Wow, we've never seen that before.Someone on twitter has just pointed out that it's pretty rich of Harry to rail against the 'racist' British media.
Wow, we've never seen that before.Someone on twitter has just pointed out that it's pretty rich of Harry to rail against the 'racist' British media.
I think in this case it's because you don't want to confront the endemic racism in society so you keep demanding more and more explanations until you can find some excuse to dismiss it all.Is that a problem?
It never ceases to amaze me what thoroughly insightful comment can be found on Twitter.Someone on twitter has just pointed out that it's pretty rich of Harry to rail against the 'racist' British media.
I think in this case it's because you don't want to confront the endemic racism in society so you keep demanding more and more explanations until you can find some excuse to dismiss it all.
He was a kid ffs.Someone on twitter has just pointed out that it's pretty rich of Harry to rail against the 'racist' British media.
You never, I bet you got drunk in a park and acted like a twat like the rest of usI know. I invaded czeckoslovakia when i was 15 and drunk
He was a kid ffs.
Because it is such a serious allegation, probably.
So...?
There is no other evidence (nor would you expect there to be of a private family discussion). So, based on what we do have i.e. Harry saying it happened (and nobody denyng it), do you think it more likely to have happened or not? Essentially, is it more likely that he made the whole thing up, or that (at least some of) the royal family behaved in a racist way with regard to her?
Morgan is performance art.he is many things but not thick
Putting aside the swasticas, is that racist in an intentional way though? I do understand that it is racist in the sense of perpetuating colourism (which I think is the right term, or at least the term used in the guardian yesterday), and racism at a structural level. It has a weight of history and implied judgement behind it. But it’s also just crass. Insensitive. Ignorant. But it’s the kind of thing my in laws would say. Without knowing better. Ooh I wonder what colour the baby will be.Sasaferrato did you have a chance to think about the questions below? Because it seems to me that you've tacitly accepted that Harry, Megan, and the (then unborn) kid were on the receiving end of racism by a royal. I just wonder whether that made you examine your knee-jerk dismissal of racism as a factor in all this, at the outset. Specifically, whether you think there might have been an element of unconscious bias on your part? That's not necessarily a big deal; I'm sure we all do to a greater or lesser extent. But, it'd be a failing not address it when you do become conscious of it.
For what it's worth, I'm the same age as Harry, and also have a mixed race wife with a public profile who experiences regular racism, starting with her own family many years ago to social media now.Anyone who has done anything slightly dodgy in their distant past is not allowed to complain about racism against their wife now. Sorry, that's just the rules.
I have brown kids. If my parents (who are white) made comments like that they likely would not have a relationship with them or me.Putting aside the swasticas, is that racist in an intentional way though? I do understand that it is racist in the sense of perpetuating colourism (which I think is the right term, or at least the term used in the guardian yesterday), and racism at a structural level. It has a weight of history and implied judgement behind it. But it’s also just crass. Insensitive. Ignorant. But it’s the kind of thing my in laws would say. Without knowing better. Ooh I wonder what colour the baby will be.
So?I have brown kids. If my parents (who are white) made comments like that they likely would not have a relationship with them or me.
It’s racist shit.
I disagree with that I think. I think there’s space for a genuine question and interest as to what a mixed race child might look like. That’s probably quite normal actually. What’s important is how it was said and why, in what context. The fact that H&M have mentioned it points to the fact that they thought it was racist, so it pretty much certainly was.No-one. No-one at all who has ANY social awareness would ask how brown a baby is likely to be. Or care about it like it made a difference! If any of you think that is a normal question then you seriously need to take a long hard look at yourselves. And age/generation is no fucking excuse, it is never too late for people to educate themselves.
For what it's worth, I'm the same age as Harry, and also have a mixed race wife with a public profile who experiences regular racism, starting with her own family many years ago to social media now.
I find it utterly chilling the metal gymnastics some are going through to deny her or her husband's right to complain about racism. As if she somehow deserves it, or has no right to complain about any of it.
I've probably (and shamefully) done or said various dodgy things as a teenager or student, who thought I was right-on and above reproach. The thought that any of that could be used against me or my wife is pretty depressing all told.
Putting aside the swasticas, is that racist in an intentional way though? I do understand that it is racist in the sense of perpetuating colourism (which I think is the right term, or at least the term used in the guardian yesterday), and racism at a structural level. It has a weight of history and implied judgement behind it. But it’s also just crass. Insensitive. Ignorant. But it’s the kind of thing my in laws would say. Without knowing better. Ooh I wonder what colour the baby will be.
As another parallel. My mum saw a picture of this collage my lad had made out of comics. It had some semi naked women on it. She laughed and said ‘at least we know he’s normal’. And it’s like no Mum you can’t say that shit any more, there’s nothing wrong with being gay’. And she’s like ‘of course not, X and his boyfriend live in the house on the next road etc etc
AbsolutelyYeah. But, to my mind there's a big difference between unthinking (almost generational) racism, and failing to reflect when you're pulled up on it.
It is. Hair colour and type is usually a more interesting subject though.I disagree with that I think. I think there’s space for a genuine question and interest as to what a mixed race child might look like. That’s probably quite normal actually
It is. Hair colour and type is usually a more interesting subject though.
I disagree with that I think. I think there’s space for a genuine question and interest as to what a mixed race child might look like. That’s probably quite normal actually. What’s important is how it was said and why, in what context. The fact that H&M have mentioned it points to the fact that they thought it was racist, so it pretty much certainly was.
Exactly right.I disagree with that I think. I think there’s space for a genuine question and interest as to what a mixed race child might look like. That’s probably quite normal actually. What’s important is how it was said and why, in what context. The fact that H&M have mentioned it points to the fact that they thought it was racist, so it pretty much certainly was.
He was a massive embarrassment for the swastica thing and deserved a slap round the head and some serious education about 20th century history and his family’s part in it. But to bring it up 20 years later when the guy has quite clearly fucking learnt from it is the mark of a twat.This assumes that we live in a post-racism world though, where there is no weight or value given to such a comment and it is purely a descriptor along the lines of "do you think she'll have eyes that look like yours or mine?" But we don't live in the world where that can be used purely descriptively. I know some folks here inexplicably love the royals, I guess every online community has its eccentrics... but defending the bunch of fuckwits that are the royal family and suggesting they couldn't possibly be racist or make a racist comment is just really quite bonkers tbh. I can't really put it any other way.
And defending someone wearing a nazi uniform and a swastika to go to a party - yes he may have been young, but even if he was thick as pigshit himself, if his family had any nouse they'd have told him not to go out like that. Apparently every move they make is monitored and regulated, apart from that one? No.