I'll let you work out why this logically invalid.Well you reject the possibility of truth in this very post and your preceding ones in this thread as you argue there are no grounds whatsoever on which truth can legitimately be established.
I'll let you work out why this logically invalid.Well you reject the possibility of truth in this very post and your preceding ones in this thread as you argue there are no grounds whatsoever on which truth can legitimately be established.
Ah, Gilad, the anti-Semite (and no folks, I don't mean "anti-Zionist") Jew. Good musician with politics that are shittier than a pigsty floor.
You mean you won't make an argument supporting the logic of your own posts?I'll let you work out why this logically invalid.
Okay, I 'refute' that claim.You don't know what 'refute' means.
Is this a promise to do so or a claim that you have done so? If the former, looking forward to it, if the latter, where?Okay, I 'refute' that claim.
Not at all. How absurd!You seem to imagine that the implausibility of something is what establishes that it cannot be dismissed
Shit, you got me. ROFL, pity it was just on some petty bollocks.Is this a promise to do so or a claim that you have done so? If the former, looking forward to it, if the latter, where?
Okay, explain to me why I don't know what the word 'atheist' means?You don't know what the word 'refute' means in the English language. I can't be more plain.
How do you know he's not?Shit, you got me. ROFL, pity it was just on some petty bollocks.
Still think Descartes a woman?
I've made a claim based on your general behaviour and I will stand by it until I see evidence to the contrary.Okay, explain to me why I don't know what the word 'atheist' means?
I don't think you know what 'claim' means.I've made a claim based on your general behaviour and I will stand by it until I see evidence to the contrary.
You can choose completely, but then you'd be falling into a similar trap that 'atheists' fall into.
I'm not saying, btw, that because what is understood to be true is so mind-boggling that it makes something else mind boggling more likely - only that, in light of this, it's not unreasonable to have an inch of doubt.
Imagine sitting in a room with some cunt defending anti-semitism.That means so much, but I don't think some here would ever accept it. Butchersapron said some remark in the Icke thread to the effect of 'we're five steps ahead of you'.. but, of course, overlooked the words I've put in bold. Imagine sitting in an actual room with a group of people all verbally attacking you and insulting you at the same time. All I can say is... don't get so fucking chuffed.
Nice try, but no. Failed. Cognitive dissonance creates the motivation to achieve consonance. It is not an enabler of conflicting ideas, quite the reverse.Cognitive dissonance, going through that 'discomfort', would allow you to hold conflicting emotions, ideas, etc.
returned oh teacher!
well exactly, being "verbally attacked and insulted" only seems to matter to this lot when it's happening to them. That's why people get so annoyed at them - making out that if someone calls them a cunt it's worse than the titanic yet total denial/dismissal of the facts when there is actually evidence to show that they're talking shit and worse that there's consequences to the drivel they're spoutingImagine sitting in a room with some cunt defending anti-semitism.
Nice try, but no. Failed. Cognitive dissonance creates the motivation to achieve consonance. It is not an enabler of conflicting ideas, quite the reverse.
How do you know he's not?
Someone in the end 'genuinely' wished him to suffer.
That was me. I didn't really mean it - Gmart's an irritating, pompous little prick with delusions of adequacy but I wouldn't really wish him any harm. I really do hope that you get some kind of mutant strain of itchy scrote that kills you though. And just to prove it's not cowardice, I'd gladly suffer the same fate if I knew that you were doing so too.
You're worse than hitler.
Yeah but he wasn't really antisemitic, he wanted to get rid of the Jews cos they were ruining Germany both from within and from without. He didn't hate them because they were Jews. Just like Icke doesn't really mean Jews when he talks about Rothschild Zionism, the Jewage is incidental. Or something.
I am still struggling to work out how thinking the Jews were the cause of all Germany's problems is somehow not anti-Semitic.
you just need to open your mind man.
Yeah but he wasn't really antisemitic, he wanted to get rid of the Jews cos they were ruining Germany both from within and from without. He didn't hate them because they were Jews. Just like Icke doesn't really mean Jews when he talks about Rothschild Zionism, the Jewage is incidental. Or something.