Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Prince Andrew, Duke of York, named in underage 'sex slave' lawsuit

Given that the girl involved was 17, and the age of consent in the UK is 16 his statement that he didn't have sex with an underage girl is, in the very strictest sense, true. It doesn't in any way excuse his behaviour nor should it clear him of any wrongdoing. It also doesn't clear him of associating with a convicted pedophile nor any one of his other crimes.
 
Given that the girl involved was 17, and the age of consent in the UK is 16 his statement that he didn't have sex with an underage girl is, in the very strictest sense, true. It doesn't in any way excuse his behaviour nor should it clear him of any wrongdoing. It also doesn't clear him of associating with a convicted pedophile nor any one of his other crimes.
His paedo friend
 
A Buckingham Palace statement said: "The Duke of York has been appalled by the recent reports of Jeffrey Epstein's alleged crimes. His Royal Highness deplores the exploitation of any human being and the suggestion he would condone, participate in or encourage any such behaviour is abhorrent."
It would be newsworthy if HRH wasn't appalled and would condone etc etc so it's not entirely, innocently clear why Buck House sees the need to state the obvious.
:eek:
(But of course it is.)
 
Last edited:
Perhaps Prince Andrew could go around flying a helicopter or something and helicopter might just accidentally go all wrong. Oh dear! Andrew seems to be deadybones. How dreadfully sad.

Or he might go ski-ing in Verbier and just sort of trip up and fall down.
 
Perhaps Prince Andrew could go around flying a helicopter or something and helicopter might just accidentally go all wrong. Oh dear! Andrew seems to be deadybones. How dreadfully sad.

Or he might go ski-ing in Verbier and just sort of trip up and fall down.
there's no need to destroy an entire helicopter to get rid of andrew, the paedo's friend. he could simply be ejected halfway through the flight. or walk backwards through the tail rotor or something.
 
It would be newsworthy if HRH wasn't appalled and would condone etc etc so it's not entirely, innocently clear why Buck House sees the need to state the obvious.
:eek:
(But of course it is.)
the suggestion he was might be appalling but i note the statement as quoted not in any way a denial it occurred. it's simply smoke and mirrors trying to make you think it's a denial.
 
Given that the girl involved was 17, and the age of consent in the UK is 16 his statement that he didn't have sex with an underage girl is, in the very strictest sense, true. It doesn't in any way excuse his behaviour nor should it clear him of any wrongdoing. It also doesn't clear him of associating with a convicted pedophile nor any one of his other crimes.
Surely it's the age of consent in the place where the sex took place which is relevant (as well as the coercion).
 
Unfortunate for our dear Prince that this photo was taken after Epstein had been released from gaol, having been convinced of child sexual abuse crimes.

_107794950_025261369.jpg
Behave, that's him telling Epstein how appalled he is!
 
Surely it's the age of consent in the place where the sex took place which is relevant (as well as the coercion).
Yes it is, but he could claim, as he seems to be doing, that she was not underage so it was OK.
 
Time for another royal wedding or pregnancy to divert attention. Or perhaps Philip could catch a cold or something to engineer outpourings of sympathy for the poor royals.
 
Yes, indeed (and I think the allegation is exactly that, that he first had sex with her somewhere that the age of consent was 18 - without even getting into the coercion).

Yes it is, but he could claim, as he seems to be doing, that she was not underage so it was OK.

The allegation is she was shipped from Florida (age of consent 18) to the UK for the sexual pleasure of Prince Andrew. The fact that the age of consent in the UK is 16 doesn’t stop that being sex trafficking of a minor.
 
Time for another royal wedding or pregnancy to divert attention. Or perhaps Philip could catch a cold or something to engineer outpourings of sympathy for the poor royals.
It's gone too far for a cold, one of them must be sacrificed like aslan only they won't be coming back. jadis elizabeth will do the deed herself
 
Last edited:
The allegation is she was shipped from Florida (age of consent 18) to the UK for the sexual pleasure of Prince Andrew. The fact that the age of consent in the UK is 16 doesn’t stop that being sex trafficking of a minor.

It is alleged he had sex with her three times: Once in the UK, once at Epstein's New York residence and once on his island. Although I'm unsure how old she was on each occasion.
 
Back
Top Bottom