What more could you possibly need to know?!I don’t like him at all but I've got to admit I'm quite curious
He didn't write it.He didn't write the book as a former soldier, he wrote it as a member of the royal family, so we're back to his and his advisors motivations for including it. And let's face it, it's about a paragraph. Hardly a detailed commentary on the inhumaity of war.
He didn't write it.
Please just steal it from a library so we don’t have to see it on our shelves.just get it out of the library if you're actually interested enough to read it
He kind of did. It’s written collaboratively with a ghost writer as many celeb memoirs areHe didn't write it.
A pro monarchy mate of mine was saying that the Royals have massive soft power in terms of Britain's image in the world, and that eg if the British government asked North Korea if they wanted King Charles to visit they'd say yes without a doubt?
I'm really not sure about that though and I'm even less convinced that that's actually good
that's probably true, they're both dynastic rulers of tin-pot countries, expect they have a lot in common.A pro monarchy mate of mine was saying that the Royals have massive soft power and that eg if the British government asked North Korea if they wanted King Charles to visit they'd say yes without a doubt?
I'm really not sure about that though
Hopefully Charles won't get any ideasthat's probably true, they're both dynastic rulers of tin-pot countries, expect they have a lot in common.
Hmmm. The icy reception received on the recent Caribbean trip rather shows that up for what it is. Not sure any country gives much of a shit about a visit from a British royal nowadays tbh.A pro monarchy mate of mine was saying that the Royals have massive soft power in terms of Britain's image in the world, and that eg if the British government asked North Korea if they wanted King Charles to visit they'd say yes without a doubt?
I'm really not sure about that though and I'm even less convinced that that's actually good
Yeah that's what I thought?Hmmm. The icy reception received on the recent Caribbean trip rather shows that up for what it is. Not sure any country gives much of a shit about a visit from a British royal nowadays tbh.
Yes, she was popular for some reason. The rest of them, not so much. The sons of the extremely popular Diana were probably next best for popularity. Not any more.I assumed that the respect and image part around the world was due to the late EII rather than the whole family.
Yeah people generally liked her or at least respected her, I don’t think they have a great view of Charles.I assumed that the respect and image part around the world was due to the late EII rather than the whole family.
I think she was popular because she behaved in a way that fitted the perceptions of many people as to how a Queen should behave. I'm not a royalist, this is just my perception. To many people, she gave the impression of being dignified, polite, and stately. I can't say that any of the ones that are left particularly do that.Yes, she was popular for some reason. The rest of them, not so much. The sons of the extremely popular Diana were probably next best for popularity. Not any more.
I'm waiting for the Taschen extra large one that overlaps the actual coffee table.How big is this book? The dimensions? Reason I ask, is that some people might be buying it to put on a coffee table to start conversations and the like. That'd be an utter fail, can you imagine a monstrously large photo of the spare looking at you every time you sat down with a cuppa. Eek.
He's always going to be known as THE Spare now, isn't he? Even though history has been littered with them.
Yes, and as said above, she was wise enough to say almost nothing. That allowed people to project onto her their own image of what she was like. At the big Stop the War shuffle of 2003, there were people handing out leaflets asking us to 'tell the Queen to stop the war', which seemed a bizarre thing to hope for to me at the time. But they were projecting themselves onto her. It was a common thing for people to do.I think she was popular because she behaved in a way that fitted the perceptions of many people as to how a Queen should behave. I'm not a royalist, this is just my perception. To many people, she gave the impression of being dignified, polite, and stately. I can't say that any of the ones that are left particularly do that.
I think she was popular because she behaved in a way that fitted the perceptions of many people as to how a Queen should behave. I'm not a royalist, this is just my perception. To many people, she gave the impression of being dignified, polite, and stately. I can't say that any of the ones that are left particularly do that.
If they sent William he could get tips on having your embarrassing brother knocked off.A pro monarchy mate of mine was saying that the Royals have massive soft power in terms of Britain's image in the world, and that eg if the British government asked North Korea if they wanted King Charles to visit they'd almost certainly say yes?
I'm really not sure about that though and I'm even less convinced that that's actually good I've got a lot of respect for him and find his pov interesting (it's probably the one thing I really disagree with him on) but this kinda seems like clutching at straws tbh