certain minimum standards of factual accuracy and logical consistency) as a pejorative term, (s)he may speaking for the majority. I also think in practice it goes beyond the mere exchange of opinion and gut reaction to the synthesis of demons to have a thoroughly satisfying shout at - intellectual masturbation, you might say.


I speak only for myself you pointy headed freak, but I do find it vastly amusing that you try to straightjacket everything into debate club rules in order to disguise your own failures as a human being. We're not far removed from youtube comment threads when talking on a forum. Perhaps you should try Oxford SU instead, I hear they've invited Le Pen, Assange and Galloway before so you'll be in company you'd like
 
<snip>You can't argue people out of moral conviction, or persuade them to have moral convictions when previously they didn't. You can't even persuade people that their moral convictions are incongruous or incoherent; we have a surprising capacity for cognitive dissonance.

Some of the time you can't, it doesn't mean that the attempt is never worth the effort.
 
Some of the time you can't, it doesn't mean that the attempt is never worth the effort.

The value in moral debate is probably that it enables one to have slightly clearer and more coherent opinions where previously one didn't have any. And that's only if it is nuanced debate about a specific circumstance, as opposed to a showy duel of fundamental principles. Mad old horse-cuddling Fred says something about morals being too important to leave to clumsy philosophers, and he's bang on - sopa operas and human interest news stories trade in moral dilemmas, and that's the genuine stuff of ethical calisthenics, rather than crude attempts to set out and defend universal principles.
 
I speak only for myself you pointy headed freak
The person you conflate me with in your affirmation of the consequent fallacy may well be a pointy headed freak. But, as a fallacy, that description of me follows neither logically nor, as it happens, in fact.
but I do find it vastly amusing that you try to straightjacket everything into debate club rules
Or, as we call it, adult conversation…
in order to disguise your own failures as a human being.
See "pointy headed freak, fallacy" above.
We're not far removed from youtube comment threads when talking on a forum.
So, not speaking only for yourself, then…
Perhaps you should try Oxford SU instead, I hear they've invited Le Pen, Assange and Galloway before so you'll be in company you'd like
NICE affirmation of the consequent fallacy. "Le Pen criticises Judaism. You critice Judaism. Therefore all of the things Le Pen thinks, you think". You trip your self up with each fallacious utterance. (And, by the way, submitting the thinking of Le Pen, Assange and Galloway to critical inspection is the very best way to expose its weaknesses. What would you propose - calling them "pointy headed freaks"?)

I'll let your insult of everyone here who feels they can distinguish their efforts from YouTube commentary stand on its own merit.
 
'fallacy, fallacy, fallacy!'

keep saying it Falcon, for such a skilled conductor its amazing how you have just that one note to call on
 
'fallacy, fallacy, fallacy!'

keep saying it Falcon, for such a skilled conductor its amazing how you have just that one note to call on
You serve 'em and I'll return 'em. Since you only express yourself in terms of fallacy, fail to argue on any points of fact or logic, rarely offer an opinion of your own, and are unable to distinguish between your opponent conceding a point and your opponent refusing to dignify your insults with further response, the number of notes I can call on is rather constrained by your limited discursive palette.
 
a whole post without latin, debate club terms or any other of your usual tics? amazing. Keep this up an you might eventually pass a voight-kampf

e2a oh I spoke too soon before your ninja edit. You do love those don't you?. Phallusy!
 
You serve 'em and I'll return 'em. Since you only express yourself in terms of fallacy, fail to argue on any points of fact or logic, rarely offer an opinion of your own, and are unable to distinguish between your opponent conceding a point and your opponent refusing to dignify your insults with further response, the number of notes I can call on is rather constrained by your limited discursive palette.
You say things that a massive wanker would say.
 
for such a keen mind you seem unable to use google, the onsite search function or your own no-doubt vast powers of research. Just like that time you couldn't find any evidence of jewish people condemning israel and then found yourself backed into a corner demanding that all jews apologise for israels actions loudly. You're a freak and not half so smart as you imagine yourself to be

I disagree.
He is about half as smart as he imagines himself to be. :)
 
cf.

It's like conducting an orchestra.:)

You're really not good enough to conduct, but it's interesting that your ego is such that you place yourself on the podium, baton in hand. I'm not a Freudian, or that might be cause for speculation...
 
I wonder what his IQ is.

bully-home.jpg
 
You're really not good enough to conduct, but it's interesting that your ego is such that you place yourself on the podium, baton in hand. I'm not a Freudian, or that might be cause for speculation...
Hilarious "speculation as a substitute for facts and logic or indeed anything of substance other than meta debate" contribution and - right on cue.
 
'fallacy, fallacy, fallacy!'

keep saying it Falcon, for such a skilled conductor its amazing how you have just that one note to call on


Fallacy or phallus-y, given his admission of "intellectual masturbation"?

Ah, I see he's now claiming he wasn't referring to himself.

Not very reflexive, is he?
 
I wonder if he's the kind of person who thinks it matters. :D
So one of you wonders what my IQ is, another wonders what my thoughts are on my IQ.

You'll excuse me for pointing out that you are sort of expected to be wondering what's going on in Poland. Worth giving that a shot, or is this more fun (my "intellectual masturbation" comment refers)?
 
Hilarious "speculation as a substitute for facts and logic or indeed anything of substance other than meta debate" contribution and - right on cue.

You know what I find hilarious?
The way you go back and edit your posts after they've been replied to, in order to make yourself look somewhat more masterful than you actually are.

Your original reply was "Hilarious and - right on cue", but obviously that didn't stroke your ego lasciviously enough.
 
Worth giving that a shot, or is this more fun?

mugging you off is fun yes, but I believe we have covered what various people think about the Polish situation- plenty of scope for more analysis I suppose. I'm torn on it, on the one hand I have worked first hand in slaughter and its horrific, but on the other is this motivated by animal welfare or bigotry?

I don't have answers there.
 
You know what I find hilarious?
The way you go back and edit your posts after they've been replied to, in order to make yourself look somewhat more masterful than you actually are. Your original reply was "Hilarious and - right on cue", but obviously that didn't stroke your ego lasciviously enough.
That's hilarious for you? There are a lot of folk blushing at the moment...

One of the problems I face, which you don't, is that I need to maintain the thread of a conversation with several people simultaneously, each often pursuing its own fallacy, and all capable of being quoted out of context weeks later.

So I make no apology for being careful about what I leave on the record, having been forced by necessity to respond quickly to several points at once. Deal with it.
 
Back
Top Bottom