Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Re-opening Schools?

I was posting in response to the above. I support children being able to attend their schools. I am not a tory. What eton does shouldn't stop the state providing schools for children to attend.
I said I wasn't talking to any posters, only the topic.

But you're saying it's fine for rich children to stay off while state children go back?
:confused:
 
Lots of people who have never voted conservative think children should be able to go back to school and teachers should attend school to educate them.

Lol...
Lots of people of all and any political persuasion are thick as planks too.
 
I said I wasn't talking to any posters, only the topic.

But you're saying it's fine for rich children to stay off while state children go back?
:confused:

Rich children are the least likely to be harmed by missing some school.

But I’m mindful of what xenon was saying earlier. Maybe it’s not the right time.
 
Rich children are the least likely to be harmed by missing some school.

But I’m mindful of what xenon was saying earlier. Maybe it’s not the right time.
I'm mindful of what I said, opening the schools is an insane (and malicious) concept. It's based on malice.
 
Lots of people who have never voted conservative think children should be able to go back to school and teachers should attend school to educate them.

Everyone wants kids to be able to go back to school.
Teachers want to go back to schools to be able to do their jobs also.
It clearly isn't merely a case of teachers not attending school that is the issue here.
Nearly all the parents I know are not willing to send their kids back to school now. Some are keyw orkers but will pull their kids out now if others return before certain measures are in place.

Most teachers haven't stopped working, either whether at school or from home. None I know have had a break.

The minimising of their concerns, the concerns of parents etc is really shitty. I'm not convinced by this 'think of the children' argument in the slightest because it willfully ignores context which makes it shallow. as fuck.
 
Your reasoning?
a) Kids, grandkids, the concept of the behaviours required by these entities and their inability to conform to those vital requirements for a period of longer than 11 minutes.

b) The gambling with the lives of them, their families, the teachers, the teacher's families and anyone who has to be in contact with any of them.

c) Basically...we're in lockdown. There's no reasonable argument for breaking lockdown so early without any demonstrable examples to show the positives. There are none. And the rich kids aren't doing it.
 
a) Kids, grandkids, the concept of the behaviours required by these entities and their inability to conform to those vital requirements for a period of longer than 11 minutes.

b) The gambling with the lives of them, their families, the teachers, the teacher's families and anyone who has to be in contact with any of them.

c) Basically...we're in lockdown. There's no reasonable argument for breaking lockdown so early without any demonstrable examples to show the positives. There are none. And the rich kids aren't doing it.

I think it can be easy to ascribe malice where there is simple incompetence involved.

The Government have shown themselves to be a near infinite wellspring of incompetence.

They do have a track record of malice too, I’ll grant you.
 
You don’t think maybe people with knowledge of stuff like education should have any input?


I think the people who know most about pandemics should be the ones to make the ultimate decision regarding how safe it is to reopen schools.

And health and safety must be the first priority ... always
 
I think it can be easy to ascribe malice where there is simple incompetence involved.

The Government have shown themselves to be a near infinite wellspring of incompetence.

They do have a track record of malice too, I’ll grant you.
I've not been quick to ascribe it. However now being in that position, I find nothing from them to make reconsideration effective.
 
I think the people who know most about pandemics should be the ones to make the ultimate decision regarding how safe it is to reopen schools.

And health and safety must be the first priority ... always

The Government will find medics to take their party line if they so wish
 
And health and safety must be the first priority ... always
What if the rate of infection in the Uk just basically stays as it is right now for say two years though?
I just don’t know anymore, but a lot of faiths being put in there being a clear end in sight just not quite yet where I can’t see where that confidence is coming from really.
 
But I’m mindful of what xenon was saying earlier. Maybe it’s not the right time.

I keep feeling a bit baffled that this might be news to anyone - that the idea of opening schools soon, without waiting for real evidence, is just a no-brainer :confused: - but I am not working atm or wfh (canteen staff in a secondary school), so I will totally acknowledge that I have loads more time atm to be reading every, single thing that relates to it.

But I am still completely focused on the impact on the wider community - it's really fucking me off that the issues around schools are constantly framed, by the gov, as dismissing risks to children when there are risks to them, albeit minimal so far (re the Kawasaki/Toxic shock syndrome stuff) but where there are obvious potential risks that grow from transmission via kids, outwards, too, with no information being shared on that, despite unions repeatedly requesting that evidence.

We still don't have enough PPE provision for all NHS workers, ffs, let alone in care homes - and now they want to open schools? It's brainless - not because children are more precious - just because we are clearly not there yet, when every 'target' set is changed (because they have all failed).
 
Last edited:
I think, surprisingly, the decision to open schools is the first thing that has actually had a significant impact on support for the government.
Their response to the crisis has been so terrible but still the general population seemed to think the PM was doing a good job. Until now.
Ironically I'm sure they thought this move would meet with mass approval from parents desperate to get their children back to school. But whichever way you look at it, it's still only a few weeks of school for an unknown quantity of risk.
 
I think, surprisingly, the decision to open schools is the first thing that has actually had a significant impact on support for the government.
Their response to the crisis has been so terrible but still the general population seemed to think the PM was doing a good job. Until now.
Ironically I'm sure they thought this move would meet with mass approval from parents desperate to get their children back to school. But whichever way you look at it, it's still only a few weeks of school for an unknown quantity of risk.
I think there's huge animosity towards and distrust of this government. It's just not reported on.
 
]

I've heard similar from a parent.

Interesting comment from one parent. With all the social distancing within schools that is proposed it negates the learning process for development of children. Its possibly counterproductive:

We have taught our children to share, to play nicely, to comfort upset friends. What they will now be doing is the total opposite. This seems like more of a punishment for children who are all developing and learning.’
 
What if the rate of infection in the Uk just basically stays as it is right now for say two years though?
I just don’t know anymore, but a lot of faiths being put in there being a clear end in sight just not quite yet where I can’t see where that confidence is coming from really.
What's needed to get towards some kind of normality until a vaccine turns up (if a vaccine turns up) is a shit hot test-trace-isolate system.

All the talk of vulnerable children, the importance of schooling or whatever from the government and their supporters is just so much blather to distract from the simple fact that they've failed to sort out a test-trace-isolate system and it'll still be weeks before they've got one, working or otherwise.
 
Last edited:
I think, surprisingly, the decision to open schools is the first thing that has actually had a significant impact on support for the government.
Their response to the crisis has been so terrible but still the general population seemed to think the PM was doing a good job. Until now.
Ironically I'm sure they thought this move would meet with mass approval from parents desperate to get their children back to school. But whichever way you look at it, it's still only a few weeks of school for an unknown quantity of risk.

Well they've changed their language now, haven't they? The NHS were all great - with lots of evidence that they fucked it/it's workers. Embarrassing.

Feels to me like they have learnt from that and have gone right in on schools/teachers - 'duty' etc - no claps for teachers. Fuck all that - we're far enough into it that everyone has adjusted to it and we can go back to normal, focus on the £££'s and telling people off.
 
]

I've heard similar from a parent.

Interesting comment from one parent. With all the social distancing within schools that is proposed it negates the learning process for development of children. Its possibly counterproductive:
No social distancing has actually been proposed for young children though, has it? Is any country distancing under 7s in schools or nurseries?

My concern about the talk about how disturbing it will be for children to go to school or childcare with any form of extra hygiene measures or social distancing in place, is that it seems likely to me that things will not be all back to normal by September.
Are key workers damaging the development of their children by sending them to school and childcare now?
 
Back
Top Bottom