Thora
Differently Ethical
Then your issue is with the government not some individual school/teacher.Yet the BMJ published the new advice last week. Then again the science wasn't listened to in the beginning.
Then your issue is with the government not some individual school/teacher.Yet the BMJ published the new advice last week. Then again the science wasn't listened to in the beginning.
Yet the BMJ published the new advice last week. Then again the science wasn't listened to in the beginning.
I can't find any overall consistent guidance given to schools. They've been left to react on the hoof. And seem to vary in their reactions. Not sure who makes decisions for each school. But if they've got any individual power to decide how they react ( which they must have ), I'd be more confident if they followed science. Waiting for govt advice has put them in a precarious position. Teaching staff and parents are being used as diagnostic tools.Then your issue is with the government not some individual school/teacher.
Seriously? You think busy teachers/schools (who are already working weekends and evenings as above) should ignore the guidance they get from the DfE, ignore the symptoms from the NHS, ignore the flowcharts the local authority and public health are sending them and read the BMJ to come up with their own guidanceI can't find any overall consistent guidance given to schools. They've been left to react on the hoof. And seem to vary in their reactions. Not sure who makes decisions for each school. But if they've got any individual power to decide how they react ( which they must have ), I'd be more confident if they followed science. Waiting for govt advice has put them in a precarious position. Teaching staff and parents are being used as diagnostic tools.
Possibly one member of staff to read the BMJ updates weekly relating to schools...would honestly take 15 minutes. If, as last week, new symptons were added, then put them in the school newsletter.Seriously? You think busy teachers/schools (who are already working weekends and evenings as above) should ignore the guidance they get from the DfE, ignore the symptoms from the NHS, ignore the flowcharts the local authority and public health are sending them and read the BMJ to come up with their own guidance
I can't find any overall consistent guidance given to schools. They've been left to react on the hoof. And seem to vary in their reactions. Not sure who makes decisions for each school. But if they've got any individual power to decide how they react ( which they must have ), I'd be more confident if they followed science. Waiting for govt advice has put them in a precarious position. Teaching staff and parents are being used as diagnostic tools.
Possibly one member of staff to read the BMJ updates weekly relating to schools...would honestly take 15 minutes. If, as last week, new symptons were added, then put them in the school newsletter.
It really wouldn't be a huge time consuming ,ongoing mess of changing advice. It'd just be letting parents/carers know what to look for from the start . There appears understandably to be confusion over what may or not be a symptom, which could lead to uninformed decisions. If the school doesn't think the BMJ published article is credible then they can ignore it .
Agree with all of that. I just think we are still at the raised temperature and continuous cough stage. I can't see the harm in letting people know it's changed.Afaik, guidance comes from la's and governors (what they have all been shovelling together while they've been trying to meet what is pretty much a legal obligation to open, with limited funding or guidance for that, throughout) but when you have a case, it's straight to PHE.
I KNOW my school has fuck all idea of what would happen even in the area I work- that is evolving- because they've had to be so focused on provision for learning, with no guidance, and then adapting the premises, with no proper budget for it.
I sound like I think the business management at my school is all great and I'm right behind them - I'm not - my workplace has been dreadful, for years, purely down to shit middle managers and a massive turnover in higher management, who come in and imagine they can turn it around and then realise they can't, cos there's no money, so make it more and more miserable for the rest of us while they try... but I do understand that THIS is different. No one has any fucking idea what they're doing now - and I'm not sure how much blame can be laid at any individual's feet there. Doesn't mean that I don't also agree that staff and parents and kids are being tested though. It's all pretty shit.
If you have schools going off piste with guidance you'll have challenge from parents, governors etc. It will take way more than 15 minutes a day responding to all that. It's so much simpler to tell parents to read the government guidance. Schools aren't medical experts and shouldn't be giving advice. At the end of the day it's up to parents how they respond to potential covid symptoms. If the school is telling them something different to what they see elsewhere that's going to be really confusing. Schools have to be trusted by parents, especially now.Possibly one member of staff to read the BMJ updates weekly relating to schools...would honestly take 15 minutes. If, as last week, new symptons were added, then put them in the school newsletter.
It really wouldn't be a huge time consuming ,ongoing mess of changing advice. It'd just be letting parents/carers know what to look for from the start . There appears understandably to be confusion over what may or not be a symptom, which could lead to uninformed decisions. If the school doesn't think the BMJ published article is credible then they can ignore it .
Agree with all of that. I just think we are still at the raised temperature and continuous cough stage. I can't see the harm in letting people know it's changed.
(testing access problems aside) can you even get a test for all the other symptoms or is it restricted to temp/cough/taste and or smell?
Because from what I see, you could remove your child but all the other parties aren't quarantined until a positive test. So what's the fucking point?
Can you imagine the push back from parents if schools start asking kids to isolate for sore throats, headaches and upset stomachs?
There's bound to be a serious undercount, not least because it's currently impossible to get a test in the 'hotspot' areas of Greater Manc, Lancs and Yorks.That's over 2.5% of schools with cases already.
That we know of.
Story here about a private contractor who just didn't turn up to do mobile testing (Bolton):It seems to have become impossible to get a test anywhere today.
883 schools today.
I suppose the key question is whether it is spreading in schools. Do we know that yet, particularly as the testing regime is currently omnifucked?
Yes this is a really important question. Is the situation in the schools just reflecting the population as a whole or is there active spread in schools?
At the start of the pandemic there were quite a few voices saying that children don't get the virus. More recently this has shifted to there being a very low chance of children passing the virus on. If the virus does spread among children the say way as it does adults then I really don't know where we go from here. Its vitally important for so many reasons for children to be able to attend school.
I suppose the key question is whether it is spreading in schools. Do we know that yet, particularly as the testing regime is currently omnifucked?