Who do you normally vote for?
Who do you normally vote for?
None of them, it only encourages them if you show interestWho do you normally vote for?
Fair enough.None of them, it only encourages them if you show interest
audience can be just as bad, quivering with a righteousness of question like this is yalta rather than a handful of crooks and hacks and bollocks. All the questions hit the beats of the journalistic cycle of this month except rarely. Dimbleby acts like he is the grand inquisitor. Load of sideshow bollocks. Blatant plants as well. CBA these days, I mean conrad fucking black? last days of...There should be more heckling and booing of, and less reasoning with, QT panelists and their ilk.
Politics isn't a debate it's a war.
Come on, it's Friday evening...you can do better than that!There should be more heckling and booing of, and less reasoning with, QT panelists and their ilk.
Politics isn't a debate it's a war.
Which is why you shouldn't watch it. Doing so says looks at our lovely politics, amn't we great?There should be more heckling and booing of, and less reasoning with, QT panelists and their ilk.
Politics isn't a debate it's a war.
Come on, it's Friday evening...you can do better than that!
Cuddly Ken - grand a time. Cuddly NF cuddly Ken.
Yeah, fuck all this poor MP nonsense. These people are my enemies.There should be more heckling and booing of, and less reasoning with, QT panelists and their ilk.
Politics isn't a debate it's a war.
Has to be after the bullshit-shed.Why is QT on so late?
Why couldn't it be on at 9pm for example?
Because it's tedious rubbish appealing to a minority of people and the BBC doesn't want it clogging up primetime.Why is QT on so late?
Why couldn't it be on at 9pm for example?
It's been a shitshow every week for as long as I can remember.I'm wondering if it's got significantly worse, or if I've just got more cynical. Seems to be the same fucking topic week after week, same faces, same answers. Goes nowhere.
It was supposed to be getting the axe in the late 2000s. Nick griffin saved it.
IDS countered saying the film portrays every bad scenario happening all at once to one person, that you don't have to submit only online and he was most upset that Jobcentre workers were poorly portrayed and that the majority want to help people.
Tbf he did say that they worked under a lot of pressure and constraints and had sanction targets to meet.That is the strategy Greg Hands used and fwis a lot of the audience agreed with him, Ken could have retaliated by mentioning how DWP staff are also treated badly the Govt and how many have been sacked.
but what would you have said?That is the strategy Greg Hands used and fwis a lot of the audience agreed with him, Ken could have retaliated by mentioning how DWP staff are also treated badly the Govt and how many have been sacked.