Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Prince Andrew, Duke of York, named in underage 'sex slave' lawsuit

Why the fuck isn’t he being interviewed under police caution? He’s being allowed to get away with this- it’s corrupt

Being sleazy arrogantand overprivileged are not crimes. He has been accused of having sex with a seventeen year old, which is not a crime in the UK, even though it may be in the jurisdiction in which he is alleged to have done it. Remember the rather weasley denial the Palace made on his behalf: “Any suggestion of impropriety with underage minors is categorically untrue." Not all "minors", in the UK at least, are under the age of consent; that's the difference between being under 16 and under 18. A point made clear in the case in the media today of the headteacher who was sacked got having sex with two seventeen year olds and has been awarded £700,000 for unlawful dismissal.

A primary school headteacher sacked after having sex with two 17-year-old boys he met through a gay dating app has been awarded nearly £700,000 compensation by a tribunal.


Head who had sex with two teenage boys he met on Grindr wins £700k at tribunal

The Princeling also stayed in the house of a convicted paedophile who had served his absurdly lenient sentence, that's clearly not a crime, either.
 
Being sleazy arrogantand overprivileged are not crimes. He has been accused of having sex with a seventeen year old, which is not a crime in the UK, even though it may be in the jurisdiction in which he is alleged to have done it. Remember the rather weasley denial the Palace made on his behalf: “Any suggestion of impropriety with underage minors is categorically untrue." Not all "minors", in the UK at least, are under the age of consent; that's the difference between being under 16 and under 18. A point made clear in the case in the media today of the headteacher who was sacked got having sex with two seventeen year olds and has been awarded £700,000 for unlawful dismissal.




Head who had sex with two teenage boys he met on Grindr wins £700k at tribunal

The Princeling also stayed in the house of a convicted paedophile who had served his absurdly lenient sentence, that's clearly not a crime, either.
Which is why the police interview someone. If you are an associate of a child abuser, there are accusations about you, you are involved in a paedophile ring, they investigate and interview, surely?
 
Being sleazy arrogantand overprivileged are not crimes. He has been accused of having sex with a seventeen year old, which is not a crime in the UK, even though it may be in the jurisdiction in which he is alleged to have done it...
Flight records show her being brought to the UK multiple times and that famous picture with Andy is apparently in Ghisaine Maxwell's flat in London.

e2a and of course her age doesn't matter if she's being sex-trafficked.
 
And don't forget, it was convenient. Who among us can truly say we haven't gone out of our way to stay at the mansion of a convicted abuser when it was convenient?
Convenience is the key word here. Most honourable men when faced with finding somewhere to stay in New York wouldn't be arsed feckin' around on Tripadviser. So much easier to go to Pedomansions owned by a convicted Pedo. Ditto flights to Pedoisland. Who amongst us wouldn't hop aboard a Pedoflight, in a plane owned by ...
 
In terms of legal action, the UK police could presumably only interview him about sex with/rape of* the woman in London. Or possibly sex tourism legislation for the nonce island stuff? Otherwise it's up to US authorities calling on him as a witness.

* Let's add the word 'alleged', but that is what it would be if she was trafficked?
 
Convenience is the key word here. Most honourable men when faced with finding somewhere to stay in New York wouldn't be arsed feckin' around on Tripadviser. So much easier to go to Pedomansions owned by a convicted Pedo. Ditto flights to Pedoisland. Who amongst us wouldn't hop aboard a Pedoflight, in a plane owned by ...
BAAAHHAHAHAHA
 
Being sleazy arrogantand overprivileged are not crimes. He has been accused of having sex with a seventeen year old, which is not a crime in the UK, even though it may be in the jurisdiction in which he is alleged to have done it. Remember the rather weasley denial the Palace made on his behalf: “Any suggestion of impropriety with underage minors is categorically untrue." Not all "minors", in the UK at least, are under the age of consent; that's the difference between being under 16 and under 18. A point made clear in the case in the media today of the headteacher who was sacked got having sex with two seventeen year olds and has been awarded £700,000 for unlawful dismissal.




Head who had sex with two teenage boys he met on Grindr wins £700k at tribunal

The Princeling also stayed in the house of a convicted paedophile who had served his absurdly lenient sentence, that's clearly not a crime, either.
Who would a nonce invite round and for what malign pursuits?
 
In terms of legal action, the UK police could presumably only interview him about sex with/rape of* the woman in London. Or possibly sex tourism legislation for the nonce island stuff? Otherwise it's up to US authorities calling on him as a witness.

* Let's add the word 'alleged', but that is what it would be if she was trafficked?
Call it what it is, rape.
 
Not sure if I can stomach watching the full programme, but it will be interesting to see the context of his 'honourable thing to do' claim. One reading of the phrase is that he had a lingering loyalty to Epstein, but presumably he's using it in the sense of 'I went over there to tell him what I thought and that our relationship was over'. But that line isn't going to work as, from memory, the walk in the park wasn't their final meeting in 2010.

I think it's a fair guess that, justice wise, this goes absolutely nowhere and he just ends up a semi retired royal, grubbing out corrupt money wherever he can. Same time, 'friends of Andrew' were playing up his 'playboy image' and that he's had over a 100 relationships (as part of the PR battle a few weeks ago). Not impossible that a number of these 'relationships' were, shall we say, arranged for him by various hosts. There may be more to come.

Realise it's not exactly fair to extrapolate from one set of allegations that there may be more to come. But it feels like a necessary corrective in the case of the royals. In part, the media report their every move, whilst sticking other stuff in the safe. There's still a pact between royals and press.
 
Dershowitz was on radio this morning saying he was the real victim of false accusations and he was proud of keeping Epstein out of jail, job well done. Said he went round to Epstein's for massage by professional massage therapists who were all age 40-50. Said he brought his wife with him.
He's a real shit, Dershowitz
 
Back
Top Bottom