Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Prince Harry

I've no idea. I don't expect she'd care. It was a party with hundreds of other posh & famous people there too.

If she had to avoid ever sharing a room with anyone who's been rude about her stepson she'd probably not be able to go to parties anymore
Wasn't Clarkson the guy who wanted to throw shit at Meghan Markle? And Piers derests her.

The royals know exactly who will be at any actual organised event and I seriously doubt she didnt realise those two pigs would be there.
Having said that she probably detests Markle as much as those two misogynistic pigs.
 
I'm sorry I don't believe he killed 25 people in Afghanistan lol, it's not impossible but people who do that sort of stuff don't tend to write tell all books about it
He forgets that he was not in isolation... I speak to people who were there when he was there. He didn't go anywhere where there was a chance he could be captured, ie, not facing the enemy. He was regarded as an utter liability, his presence made others unsafe.
 
He forgets that he was not in isolation... I speak to people who were there when he was there. He didn't go anywhere where there was a chance he could be captured, ie, not facing the enemy. He was regarded as an utter liability, his presence made others unsafe.
Yeah I thought he wouldn't have been allowed to see active combat due to his status?
 
He forgets that he was not in isolation... I speak to people who were there when he was there. He didn't go anywhere where there was a chance he could be captured, ie, not facing the enemy. He was regarded as an utter liability, his presence made others unsafe.

Here is what he actually wrote.

Prince Harry killed 25 people in Afghanistan - and says he was 'not ashamed of it'​

Prince Harry writes in his memoir that he killed 25 people while serving in Afghanistan.
The Duke of Sussex spent 10 years in the army, including two frontline tours to Afghanistan.
In Spare, he writes: "Most soldiers don't know exactly how many kills they have to their credit.
"Under battle conditions, you often fire indiscriminately.
"However, in the age of Apaches and laptops, everything I did in the course of two tours of duty was recorded and time-stamped.
"I could always tell exactly how many enemy combatants I had killed. And it seemed essential for me not to be afraid of that figure. Among the many things I learned in the Armed Forces, one of the most important was to be accountable for my own actions."
He continues: "So my number: twenty-five. It was not something that filled me with satisfaction, but I was not ashamed either.
"Naturally, I would have preferred not to have that figure on my military resume, or in my head, but I would also have preferred to live in a world without the Taliban, a world without war.
"However, even for a casual practitioner of wishful thinking like myself, there are realities that cannot be changed."
 
Wasn't Clarkson the guy who wanted to throw shit at Meghan Markle? And Piers derests her.

The royals know exactly who will be at any actual organised event and I seriously doubt she didnt realise those two pigs would be there.
Having said that she probably detests Markle as much as those two misogynistic pigs.
Considering how obsessed the british media has been with Harry 'n' Meg for the past decade, it's very unlikely you'd be able to go to any party of rich and famous people in britain without there being at least a couple of people who've been rude about them for money present. It's a national pastime.
 
Considering how obsessed the british media has been with Harry 'n' Meg for the past decade, it's very unlikely you'd be able to go to any party of rich and famous people in britain without there being at least a couple of people who've been rude about them for money present. It's a national pastime.

Sad indictment of the people then... considering the death threats to Meghan...

Eta.


It was actually Camillas lunch and Morgan and Clarkson were invited.
 
Last edited:
I was quite surprised that he has actually revealed how many people he killed. I mean, he actually killed people. I don't know why, but I'm shocked by both the fact and the revelation... If he manage to count, does that mean he shot them at close range? Is this an accurate number or a guess? Either way, yeah, it makes me feel sick.

No...he flew a helicopter and every action was recorded. That's what he wrote in the book..
 
It doesn’t seem to have affected him though? He says they were 'pieces on a chessboard that need to be removed' :eek:

That's why I thought it was very 'I was in the SAS you know!'
i''m sure there are people who think like that - I can even imagine thinking like that myself - esp if you're just firing from afar with a massive gun that just requires you to squeeze a trigger at targets like in a computer game and you can't see their faces properly.
 
