Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Prince Harry

I was (and still am) very anti the Iraq war(s), war is hideous and ugly in every respect. Morgan stirring the pot like that with fake pictures, he knew it would inflame tensions in the area, he knew the result would be more attacks, he didn't give a fuck, he wanted to sell papers, screw the lives of the British soldiers he put at risk, screw the lives of the enraged Iraqis who would attempt to harm coalition forces as payback and end up dead, fuck everything except making money, he's an odious cunt.
British soldiers taking part in an illegal invasion that resulted in the deaths of up to one million Iraqis probably put them at more risk of attack than Piers Morgan. Don't give him more credit than he's due.
 
Contempt for protocols is excellent behaviour in my point of view
Mine too, but probably not what the Royal Family as an institution would look for in a pprospective spouse for one of their members.

There is also an apparent contrast between Meghan and Kate in this regard, although perhaps the latter is equally contemptuous of protocols and just hides it better.

And there's some potential overlap, in some people's minds, between contempt for protocols and negative stereotypes of black behaviour.
 
Anyway, in the interests of journalism and free speech here's a video of Morgan falling off a Segway, breaking three ribs and puncturing a lung.

 
lots of great scoops have taken similar gambles and turned out to be real. at the end of the day there's a limited amount of checking that's really possible on stories like that, and the editor has to make a judgement call - he called it wrong, and lost his job. But there is literally no way he would have published unless he was convinced they were real.

All he had to do was show them to someone from the armed forces, either serving or recently retired, they would have known straight away. That is one of the core responsibilities of his job and he failed to do it because he was so keen for it to be real, to get the scoop and rake in the lucre that he failed to check.
 
Anyway, in the interests of journalism and free speech here's a video of Morgan falling off a Segway, breaking three ribs and puncturing a lung.


There’s also some great footage out there of him batting against cricketers, who really let him have it
 
All he had to do was show them to someone from the armed forces, either serving or recently retired, they would have known straight away. That is one of the core responsibilities of his job and he failed to do it because he was so keen for it to be real, to get the scoop and rake in the lucre that he failed to check.

Except we (well at least some of us) know or have known people in the armed forces who cannot and do not speak about things that they are aware of, I wouldn't view someone who was in the armed forces as likely or maybe able to give a truthful account of anything (and the people I have known who have been in that sort of situation of secrecy, it often weighs heavy on them - but they aren't going to start talking about it to anyone).
 
I was (and still am) very anti the Iraq war(s), war is hideous and ugly in every respect. Morgan stirring the pot like that with fake pictures, he knew it would inflame tensions in the area, he knew the result would be more attacks, he didn't give a fuck, he wanted to sell papers, screw the lives of the British soldiers he put at risk, screw the lives of the enraged Iraqis who would attempt to harm coalition forces as payback and end up dead, fuck everything except making money, he's an odious cunt.

His brother's a Colonel in the Army so I doubt his intention was to put soldiers at risk. He was against the war, I think it was as simple as that.
 
His brother's a Colonel in the Army so I doubt his intention was to put soldiers at risk. He was against the war, I think it was as simple as that.

Of course it wasn't his intention, he just didn't care. Editors have a responsibility to be accurate and truthful, news organisations are powerful and when in their haste to fulfil an agenda they fail to be accurate and truthful the consequences can be quite heavy. His bosses realised that, which is why they sacked him.
 
I tend to think of this when I see Morgan:

Piers Morgan, former Daily Mirror editor, used his wife's savings account to fund part of a £67,000 investment in computer company Viglen a day before the shares were tipped by the paper's City Slickers column, a court was told yesterday.

At 12.33pm on January 17, 2000, 6,884 Viglen shares worth £12,805.12 were bought through a personal equity plan in the name of his wife, Marion, defence barrister Philip Hackett QC told Southwark crown court. At 12.45pm he used his own Pep to buy a further 19,632 shares, worth £36,074.05. Then at 3.28pm Mr Morgan spent a further £18,275.25 on 10,000 shares, through brokers Kyte Securities.


He was cleared though so nothing wrong there oh no.
 
All he had to do was show them to someone from the armed forces, either serving or recently retired, they would have known straight away. That is one of the core responsibilities of his job and he failed to do it because he was so keen for it to be real, to get the scoop and rake in the lucre that he failed to check.
He fucked up and lost his job, yep. I doubt the process of checking was quite as straightforward as you'd like it to have been though.
 
Of course it wasn't his intention, he just didn't care. Editors have a responsibility to be accurate and truthful, news organisations are powerful and when in their haste to fulfil an agenda they fail to be accurate and truthful the consequences can be quite heavy. His bosses realised that, which is why they sacked him.

The Mirror campaigned forcefully against the war from the start - I agree it may have put UK soldiers lives at risk but personally I backed the publication of them given he was under the belief they were genuine. Regardless it turned out to be a good career move as after his sacking his broadcasting career began and whatever you think of him he's been pretty successful in that.
 
He fucked up and lost his job, yep. I doubt the process of checking was quite as straightforward as you'd like it to have been though.

Judging by the military bods on here who seem to be able to recognise camouflage patterns of uniforms of pretty much every military force in the world, I think they would be able to spot if the truck in Iraq where the abuse was photographed was of a type that hadn't been to Iraq. Anyway, bit of a derail, he's a cunt on many levels, including his attitude towards these royal twonks.
 
Other examples alongside Piers Morgan.
Nick Ferrari
Katie Hopkins
Iain Dale
almost everyone in Talk radio

The one that's on LBC before Ferrari, on his last legs by all accounts, but my lord, what a bag of bile and spite that man is.
 
Btw.....there is a difference with being 'curious' as to what a child may look like, in terms of features that include skin tone and being 'concerned' about it. The later is based in colourism and how value is attributed to 'Whiter' complexions.

'Concern' is colourism at work.

Curiousity isn't colourism and for those of us that come from multi-ethnic families genetics and how they manifest can be fascinating.
 
I don’t think that excuse is valid for wearing a fucking nazi uniform tbh but he’s also allowed to change and grow which he seems to have done.
Exactly- if we don't encourage people to apologise and learn from past mistakes then why should people bother to try and improve themselves?
 
Back
Top Bottom