I am astonished no-one has suggested that Andrew could well be the father. Andrew and Diana were both renowned for their horizontal (or otherwise) activities and it would have been remarkable if someone with Andrew's roving eye had not taken taken advantage as his generation's "spare" of the then "heir"'s newly-wedded but reportedly-unsatisfied bride.

It was 1984 - barely 20 years after the first beginning of the sprouts of the heady sixties which led to the summer of love - and as the clock counted down to 1988, that amazing year of ecstasy fueled abandon - when Prince Harry was birthed from Diana. The progeny of a young stallion and the almost virgin bride. "Andrew, but Andrew", she had cried, to only have the princess of hearts heart broken as the Naval Commander forsook her for, as he explained (and as he had had to (and would have to) explain to so many), his experience in the Falklands had permanently affected his ability to profusiate.

What joy it would give Andrew so many years later to observe his secret child continue in his footsteps with similarly heroic deeds on the battlefields afar...If only others could know...
 
i''m sure there are people who think like that - I can even imagine thinking like that myself - esp if you're just firing from afar with a massive gun that just requires you to squeeze a trigger at targets like in a computer game and you can't see their faces properly.
So either he is a psychopath or he made the whole thing up
 
So either he is a psychopath or he made the whole thing up
no he's just a soldier - unless all soldiers are psychopaths - if you have to kill people for a living, I suppose being a psychopath helps, but also being a repressed member of the ruling classes also helps here.
 

Keep it comin Harold.. all good stuff

'She treated me like a young stallion': Prince Harry recounts losing his virginity to an older woman in a FIELD behind a pub at the age of 17 in his bombshell biography​

 
I am astonished no-one has suggested that Andrew could well be the father. Andrew and Diana were both renowned for their horizontal (or otherwise) activities and it would have been remarkable if someone with Andrew's roving eye had not taken taken advantage as his generation's "spare" of the then "heir"'s newly-wedded but reportedly-unsatisfied bride.

It was 1984 - barely 20 years after the first beginning of the sprouts of the heady sixties which led to the summer of love - and as the clock counted down to 1988, that amazing year of ecstasy fueled abandon - when Prince Harry was birthed from Diana. The progeny of a young stallion and the almost virgin bride. "Andrew, but Andrew", she had cried, to only have the princess of hearts heart broken as the Naval Commander forsook her for, as he explained (and as he had had to (and would have to) explain to so many), his experience in the Falklands had permanently affected his ability to profusiate.

What joy it would give Andrew so many years later to observe his secret child continue in his footsteps with similarly heroic deeds on the battlefields afar...If only others could know...
I never paid any attention to Diana’s going-ons when she was alive, but ‘her horizontal activities’ would have been notorious only in the eyes of the misogynist tabloid press. She was in a miserable marriage and cheated on by her husband, so I can’t fault her for seeking affection elsewhere.

I actually remember the press keeping tabs on the number of men she was thought to have had relations with since things went south with Charles, In particular a cartoon in the Scum when a fifth alleged lover had been revealed, depicting her making a fifth notch mark on her bed’s wooden post. Because a woman having five sexual partners in eleven years clearly makes her a slut.
 
I never paid any attention to Diana’s going-ons when she was alive, but ‘her horizontal activities’ would have been notorious only in the eyes of the misogynist tabloid press. She was in a miserable marriage and cheated on by her husband, so I can’t fault her for seeking affection elsewhere.

I actually remember the press keeping tabs on the number of men she was thought to have had relations with since things went south with Charles, In particular a cartoon in the Scum when a fifth alleged lover had been revealed, depicting her making a fifth notch mark on her bed’s wooden post. Because a woman having five sexual partners in eleven years clearly makes her a slut.
What I remember most from Diana's death is her going from slut to saint between the first and second editions of the Mirror.
 
Back
Top Bottom